 _ __
Definición
Dinámica de
los Autismos
|
People with a bizarre condition called
synesthesia see sound, smell colors, and taste shapes Neuroscientists think
they might open a
window into the ultimate mystery of human consciousness,
(Brad Lemley). Esta lógica es excelente,
pero
Si synesthesia es un problema de ligación, autismo
puro es un problema similar, (y mi tentativa para curarme revela
la posibilitad de conexiones en la edad avanzada...)
Por eso, copiando la lucecita de Branly, (que nos llevo al Internet) u
el grano de polvo de Fleming creando una nueva medicina), prefiero estos
estraños niños que hablan muy tarde como Einstein,
or quien se merece un Guinness, Selin Birger...
Niños que aparecen como Athena, listos para luchar y ganar... |
__Yo pensé dedicar este texto
a los padres de autistas que lucharon contra el "psy-fraudism", rehusando
la _imbecilidad por sus niños
y la culpa por ellos. Pero Vinci ve en esta lucha desesperada una "analogía"
triste, con _las inteligencias notables, (Celsus
a Voltaire, Diderot a Loisy, Combes, Couchoud...), que se opusieron al
__progreso
de los satammismos de todo tipo. Como ninguno propuso una solución
de reemplazo, sólo obligaron _las
ratas auto-divinisadas a poner una "cara civilizada"
____Yo por consiguiente dedico
esta página al "psy-venidero", que aceptará la línea
de Renan: "Si un solo sector _de la neurosciencia
escapa a la neurosciencia, no habrá neurosciencia". Entonces
esperemos al genio que unirá el _top-autismo
de Einstein y WittgEinstein, la prosopamnesia de Darwin, con el prosopautismo
de Newton y Vinci...
____Mi texto favorito en mi curso de
creatividad es el "Hard-Soft parallelism", capítulo "caso del de
ausencia de _paralelismo". Los niños
autistas resuelven los "puzzles" de la manera más inesperada:_
_imaginemos la transposición
de su método al mundo de las ideas..
|
_0.
El "Autismo no existe!"
¡0.1 Un millón de años,
ya!
0.2 Autismo en progresión fuerte,
0.3 "Hacer una regla"
¿1. La obsesión para las "reglas?"
1.1 Un pequeño Masón haciendo
reglas
2. Tabla de evoluciones diferentes,
2.1 Ansiedad al centro
2.2. La resistencia al sufrir...
2.3 La opción de soledad,
|
__2.4 Necesidad para el Orden,
__2.5 Necesidad por Aprender,
__2.6 la tendencia auto-destructiva
__2.7 Curiosa ecolalia
_3. Conclusión en forma de Apertura
__3.1 Calma recobrada por alta lucha
__3.2 Extensión de la Mesa
__3.3 Preparar el último noodigmo...
__3.4 ¿El "TOP-AUTIST" como un éxito?
__3.5 "Él no se preocupaba... "
_4. Definiciones ad lib.__ |
0.
Introduciòn: "El autismo no existe!"
¡Tantos autistas, tantos autismos! El autismo es el resultado de
la paradoja serpentina de James:
"La anormalidad permite
conocer lo normal",
(luego este "normal" permite etiquetar a lo "anormal").
Un progreso apareció en AUTISM99, (Londres), reconociendo tres grupos:
___
_
"Kannerians",
Sint ut sunt..., "niños que no se mueren ni se curan"; ciertamente
ese ramo es el mejor conocido, y casi el único estudiado...
____
"Aspergers",
especie conocida cuando la protege un paraguas universitario,
____
"Cavendishers",
nombre en espera de aprobación,
¿Quién
indica el grupo a estudiar en prioridad? ¿Que podría tener
la llave?
AUTISM99 también
muestra tres grupos de observadores, bastante diferentes:
_________
"problem-outside",
_________
"problem-inside
home",
_________
"problem-inside"
¿Quien es el mejor preparado para resolver el problema?
Sólo un punto es reconocido por todos: autismo, "fenómeno
exclusivamente humano", (ya que los animales
no son "conscientes", un error que lleva a un "cul-de-sac"!)
El "top-autismo" es, en mi opinión, solamente un uso eficaz de un
exceso de ansiedad. Hoy algunos "especialistas" admiten que el "top-autismo"
podría ser general, (ídem para la "prosopamnesia"), siendo
el resultado de una evolución natural, acabando en un "animal
prematuro adaptado para nada ",
con un montòn de "problema-sin-resolver."
Los autismos son consecuencia de nuestra marcha hacia la conciencia:
la mente humana fue
imaginada para adaptar al hombre a todo los
ambientes e incluso para cambiarlos, pero el cerebro es en grande
peligro durante su formación
o su cableado, peligro de cualquiera "Perturbación no Especificada",
de cualquier
accidente, (por causas físicas
o químicas, humos, drogas...), y de la mayoría de las enfermedades.
Lo qué
explica mi documento N°2:
Una "Teoría de la Mente"
es inevitablemente una "Teoría de
la Conciencia",
documento preparado por una síntesis
en el documento N°1:
Una "filosofía del "top-autistmo"
anida dentro del " Mundo-Dos" de Popper
basada en la regla,
"La calidad de una definición
depende de la calidad de la definición de su ambiente...
"
Premiado de la etiqueta
"asperger", por mi sentido de los detalles, yo necesito mencionar mi facilidad
en la síntesis.
¿Entonces? barramos
en el espacio y en el tiempo, por consiguiente:
¡0.1 hace un millón
de años, ya!
¿El autismo existió en la Gruta
de Cros-Magnon?
