I couldn't not explain "satammism" to Roosevelt
21/09/04
|
|
|
I couldn't not explain "satammism" to Roosevelt |
21/09/04 |
| 1/
My great regret? 1.1 Who saw? Bottero, Charpin, Jaspers 2/
Reasons of the success of a
criminal system 3/
But how
did I see myself? |
4/
Possibility
of reversing
"neo-satammism"? 4.1 Logical obstacles for "neo-satammism" 4.2 Practical obstacles for "neo-satammism" 4.3 The untraceable analogy 4.4 Pagodas inside the Great Analogy 5/ Two " butterflies" that changed the world 5.1 The "butterfly of Tarse" 5.2 Looking for the "missing butterfly" 5.3 Return to the Great Analogy 5.4 Absolute and suicidal contradiction 6/ Philosophy, "unending quest" 6.1 Contribute with your "living memories" 6.2 Three researches. |
1/
My great regret?
Just:
"I couldn't explain 
satammism' to
Roosevelt".
The history of the 20th Century would be awfully different... At
least
let's hope Humanity shall not lose this opportunity to analyze,
describe,
stop the "soft-terrorism",
extending and replacing the "paleo-satammism".
But why did humanity, (with so many "philosophers"), ignore
this criminal system, appeared 5000 years ago in Mesopotamia,
which
conditioned, dominated, distorted all knowledge, (philosophy, religion,
policy, economy, history...), at the point it could be their center,
their
axis. Fish ignores water, man is unaware of oxygen, (except if they are
missing), the shepherd that discovered the first diamonds of Transvaal
offered them to his sister: she saw them like ossicles.(1)
In order to find the causes of this ignorance, we should determine the
causes of its success.
Bottero,
 |
"Either
the priest perceives taxes
or the tax collector sings the mass"  |
|
"documents cast in a mould... modelled on a definite design... being able to be transmitted in time... each reader can modify them deeply, adapt them to its personal optics... transposition, magnified and sublimated reports/ratios... No ethical concern, calling upon a moral conscience... only ideal of happiness, only code of conduct: success in one's corner..."
Charpin
rather saw the role of the "priest", a school trainer, a manager of
human
resources.(3):
"...the capacity to design and decide the leader of the nation, "the humility which Hammurabi displays, would be explained by a need to be legitimated by the clergy...", new approach, the transmission of the religious traditions... the formation of futures scribes is the duty and privilege of the clergy... extension of sacerdotal castes ... in Mesopotamia, writing never exerted a critical function with regard to tradition, as in Greece, but was on the contrary at the service of its perpetuation...As from the appearance of writing, Nabu, (and his "nobles"), entrusted the management of the empire to the "satammus". Bankers? a much better term would be "general farmers ", (perfectly described).
Jaspers
represents
the philo-teacher minimum that any school should acquire, and the
maximum to be expected of a philo-professional. Friend of Arendt, and a
replica of our "Alain", he had the vision of
a
first "axial", (without seeing that it was about the
second one nor the need to find the root of this innovation,
"satammism").
By a completely static sight of the "religion", (forgetting to include
the two great names, joKriss
and Mohammed), he unchained an enormous little-rature, reflected on
Internet, (5)
(with pillaging by preachers and would-be-sophers), causing total
incapacity
to understand satammisms".
 |
I
therefore point out that I
am the product of an evolution for which I propose the name of
"hautism", with
a training
never seen before,
that won't exist another time, (6) I
struggled ten years in the claws of the last three Torquemada , (7)
I
irreversibly ridiculed the pope, and his red mullets... (8)
|
2/
Reasons of the success of a criminal system(9)
Rather than to compiling anecdotes, "à la manière
of
needy laïc@theists ", let us follow the advice of Celsus, (2d
century
of our era), "Describe them and they will flee".
2.1
This "social system" respects a logic,
and, nowadays, can
still give lessons of logic:(10)
passage
from hard slavism to soft slavism, by diffusion of
ignorance
and superstition,
creation
of great properties, (whose owners wanted to reside at the "court"), and
creation
of a society in three classes, still existing the day before the
French revolution, (and even after):
2.2
The satammist system uses a creativity really minimum:
Out of experience and instinct, the "satammu" is cautious of
creativity,
but a "champ" in inverse,
(improved
recently by "alternance", (16)):a
great help to solve the central and capital problem: to
have an answer always ready,
(if not he should have to flee). But this technique is limited,
being
an
exclusive culture of "memory":
a
destructive technique for the mind, (applied to "pariahs"(17)
maintained in misery and in a "holiness of pacotille", a
total
amorality and the refuse of all the laws of civilization, (see
response
of Israel to the judgements of UNO, the International Court).