¡Probablemente! Algunos
"niños retardadosdos fueron salvados por sus Madres, (lo qué
pudo explicar el porcentaje más alto de autistas entre los muchachos).
Caritas legendarias hicieron fácil esconderles
entre las muchachas pero yo imagino la tormenta bajo sus cráneos:
el celos hacia los hermanos, (que el padre se llevó a cazar, ya
el complejo de Benjamín, el niño más joven?), desprecio
de las hembras para las "personas débiles", sintiéndose de
el abandono, desee, para dibujará la atención del padre...
(éstos criterios son regularmente vistos en nuestros "creadores",
Ingres, Rimbaud, Mozart, Hugo, Manet, Wordsworth-en-Xanadu; artistas, muy
creativos pero no verdaderos "genios").
En ese tiempo, el "anormal"
no tenía ninguna posibilidad para sobrevivir, menos para reproducirse.
Pero
la selección darwiniana les dio una
oportunidad, usar su inteligencia. Y el "anormal", (inventando el
arco y el fuego, domando el perro y la oveja, y cultivando su jardín),
transformó en anormales aquéllos "normales" que los llamaron
anormal. Y las Bardot buscaron la compañía de nuestro
artista en cuevas sixtinas, diestro a cazar y pescar, grande contador
y asador de carne; y tuvieron muchos niños. Koestler podría
enseñar que todos nosotros somos "anormales", descendientes de estos
anormales.
Todos los hombres, (incluso
el mejor educado socialmente, el más respetuoso de los "reglas"),
tiene un "grano de locura", bien escondido y pronto a reaparecer.
0.2 hoy, el autismo está
en el progreso fuerte,
urbi y orbi, los tipos "soft" o "hard", por
el aumento de sus causas respectivas. Desde la aparición de Mukho,
y sus hermanos de Marsella, sabemos que el joven "Kannerian" puede saltar
a "Asperger". Cómo generalizar esta migración? hasta el top-nivel,
el último salto de "Asperger" a "Cavendisher" ? (evitando las paradas
a mitad de camino y los paraguas universitarios).
Un fenómeno interesante,
que a lo menos, puede guiarnos.
Quizá tengo una
idea, para el segundo saltos; yo certifico que pegar no vale después
de los diez años. Uno entenderá por qué yo busco las
"locomotoras" de los genios, (a veces difícil encontrar, caso de
Newton). Las mías me impresionaron al punto de calmar mis "rabietas."
Así ofrezcamos un
asiento al "problem-inside top-autist", quien puede probar que el
autismo es quizás la fuente de todo los conocimientos",
porque él va directo a la comprensión de las estructuras
de pensamiento. Y una vez más, yo les cito a los doctores Cambier
y Verstichel, (profesores, del Hospital Henri Mondor):
"... el progreso es a menudo el
trabajo de genios que... dieron curso libre a la INTUICIÓN REVELADORA
de UN PENSAMIENTO SIN IDIOMA. De Zénon hasta Einstein, muchos ejemplos...
" ("El Cerebro Reconciliado", Masson 1998).
Nosotros somos "refuzniks",
escapando al entrenamiento, a las reglas sociales, que "prohiben un "pensamiento
que no piensa", (ya explicado, hace un siglo, por Saussure y Wittgenstein).
Gracias, Ludwig, por la transición.
0.3 " Haciendo una regla ",
título extraño para un libro,
(sin mucho interés), sobre el pensamiento de Wittgenstein. Ludwig
que padeció un exceso de padre, (el mío era inexistente),
muestra una probabilidad fuerte de autismo, (según mis criterios
màs bien adaptados a los top-autistas); ciertamente el aristócrata
entre los autistas. Tal vez, "Noblesse oblige" a esconder
"tantra", "colères froides", "rabietas"? Pienso con ejemplos,
que un prosop'autista debe cultivar el "dry tantrum".
En 1911, mientras un futuro
mariscal de Francia veia el avión como "juguete", nuestro
Babbage de la Aviación tenía inventado una hélice
y estaba realizando un motor de chorros. Buena oportunidad
para un aparte, y ver que "filosofìa es actividad", (es del
propio Wittgenstein). ¿Cómo Ludwig razonaba? ya habia
creado una hélice, artefacto que se "atornilla
en el aire", enviando el aire
de frente hacia detràs , alrededor del tubo. No muy eficaz y este
tipo de aviones encuentrò rápidamente su limite en velocidad.
¿Entonces pasando el flujo aéreo dentro
del tubo, sin un soplo perdido?
Y los aviones pasaron Mach Uno!
Luego con medio-siglo
de antelación, produjo por intuición-deducción
las "Tablas de Decisión",
tan utiles para el proceso de datos, (los utilizadores ignoran al autor).
¡Ciertamente
el filósofo más fácil para vender en las empresas!)
Wittgenstein tiene otros
rasgos top-autistas: una mezcla de "déficits", (sobre todo de tipo
social), y "regalos", como capacidad para el análisis, el
perfeccionismo, y la habilidad manual: Yo pongo Wittgenstein entre los
filósofos capaz construir una fábrica en Africa, solo, (con
Popper, Locke, Comte... y claro el Newton y Vinci); y entre las inteligencias
que penetraron el Mundo-Dos, (como Peirce, o Schopenhauer, o Saussure...).
Doctor Temple proclama
Ludwig un "autista"? yo propongo un intercambio de nuestras documentaciones
sobre el pensador más difícil para entender, transmitido
por sus pocos estudiantes, (también vale para Saussure que destruyó
sus textos). Que puede hacer un alumno cuando el profesor cambios
de ideas y se contradice? Él deja de notar. Wittgenstein, para esta
razón, es un criterio para "filósofos", obligados hablar
sobre notas rechazadas por el autor!
" Según Kurzweiller,
(filósofo!), (1) "Wittgenstein, es discutiblemente el filósofo
Occidental más significante del 20 Siglo... " (2) "Realmente el
Tractatus no dice nada sobre la mente... (solo que conociendo el cerebro
se sabrà nada de la mente!) la
Computadora irá a la iglesia para la meditación y oración...
" (3) "Muchos de los artistas principales son máquinas en
2029... ",
(citado por otro filósofo! con que rapidez pasàn al delirio!)
¿1. Por qué tanta
obsesión para las "reglas "?
¿Es una advertencia
de Wittgenstein contra un peligro real? un reflexion en la necesidad de
seleccionar las reglas que nosotros introducimos en nuestro cerebro? Lo
importante es que su obsesion para "reglas" produjo
las "Tablas de Decisión ", (¿similar
a mi receta para "M.I.S".?). Turing encontrando Ludwig, (en lugar
del von Neumann), para hablar de proceso de datos . Más minutos
de silencio para oportunidad perdida...
Mientràs esperaba
un "copyright", yo encadené con otra investigacion: después
de reducir todos los documentos a un único "record" en la
computadora, encontrar una estructura común para cualquier "pensamiento".
"La computadora puede
pensar como cualquier cerebro que "piensa que piensa", y nos obligará
a pensar correctamente". Simplemente describiendo las "reglas" del
cerebro.
Yo imagino Wittgenstein
explicando que la "matemática es tautología" al Señor
Russel, (el igual del francès Poincaré), id est que sus reglas
no sirven a pensar.
1.1 "Haciendose reglas"
por un pequeño albañil:
Si aceptamos la mejor
definición del joven autista ,
"un albañil que decide construir
su casa, sin experiencia ni medios... "
(Dr. Milcent, "inside-home-problem",
pero no parece distinguir las causas "hard" o "soft").
Una sugerencia para una
revolución en la educación de los niños: proporcionar
las herramientas y la seguridad sin imponer el plan de la casa? "Los
albañiles pequeños no imponen silencio qué ellos aprendieron";
su lóbulo correcto se niega al formación-entrenamiento que
haría ¡ellos "normal"? Pero este lóbulo correcto debe
programarse tanto como la izquierda! para recibir ¡las reglas sociales!
Si no, usted prepara una "explosión de gángsteres" pequeños.
Hoy, el "psys", anuncíelo pero era previsible desde un tiempo largo:
Cassez les niches, on
vous cassera les miches...
Break the nests, they will
break your chests...
Rompen nidos, les romperàn
huevos!
µµµµµµµµµµ**
1.1 "Making a rule "
by a little mason:
"Making
a rule" becomes clear, if we stick to the best definition of the young
autist,
"a mason who decides
to build his house without experience nor means..."
Dr. Milcent, ("problem-inside
home), does not distinguish the causes: "hard" or "soft").
A suggestion
for a revolution in the education of all the children: to provide
tools and safety belts without imposing the plan of the house? "The
little masons do not silence what they learned";
their right lobe refuses the formation-training which would make them "normal"?
But this right lobe must be programmed as much as the left! to receive
social rules! If not, you prepare a "explosion
of small gangsters". Today, the "psys"
announce it but it was foreseeable since a long time:
The majority
of the men accept the rules of their group, ready-chewed. While reading
the "Autobiographies of Autists", (Donna...), please note that some
of us manufacture personal "rules" for themselves. We seek to tranquillize
us by putting order everywhere, even in our moral world. Changing from
surprising efforts to unproductive discouragements, we impose rules to
ourselves, then to others, and obtain a label: "maniatico-depressive",
"cyclothymic", (but it's "outside-views").
2. Table of different evolution
The kannerian
listing of criteria, hyper-described, is perfect to start.
I bring the other extreme.
Awaken by a "Man who mistook his Wife for a Hat", but convinced
I would never met a single "face-forgetter", I plunged into History
and established my "criteria of top-autism".
Between these
two lists, the "criteria for aspergers" of Martijns will fit very correctly.
Since "Problem-Outside People" are rather interested in the first
category, we can confiscate the two others, and reconcile all of
them in the same table, under three chapters:
(1) "traditional" basic criteria, (kannerian),
(2)
"sublimation" in top-autism, already appearing in the
middle (asperger),
(3)
personal confidences, with call to witnesses.
"Prosopamnesians"
recognized each other by exchanging their recipes to survive. I think that
this method must be extended to autists, who do not know themselves
and do not know each other.
Another interesting point would
be to add the "outside
view": as an
example:
"outside view on prosopamnesia":
In a course,
a "spy" labelled me: "extraordinary absent- mindedness".
Now "prosopamnesia"
is linked with autism, since autistic children, according to Yale Univ.
has this problem. But, I see a confusion between "agnosia", (not
recognising a structure, like seeing people with a cauliflower or a hat),
and "amnesia", (not recognising an already seen thing, or fact...)
This is due to the fact that "prosopagnosians"
are rare but all sent to hospital. While "prosopamnesians
are not "interesting" though numerous.
But are "prosopias",
incapacity to remember or just to engrave?
And the basic
distinction for "prosop(amnesia-agnosia)",
between "accidental" and "born" arn't doubtful and dangerous? impeding
further research... A good introduction to my autistic mania for "correct
definitions" and even my mania for a "definition
of the definition". A definition offers dull satisfaction
and stupid quiet sleep for the mind.