a
justification by "historical rights" through the souvenir and
attraction
of a golden age, ("To live
like
YWHL in France")? (18)
With an internal competition resulting in:
awful
contests of doctrinal and moral purity, ("you prohibit the cat, I
prohibit
the rabbit...")
cruelty
between satammisms hunting the same cattle, cf
lupissimus...
a
trust in "one's election", ("and the gates of hell will not
prevail...),
2.3
The results is a capacity, (kind of ADN):
to
adapt, benefit from the circumstances,
The 20th century showed the adoption of the "paleo-satammists" rites
and
liturgies, resulting in an extraordinary case of 
analogies:
"secular arms", "pontifical recognition", "penitence",... Who
was
astonished when the 
historical
leader
of the "paleo-satammism" went to
CanosShalom(19),
to remit the "keys of Petrus" to an under-sect one hundred times
smaller?
But the Tarpeïan Rock is close to the Wall of
Lamentations:
a henotheist sect, full of monitheists, agnostics, cannot carry
out
without the Chrestic mammoth!
to
turn over desperate plights to one's profit
The 20th century showed unthinkable examples, (and still not
understood).
|
Who tried to understand how the 'yidEastern', who, during the Great Negationism, (1945-65) seemed "to accept what they deserved"), could turn over the situation and dominate the 'yidWestern' (20) that, having almost destroyed them, fell down in a dangerous sleep and a total oblivion? |
|
satammismt Creativity" is strictly
null: it was just a question of
finding
the application of the penta-millennium recipe to new
circumstances:
"the
rabbis explained me why we waited 40 years to understand the CHOSA..."
2.4
But, in my opinion, the true cause of success
is the assistance of the so-called
atheists, cases of Sartre(21),
Arrabal... decided to destroy the "paleo-satammism" and serving the
"neo-satammism"
without seeing it... not thinkers, just "little-rateurs",
like
Voltaire, Renan, Combes, etc... indicating, unconsciously, the
point
not to exceed.
3/
But how, why, did I see myself?
As seen before, I jumped on the discovery made by great minds that
could
not understand it.
 |
Why did I tkink the
aristology
ridiculous? Why did Descartes
seem to me useless? from the first day! Why did I prefer English
logic rather that French churn? Why this mania to understand how each profession thinks?(23) .
. |
3.2
Meeting MesoPotamia
Antiquity and the "Greeks of the Miracle" became a mystery as
attractive
as Atlantis for others. Refusing to teach the sorbonosophy, I
started
as an English teacher, (hoping to break the Saussure-Wittgenstein
puzzle)
and having like any professor, to teach some "orphan courses", I
asked for Antiquity, an easy course, made of tales and drawings. At the
beginning, Babylon was Persia-in-Cruelty, (until I found Bottero
and C°). Up to what point, did Poidebard
influence me, I don't know.
Some geographical forms facilitate slavery, the Egyptian tunnel, the
basin
of Mesopotamia, the peninsulas like Italy or Greece. Nothing so in
large
plains). Little by little MesoPotamia supplanted Athens, Rome and
Memphis. Babylon presented more puzzles that all the rest of the
ancient
world; and Darius, more than Augustus, Périclés and the
Tank-Amons.
While the Pharaohs never exceeded the Cedars of Lebanon, how
"Barbarians"
could conquer the whole Egypt, dig the first Suez Canal? And
this
survived in the empire of Alexander, specialist in promenade-conquests
(24);
then in the Chrestic world
3.3
Rimbaud-Trobriand period in deep Africa,
Instead of losing two/three years for a "diplomocus memoris causa",
I went to Africa as a teacher, finishing with the construction of a
factory,
really by myself, (the promised chief-masons gave up in less than
a fortnight). Up the hill, a "Vercors", of no economic interest,
but the risk of revolt brought a company of the Legion to build a road.
A "fada" settled immediately. In exchange of half-trucks
of
sand he introduced me and I was "initiated", an unusual occasion
to observe still pure ethnic groups..
 |
One day, the "fada"
gave a note in a split twig to a "postman", willing to
carry, but not to touch "paper transmitting thought". This "carrier of thinking paper" felt the terror of the Babylonian peasants for the bricks with memory, their respect for priests with divine knowledge. Few revolts, (first analogies of
the "progroms"),
hardly
repressed at once. The successors buried their
predecessors,
first. Each rebellion increased the fear of the "satammus", (note
14) |
3.4
and perhaps the phenomenon 'hautism"
The " psys ", by facility and prudence, ignore this type of autism,
common
in Newton, Vinci, Einstein, Darwin... We have the mania to put order
everywhere,
hard or soft worlds, and we refuse to swallow the wild idiotologies
made
by Shamans during five millennia. Myself, very young, used to
say:
"the priest
thinks
that... The teacher says that.."