My life and
work as a consultant were influenced by my labelling.
I was afraid
I could be "discovered" too soon, loosong my status like a poor teacher.
The most dangerous people were the "saviours", people with solutions, (refused
by the top-management), to save their firms. Logically and happily they
were my first visitors, offering help for promotion; already insulted when
I asked some time to analyse the problems. I was prepared to meet my opponents
of next month...
2.1 Anguish at the center
Rather than
associability, (an "outside point of view"),
I put the anxiety at
the center of autisms,
Each of us should
revive his difficult moments, divorces, loss of a relative, of his work,
serious hospitalization, departure for a boarding school, for the war...
and thinks that the new-born baby can live his own events with the same
intensity, fear of darkness, nightmares, feeling of abandonment...
(Freud, who "discovered sexuality in babies", will accept!)
Being "problem-inside",
I think that the march to soft-autism is difficult to detect, then the
linking is irreversible and final: engines can't be changed during
flight! The "cures" probably come from an "overloading". Many relapses
could be explained by a rehabilitation stopped too early, (idem for any
remedy!) Apparently, there is one and only one, solution: "to make with",
id est pushing towards "top-autism".
2.1.1 "Sublimation of anxiety":
The "psychologists"
admit, that anguish is essential to live, to be creative. Too
much anxiety causes the mania of putting order which reassures, preparing
a fast defense; it ends in "perfectionism", (necessary in many professions...)
but also an indifference towards "secondary things".
2.1.2 Confidences:
To earn a
living, I practised "jobs requiring problem-solving". I think
that my missions, my files were better prepared , my work more excavated.
I was called "fouinard", (Nosey Parker")? It led me to work 24 hours, (or
30 days), to end a file to remit absolutely. In private, I am unable to
leave a problem without a solution.
The following
criterion is therefore a corollary of the anxiety:
2.2. Resistance to suffering,
disease, hunger, fatigue
enough surprising
for the "outside people", it is rather an indifference to small worries
to dedicate all strength to the "big problem" of the moment, to put order,
to survive. This is often seen as "agitation", by "outside-observers".
2.2.1 " Sublimation ":
This capacity
of work, day and night, found in Newton, Darwin, ( and Edison, the champion,
with 60 hours no-stop).
2.2.2 Confidences:
I remember a surgeon, after an operation, asking to me whether somebody
accompanied me, if I wanted a taxi. I answered him: "I 'll return home
by bicycle... " Then, he asked my age.
Agitation?
I do not know what it is. A child is capable of Olympic efforts. Just
find an employment for his activity. But do not lock him up in a
kitchen of two meters out of three!
My "intellectual
agitation " was judged "dispersion" by my prof of philo, who advised me:
"Read only good books!" Without giving the definition! Seek it and
you renovate philosophy.
"Good books are written
by good philosophers, easily known by their "good books"...
I wished to work
30 days on a problem, (a solution recomandable in a company with
problems!), then leave, (I found directors to call me "cyclotimic"
and "autodidact", but none to understand what they could not do!)
Today, calmed
by some problems of age, I am astonished by what I did in Africa; ignoring
a 100% malaria, (and even the variant that leads you delirious to
hospital). While building the factory, the two chief-masons
gave up, and I added their work to mine.
But, in such
stressing conditions, a very bad news caused an explosion, a "dry-tantrum",
the need to punish without caring about my interests. then a bad
fame. Therefore, when my children were taken from me, because being
child, "I did not
think of others",
I went at my/their torturers, with my legendary obstinacy and capacity
of concentration, day and night.
2.4.3 "Outside View":
My
mania of "definitions" could explain that some "psys" declare
me "scientific", (though a diploma of data processing produces only "technicians").
2.3 The choice of loneliness,
rather a means of protecting
one's self, against "parasites", a need which becomes a taste, justified
by the effectiveness in work, the refusal of the others to work as much
as we do, their need to stop during the week-ends...
2.3.1 " Sublimation "
It results
the phenomenon of "life under a glass bell", obvious in the book
of Birger, (impossible for a normal child). But see the book of Dr.
Diebold, presenting a phenomenon very related with autism: "epilepsy
like refuge". The example of American Scientific, (February
2000, the child in front of three screens), seen as a deficit can evolve
to a hyper-concentration, (without this capacity, earth would not be explored
yet):
2.3.2 Confidences
All
my life, I shocked with, and was pested by, by people wanting
to make my happiness and fortune, thinking that I could earn more...
I always lived alone, (even married), seek no more to convince doctors
and "psys" that a person is quite happy with books, pastels
sticks, computers, museums and libraries...
2.3.3 "Outside View":
Some psys,
("diplomocus memoris causa", with right to label and libel), are
more than dangerous. They consider the thirst for justice and truth
as signs of patanoïa. Worthy sons of Freudy and Bethel that decided
to separate young autistics from their parents. Any judgement first
judges its judge. Let's use the trick of my "locomotives":
mentionning "diplomas" provoked ejection of the fellow. "To do is
to be". What Zenon, Newton, Einstein,... had understood.
This time,
I need to answer: all people living alone, rapidly, start turning around
the bush and stop being creative. But that's the lot of all Professors
of Universities, with an easy pupils and never teaching them
how to criticize a teacher! That's the lot of all people in ghetto. Therefore
the problem is: "How to continue thinking in any situations?"
Expecting
your tricks to compare them with the mine of mines.
2.4 The need for the same order
I see it
as a simple corollary of our anxiety, reassuring because one will
immediately find the object that saves.
2.4.1 " Sublimation ":
the intellectual
needs for exactitude in the definitions, the arguments; horror of
error, lie, fraud.
More difficult
for "autism-outside-people", (who should reread the bibliographies
of Newton, Edison, Einstein, Vinci...): the need for order changed into
a need to set order, (and I lived it). Newton was named Manager of
the Mint not for his mathematical gifts but for his honesty, product rare
at that time. It sent 22 forgers to the gallows and attended the
"liturgy"...
2.4.2 Confidences:
I am a perfect
disorder but, as Schopenhauer furious because the maid had dusted
his Buddha, I can't admit anybody setting order in my things, (I would
see it as an attempt to set his own order! produing danger in case od an
urgent need for an object). In the "soft world", I pushed this mania
of exactness until the definition of the definition!
I need a
frame to work. Many people take resolutions, at least on the
first of January, always the same since they do not keep them, most popular
being stop smoking. I make a new planning regularly; and I
stick to them; if not, the Sky would fall on my head. And I change
them and I justify these changes, because "solving problem makes you see
new problems", and therefore I must plannify again...
I am a frightening
debater: I easily turn an audience over and I enjoy it. With a facility
to present the same argument in two opposite, perfectly convincing
ways, thanks to my logical game, "flip-flop" symbolized by rabbit-duck
of Wittgenstein:
|
"I believe in God: no need of thomism: who seeks his key in
all his pockets? when instinctly he knows it is in the left one?"
Now be Janus:"I
do not believe in God: no need with... "
|
(I know
the limits pf "thomism" better than any theologist!)
2.4.3 "Outside View":
I would choose
our famous "inertia" and Gauss told of his wife dying, and
answering: "Let her
wait a moment..."
just the time to solve an equation. We want to finish what we are doing,
so important to save the world; we want to secure a point that will give
us security. Disturbing us will provoke a drama. I was awfully rude with
my mother requiring me for a thing of no interest for me, at that time.
Maybe, the best investment in my youth, since I got the spanking of my
life and definitely learnt the respect due to foremen and "martinets",
(our martinet is your cat-o-nine-tails).
"Outside
Observers" should learn from Newton the opposite and complementary
phase of "inertia-that doesn't move will not move..." We have the
other side, like the atom of Einstein, bullet-wave: when we start, let
nobody stay in front of us. In cases where, (I admit it now), that my interest
was to give up, I choose being killed. And, "auctoritas, ultima ratio",
a university diploma was no argument to calm me down.
2.5 The need to learn, (and to
solve!)
(mentionned by Donna Williams
and Temple Grandin, and...), is the mania of squirrels that accumulate
by nature. We want to push back the unknown and to prepare with any eventuality.
We collect and file knowledge, the techniques, the languages; as others
collect the stamps or make crosswords. This "remedy" is effective:
to have ready answers reassure. Therefore we don't differ from
"normals" but we have made our answers; and we(ll improve them with the
next trial.
I therefore
hate all the games, (waste of time, no possible progress, frozen exercices...),
but I need to know their rules.
2.5.1 "Sublimation"?
The preceding
assertions make possible to connect on a characteristic easy
to see in "geniuses", (not obvious at first sight):
Newton, Darwin,
Einstein, gave solutions in the most different fields. Though they
were limited to some juicy fields and not prepared outside their domains..
With accusation of never finishing anything, (Vinci was so accused
by Michel-Angelo): I explain it by the fact that "finishing for
others" does not interest us: like quitting World-Two, (still
full of mysteries), for World-Three, (to lose time in palavers).
After living in World-Two, we enjoy it and flee the "disputationes"of
World-Three... We prefer to start on one of the bigger problems that
any solution reveals.
2.5.2 Confidences:
I'm
attracted by mysteries, symbolized by the compass of Albert,
while any "normal" child breaks the object to look inside.
In the enterprises,
I jumped on the "doc" of any odd machines, sometimes prohibited of visit,
(later a mechanic engineer lead me to it. I was fascinated by the
"tricks of hands" of certain workers. As soon as IBM started the mass-production
of computer, I pushed myself, (in World Trade!) in position of observer.
Therefore
"need to learn" is incorrect. We obey the will of a Nature pushing
us to collect ready answers. I thus prefer, "accumulating ready-answers"
Thus our need for order and the need to learn, comes from the same
source: anxiety.
I filed Portuguese, Ki-swahili, the oil technique, a stay in the
copper mines, seven Basics, two Assemblers and C... and half of the National
Library. But finally, you need to
solve all the encountered problems.
Thus, I list problems to be solved, which I sometimes solve by the dozen.
Finally, my sublimation of "problems-solving" concretized itself in a course
of creativity, (which filled assistants with enthusiasm but nobody could
apply), combining the extremes, the finest analysis and the most total
synthesis. I was fascinated by the dust of Fleming and the glow of
Branly, (quantity of such exemples under your eyes, that could change
the world...) but I'm gifted for at global syntheses like the reduction
of all the documents to one line in the computer.
The bouquet
is perhaps to have reduced all my creative methods to a slogan, "BREAK!",
while my challenger in this field, Spencer de Bono, uttered only: "POH!"
2.5.3 "Outside View":
One day, a director told
me:
"Why this
mania of yours to start with the most difficult problem!"
"Because
then, all others problems will have disappeared... "
A manner
of ending with TWELVE problems at the same time... On the contrary, you
find yourself with THIRTEEN problems.
2.6 Strange echolalia:
Phenomenon
normal in the evolution of any child but that must disappear... The child
discovers the power of words and plays with their sonorities.