This
indifference enabled me to follow an impossible course, so dreaded by
the
Pontifecal Establishment that all the entrances were sealed...
I
just explained my "unbelievable
course" to Pote Paul@Cujus
and
he tried to shuffle the baby...
4
/ Chances of success of "neo-satammism"?
This novelty is a total change without any change, just a
re-distribution
of all the functions essential to the goals of the original satammism:
to put "obedient cattle" on the "market" , cattle multiplying without
revolts,
nor even committing suicide... Exactly as from the Nicea
Concilium,
the emperor confiscated the authority, therefore the richest bishop
imposed
their "theology of justification": Athanase, Ambroise, Augustin.
4.1 Logical
obstacles
to the success of "neo-satammism":
"what
a brain invented, (in a delay of
5000
years), can be demolished by another brain refusing 
Aristotolo-cartesianism,
returning to the logic of true Greeks, (the logic imposed by the
appearance
of the Computer).
Argument sufficient by itself but completed by two facts:
Failure
of Dark Ages: " if 'paleo-satammism',
(supported by Aristoto and Placon, developed and improved
during one
thousand
years), couldn't hold the road, what are the chances of a wild
elucubration
improvised by a ignorant ?"
Lesson
of the Bey of Alger: "the
satammu calling another satammu to his help could have his throat
cut of...".
The question is "how to
'cap'
chrestinism with the help of Islamism!"
4.2 The
practical
obstacles to the success of "neo-satammism":
Here, we have a problem surely solvable by the neo-logic imposed
by the computer. It will be necessary to start with rewriting all
knowledge. I started for philosophy, religion... Should we await
the final synthesis? not necessary in the modern system of decision:
| it
is perfectly impossible to have all information necessary: it
is
better to ignore the "dead-line". a
manager follows the course of the Shuttle, and compares it with the
"plan of flight ". any
information appearing after, becomes an occasion "to falsify, in
order to fortify gold mollify"? |
|
Moreover, like any "hautists", requiring to solve all the encountered problems, (case of Einstein, Darwin, Newton...), my problem is especially to find again lots of facts and comments of which I did not see the importance at first sight. Therefore, let the followers remake my course and "BREAK!"
4.2.1 Can one
transform henotheism into monotheism.
25
On the basis of the best assumption, ("already strongly falsified
therefore
strongly fortified"), "satammism" was always a "henotheism"
and
never made any effort to come out of it. "Chrestinism",
itself,
would still be always one horde of
agitated preachers,
fighting each other, without the intervention of Constantinus
Imperator
AND first pope. calling all these people to Nicea, he stopped the
disorder
. Chrestinism became the mono-henotheism of State, "only religion
authorized
in the empire", 26 without any
concern for the rest of the world, (no missionaries leaving to Germany
or the Indies in that time).
Constantinus eager to end with the imperial successions starting a
stupid
war in the four corners of the empire, understood the tranquillising
role
of a Religion of State: this "first pope" succeeded since his own
succession
was reduced to a "massacre inside the seraglio".
But the great Constantinian mystery is the creation of
"jews of the pope", "JidiPis",
an operation as mysterious and camouflaged as the mystery of
Zorro
Babel, (at the origin of the Messianic legend). Maybe, the first
pope
feared a return of the "historical
Jews". Leaving to his "JidiPis"
only their "small Talmud made in Yabnev",
the first pope remitted the two Testaments to his bishops, that
engraved
it on the front of churches, (only reading authorized to "cattle"), and
confiscated even the biblical first names.
The first work of the Nicean bishops , (preserved in their present
oath),
was to pursue the "heretic" bishops. Idem for the "JidiPis"
exclusively "Jews-hunters"
at the beginning. Who provided these Sunder-Kommandos? The "Yebnevites",
repreneurs and re-writers of the Babylonian Talmud, (a nice case
of 'doublet"), not received better than the "Chrestini"
by
the "Jews of empire",
(do you think starting a pagoda?) Confirmed by the "current
henotheist branch", presenting
"Yabnev"
as
a genial foundation act and explaining they have ceased selling
YWHL,
"because Chrestini took care for this...",
(sic, easy explanation!) Today the disappearing chrestinism would
allow them to pass to "monotheism" but not question of opening
the
gates: "Too many people on one business, nobody gains anything",
(quoted by Braudel).
(A parte: who starts
two searches:
it
seems that "only the laity manage to
create a really new religion").
27
what
became the "true Jews", invading Rome directly from Babylon,
without setting a foot in Palestine? their ADN concerns us! and we must
reconcile contradictory documents revealing a Constantine more
twisted
than three Concilium. 28
But let us continue
with the analysis of the "conditions
of success of neo-satammism".