2.6.1 "Sublimation":
Have you
notice the place autistic children grant to tales. The story of LINWOOD
starts with a child asking for a tale, just an echolalia of higher
level. All children adore tales; and foreign language teaching is
facilitated.
2.6.2 Confidences:
I spent my
life, inventing stories, by changing the least event into marvellous. Even
the difficult moments of my life of Manager were solved by a tale, a means
to locate my allies, to make people laugh, and reverse the opinions.
2.7 The auto-destructive tendency
Wittgenstein
had five brothers, three were successful in suicide, the fourth only
lost an arm, (Ravel wrote to him the "concerto for the left hand").
Ludwig was satisfied with a "financial suicide" that Freud would explain
like "a revolt against the father". He did it lucidly, giving the dough
to his sisters rather than to the poor: "They had so much that a billion
more...", (one of them offered her Goyas to her maid, "obsolete,
my dear!").
2.7.1 "Sublimation":
I understand that, regularly, Ludwig felt the need to disappear, for a
"Trobriand period", as a primary teacher in lost villages, or as
a gardener of convent; returning each time so enriched that one should
impose this method on all "diplomocus memoris causa".
2.7.2 Confidences
I had my
"Rimbaud period", in Central Africa, building a factory, quite
alone, (with an initiation in a lost tribe). Now seek this "auto-destruction
" among young autists. and great artists.
2.7.3 "Outside View":
This
time, I'll look at the future and the loss for humanity. Nobody is obliged
to follow and any "psy" has a simple trick, a certificate of "patanoïa".
Ready for more?
IF
(1), in the Grotto of Cros-Magnon, autism
was directed by illiterate women for the greatest progress of humanity,
IF
(2) "Top-autism", (appearing through an excess
of anxiety well managed) is the source of any progress in knowledge, ending
in a public reconnaissance, sometimes after suicide, can we tolerate more
geniuses committing suicide before realizing? Can "psycialists" with
their so great a science detect "could-be geniuses"?
IF
(3), in 1942, the US created a program to
obtain medics in six months with excellent results...
IF
(4) you admit that any discovery of a new
world has a price, according to its nature...
IF
(5) you admit that the XIXth Century invented
"psychology" thanks to "philosophers" that had a grain... opening blocked
by the sorbonists diplomocus memoris causa of the XXth Century...
Urgent
to create a program of true research, with true researchers, prepared for
such a research and trying to solve through suffering and trials, without
help...
At least,
I have my link to next chapter!
3. Conclusion-opening
The "House Joint Resolution"
N° 174 proclaimed the decade 1990-1999,
" Decade of Brain "!
"Decade-ends"
in Decadence? Let's suppose for one moment that Top-Functioning-Autism
, (the wood Newton is made of, (and Vinci and Descartes), sometimes with
a coating of "prosopamnesia" like Darwin and myself...), that
Top-Autism was the source of any progress, in all knowledge, since
Zénon...
Then
only Newton could explain the brain of Newton and top-autism.
And for this
reason, your philosophers are mute... unable to solve the puzzle
of Locke, (nor Wittgenstein's puzzle, its echo).
3.1 Calmness gained by high fight,
The majority of the "geniuses"
solved an enormous problem before 25 years. If the solved problem is known
and searched by the scientific community, an acceptance will appear after
"disputationes inter pares". If not known and not searched by a
scientific community, taht doesn't not care for the next progress? Let
Newon send a rocket to the moon! Let Einstein burst Hiroshimen! The only
way is "bloody bleeding demos".
My
discovery of "satammism", when 22 years, was more than a revelation:
a shock leading to "isolation in hospital". Because I couldn't talk,
(not false according to the Freudian Churches). Even the more interested
were not interested! So I could continue on other subjects, building
"bases-for-thinking". My discovery of "Management Integrated System", at
38 years, was a true tranquillizer: instead of the "letter of motivation":
"Dear
Sir, my wife is pregnant for the fifth time and we did not eat since..."
I could " negotiate as a doctor
":
"Having believed that "the computer is management...
", some companies encounter difficulties... Of course the computer can
ensure management as my glasses could see the microbes and the rings of
Sirius: after Newton and Young, and..., established the laws of optics...
What I
state is already support by strong references..."
For me, this second revelation helped me to understand the fits of impatience
of Newton, Darwin, Vinci..., towards "colleagues that were no
more colleagues"...
3.2 Extension of the Table of
Mendeleiev:
It is impossible to create and
to see one's self creating. Or simply to understand one's progress. What
mind-improvement did I get by practising "morphodimensionnelle", (and
even introducing it into the building industry). But I am surprised that
the
complex of the Benjamin was not studied parallaly to autism. I lived
two experiments of this curious transfer on a new person while the "guilty
person" has completely disappeared a long time ago... The "patient",
programmed by fraternal jealousy, takes you in his collimator,
and you've little recourses against this hatred.
I was really
surprised by the exchanges between epilepsy and autism, to
learn that a student can have a crisis and only one in his/her life, on
the day of an examination. I for one need much more! A first-class
experiment not to be missed to know one's self and to know the possible
help of "others"...
When a professor
declares that
dyslexia i sa problem of wiring
and nothing else, it is an opportunity to establish the indispensable distinction
between autisms: "hard" and "soft". The wiring of the brain is an
adaptation to the circumstances found in the environment but it is
irreversible.
The
cases of parallelisms between hard and soft worlds are extremely useful
in creativity and problem-solving. But the table of Mendeleiev can also
include the book-makers, to show their merits and limits, can
also help to read the biographies with new eyes, (as I will show
it).
3.3 To prepare the last noodigm...
I do not know if the next
noodigm will redefine
"space-time", "movement", "force", "energy".
The need is obvious for "religion",
"man", "civilization", "value", "rights", "idea", "racism", "God", "crime",
"justice", "child", "successful life", "autisms"...
(but the most urgent of all
definition is the "definition of the definition").
As
much urgent is "currency",
social connection which must be defined within the framework of a "religion
worthy of this name"! I found remarkable the definition of the governor
of the Bank of France, (unhappy candidate for Maij' Triche!):
Money? "a
philosophical concept! thus ask the "philosophers".
Your definition
of "philosopher", PLEASE!
Who indicates to us why "the
great innovation of the next century, a new religion "was
immediately blurred into: "the
next century will be religious or will not be!"then:
"to get rich, found your own religion... "
Why did the
brain of Newton function wrongly in " religion "? Could a scientific
language block it when applied to the religious field? Or was
it so penetrated by the religious language of the time? "sinner",
"confession", "hell", "Christian values", "divine will",
(today, the deceptive ideas could be"intelligence",
"psychosomatic", "cognotivism "...,
which
preserve and prolong the errors that they pretend to eliminate).
Newton himself,
(or Einstein, labelled of antediluvian before its death), becoming
a proof that the language does block the thought?
"Satammism"
is the problem to be taken with full hands: we have passed the point of
no return, with two options, to accept a "civisation of Dark Ages " or
to decide on a true "civilization", with a true religion.
3.4 The "TOP-AUTIST",
as a success of Evolution?
I have a pretty tale: a
small goose with a long nozzle symbolizes the dangers and works of
Hercules she must surmount to become the queen of the ponds. Most difficult
is the psychic change which she must achieve before seeing frogs like jumping
beefsteaks; and before deserving the name of "stork". The
autism enigma will be understood only through understanding how a
small number escaped of this psychic prison while the majority perished.
Then programs in:
philosophy: a
mystery to be solved, the language,
neuropsychiatry: a mystery
to be solved, autism,
psychology: a mystery
to be solved, "genius".
Thereore, we can modify the assertion
of Rostand:
" Conscience, an
instrument created by Nature for auto-improvement of its Creature, (Deus
Creator becomes Deus Ociosus). The purpose of conscience is only to analyze
the effectiveness of each action acting on the changing environment , and
if necessary to change this environment..."
Today, d'Alembert would say to Magendie:
"Make me 'human sciences'
on the model of biology."
3.5 "He didn't worry for others?"
(Subtitle: "am
I on the spectrum"?)
Inside the
autistic species, I am certainly the only one certified by
two Courts of Justice! My mother, in an imprudent letter explained an anomaly
of my childhood: "Why
was I sent to the primary school at the 5 years age 5 months and 5 days?
(Which enabled me to reduec the 10 obligatory years to 6 years and 8 months).
 |
And the espaÑazi
Church , (by procedure reminding "Bill
Clito versus Moni Kaka"),
condemned me to total destruction on a sentence of my mother:
"When young, he
never worried about others".
|
|
(However, I had my humane period,
teaching in a lost college of Africa, "to
know if we had all the same brain",
(an idea typically autist!). And a missionnary wrote that it owed me his
house).
Additional
crimes: "contacted
journalists", (I
am the clone of a very great French journalist), and "bad
character":
My eight years daughter, (so adapted to my autism that we practised mind-reading),
delivered to hysterical nuns as the payment for my destruction, and
I must attend "politely" the legal liturgy! This incredible affaire enabled
me to study the criminal
system which produced
Francoco and Hitler, Stalin and so many others.
In order
to limit the aJustice of the Middle Ages, the king of spain, in 1884, imposed
a "validation" by the Napoleon code. How to translate? "My
husband separated me from the Holy Church"?
The civil judge took his list and chose: "Abandonment
of family, brutality, breakage of object..."
Since then, I fulfilled my promise:
" If you touch a hair
of the kid,
I pète your " commercio
of mierda ".
My own destruction
involved the destruction of the Messianic sects, transforming the preachers
into "auto-fucked brains". I just used two "Skeletons
of the VatiCave".
Plenty more of them! A top-autist adores collectionning.
4. definitions of autisms:
I always
cried my horror of cuttings and their danger. I found this massacre in
enterprises, ("fayolised" by a cutting in functions), in psychology,
religion...
In the past,
I had the mania to collect the "appreciations" on the "philosopher" I treated
and maltreated. For Descartes, I habve some eighty of them. Nowadays, room
for the computer.... Certain " specialists " should purge their remnant
of Cartesianism, smelling the aquiquinade of saint Aquinas.
I tried to
fight the consequences of this pork-butchery by a series of "rules", (an
autistitic mania, "making rules"):
"the solution of the
problem is no more on the place of the problem... ",
(a success, while adding:" the
persons in charge would have found it!")
or:
"If a problem was not
solved by the "specialists of the problem",
avoid them like the
plague... ",
(another success!)
Any definition
of autism must distinguish the origin, "hard" or "soft", "physical"
or "psychical". It is not easy because these two worlds react continuously
on each other. I remain astonished by all the cerebral " localizations
" which seem affected by, or could cause a type of autism; and of all the
diseases which seem to cause or accompany this " deficit ".
It is proven
that any "conscient thought" uses almost all the brain but raises the question
of the conscience in the animals. We deny this faculty to them? perhaps
what our definition is " reductionistic "? Once again, we lead to a need
for revision and definition for clean of the man, the " conscience ".
I do not see how curing a nondefinite
disease, to propose a formation with one " disturbed ", to select a profession
to him, (or simply to speak about the autism), without stabilized terms,
(how
many " psys " distinguish " prosopagnosy " from " prosopamnesy "? type
these words on Internet!)
Of all
the proposals which exist, the
clearest definition was given by the the creator of the word, (Bleuler,
in 1911), corresponding
to the closed child, refusing to communicate. He did not include there
on-agitated children, (perhaps a work for Bettelheim, which made a training
course of studies in Dachau: "How
" agitated anti-nazis " become " Moslem").
The aboulism would be the final
phase of hyper-agitation, resignation. Bettelheim, (and even Kanner!),
followed Freud and the parents became responsablesde the autism of their
children: I accept like " assumption " to be broken ", not freudaine to
be diffused!).
Did Freud want to be avenged
for " those which had not received it "? like this Bleuler, creator of
the term " autism ", which luii closed the gate with the nose. This last,
having made a success of its tender offer on International Psychiatry,
was avenged on Janet. Who avenges Janet? It is easy, with a " logical play
", simple " a kick the tortoise!" without same showing the results of the
psychoanalysis in autism.
B / the definition which passes
nearest? (Dr. Milcent).
" a mason who decides to build
his house without experiment nor means... "
It is enough to look at: before
speaking, the new-born baby explores his field, imitating the bull which
déboule in the arena. Its brain does not contain anything but wants
all to learn. But "one rests only on what
resists".
Any creativity starts with a shock. The new-born baby needs shocks and
not too. But as of this phase, the child is not satisfied to learn: he
creates for itself operational working arrangements, and " ranges ". He
uses the two hands. I like this definition of space, "place
of meeting of the hand and of the eye".
Why not "meets with the two hands "? I know remarkable ambidexters,
(I am with Vinci!). Who finds us how sublimates the ambidextrism in the
world software? That gives the most intelligent people whom I met on four
continents!
Which stages has to traverse
the small mason? can it make its program, change matter, return? certain
stages are they bases for a following stage? It is significant before teaching
the reading, knowledge recent, abnormal for the brain, using a total means
in a sequential way.
But one should not forget the
influence of the medium, which I symbolize by tales, like my " Small Goose
with the Long Nozzle " or the " Raft of the Jellyfish ":
A full boat children
sinks. Some seize tables and of chairs, make a raft and arrive at ground
with a capacity, a will to create, survive which will remain to them all
the life. With the other extreme, less undertaking, least lucky taken in
the hold, will be saved in extremis, with indelible and irreversible marks.
5.1 definitions deduced from
readings:
(In company, we find employees
who refuse any confidence... Then, one " deduces " starting from the conduits.
I treated the Chirak young person in this manner!)...
I take a handbook randomly: I
am surprised by the number of Dr. Koch who studied this bacillus:
a. Autism like " deficit of
the thought in action and deficit of the emotion "
Kanner, (1943), Hermelin and
O' Connor, (1970), Rutter and Lockyer, (1967), Wing, (1975, 1979), Curcio,
(1978), Tanguay, (1982), Hoffman and Prior, (1982), Sigman and Ungerer,
(1984), Frith, (1984), Adrien, (1986), Hobson, (1987),
B Autism like " deficit perceptivo-engine
":
Bleuler, (1911), Freud,
(1920), Anthony, (1958), Goldfarb, (1961), Rimland, (1964),
Of The Bay-trees, Carlson, (1969), Lovaas, (1971), Schopler, Reichler,
(1971), Lelord, (1973), Gravelling, Brooke, (1978), Ornitz, Ritvo, (1968,1983),
James, Barry, (1980,1988)...
Why does it take 88 years to
describe kids whom one meets each day? (not found Linné yet? I write
a tale to you: "the
discovery of the elephant in 36 browsings ")
But it misses a " large doctor "! To sprinkle... is half of the species
ignored?
Case of reductionnism? Can we
leave a synthesis the contributions?
/ One has connects on the
delay to speak:
Deficit of the language
and the cognitive functions... Characteristics of the aspects of the language
dependent on the contexte?Troubles of the development of the systems of
the language and comprehension... Deficit of the functions of mediation
of the left hemisphere...(does
the left hemisphere hold the language?)
B / social Relations difficult:
" Difficulty of extracting
from the rules...
Innate incapacityto establish the emotional
contact... Deficiency in
social relation... Not recognition of human
like autonomous agents... Time in the
comprehension of the facial expressions" (perhaps
connected to " prosopamnesy "?),Difficulty of sharing the experiment
with the others? Incapacity to design the
others like thinking beings?... (are
these last criteria definitions of the "Theory of Mind"?)
The language being essential to
communicate with the others, let us make the synthesis of two groups: "man?
(of Lacan), it speaks!"
the child must speak! It was forgotten that Einstein spoke with quatre/cinq
years? (myself, one put to me at the school with five years and half. I
was surely late according to standards'). Did one forget the results of
"the noble hand imposed to the left-handeds person to write"? The
refinement of certain questionnaires point out works of désoeuvrés
conseilleurs to me, half-compartments of the companies:
"... We empirically
selected thirteen neurophysiological functions, which one supposes that
the disturbances take part to differing degree with the autistic syndrome.
It is about the attention, perception, association, the intention, tonicity,
motricity, the imitation, the emotion, the instinct, the contact, the communication,
the evolution in time or regulation and cognition... "
Just a listing
made by an "outside-problem
descripter".