4.2.2 How to fill the "Rule of Satisfaction",
|
|
the
old one, (in total decomposition
as
much as the
pontifecal buddha), and the
new one, improvised, that
envisaged
to use the old one, (traditional in any company: an
'informal'
flow chart beside the official one but, much more powerful!) |
|
the
"chrestinus cattle" is smelling a the wolf in the sheepfold?
The
bishops refuse to obey at the "priesterast
trick"?
"Secular
Arms", (politics with a small foot!) are tired with the ridiculous
daily interventions ?
the
"laic writers", too much solicited, are at the end of their tether?
Did
auto-divinized communautarism cause Islamic copiers exceeding their
benefactors?
4.3
The Analogy of all analogies:
The new formula must preserve the chrestinism, to avoid a return to
pre-Constantinian
anarchy. The problem is "How to put Rome and associates at the
service of a NewShalom, how to curve the christic-hierarchy without
killing
it"? Easy to find this "double helix":
I
shall start with the "International Reconnaissance", exclusively
reserved
to the pope. Paul@Cujus lost it while
granting it to Kurt
Waldheim. How to reformulate it within the "neo-satammism"?
Confiscating
all the "honors" imagined by
humanity to
create
heroes. As "YWHL" gave all the Earth to the satammus, they
possess
the Nobel Prize, (curious Nobel of Peace, remitted to
Rabin-Perez-Arafat...),
the invitation at the Borbòn y Borbòn Parliament
for
MarauQui, Chuàn Chullo or the Chinese Dictator ... (even Camp
David
become a substitute of Rheims!).
But
holy Poussah himself must be comforted by the new formula.
Therefore
invitation at the Italian Parliament, then
MonQuignon and
Chodronnette
run to its jubilee, and everybody to Lourdes! When a popish gibberish
at
the European Union? (but they have just refused the chrestic mention in
the Constitution?)
NewShalom
has become a kind of cesaro-papism, combining Vatican,
Wall Street, Stores, Refuge...), Order to Paul@Cujus to come to a
new
CanosShalom, under caudines forks ! with remittance of the keys
of
Petrus.
Three-religions,
a recipe that seemed "genial ", (all is "genial" today!). This
trini-nut had existed in Spain? (nobody could show it to
me!).
It could even provoke a pre-Constantinian anarchy by amalgam of all
"religions",
(meeting of Barcelona, a copy of Assisi).
The Mahommedan bishops elected by Cesar-Quasi in his Nicea-Party show
no
hurry to persecute Ramadan and C°! These last
fellows
know how to play the "more elected than me...": "You prohibit the
cat?
I prohibit the rabbit..."). After demanding head-cloth and baths
for
women, now separate pissing-rooms, refectories for pupils; later
a
auto-divinizing an "true anti-semite law, à la Gay-Sot"...
Communautarism
is a Pandora's box. Hand over the invoice, chapter "debt for next
generations".
The ready-made abogadillo rapidly understood: the first pope had a
Gestapo
and SSs. Let me save my brilliant future. Listening to the
Gospel:
" If you're fired in BeauVeau, flee to Berk-cy... "
The
modernized recipe of the Barbudos meeting the "Barbarian": "Who
holds the shepherd holds the flock".
The "Barbarian",
(converted
"à la Clovis"), obtained a constitution protecting the "Rights
of the Church". Modern forms: who
wrote the Veaulian
Constitution ? the new "Humans rights"? Who legalised the "Rights of
KSDJs"
in a Parliament practically empty? a theo-coco-logian, (used to
stick
electoral posters at two o'clock in the morning). Last but not
least
in this "pagode of Constitutions"? Gis-Car-Decline on the
youRopean
Constitution!
We connect with another satammist trick, the use of "laity":
"Secular
Arms", the "neo-satammism" are claiming the popish right to
create
modern Carolus Magnus, Nabot-Leon, Francoco, Pinochet... (who
created
Hitler?). The formula has been improved to control them by
electoral dead-lines, ( the new five-year period, a progress for France
but the USA period is much better). Candidates are chosen young and
naive,
(case of Anzar, Bambi Zapatero, Blaireux...) and
they
disappear quickly,
(Fifi Gonzesse, and even
Koln...) Gay-Sot
is typical: a brilliant minister sucked to the balls, then sent
to
"oubliettes". Did
McHarlot or Mittereux
think to facilitate
the careers for their spermatos against disappearing without a noise?
let
us examine an alternative: "young secular arms",
Pissing
Pups, (kind of Copt monks or Spartan nazi-cubs). L'Affaire Garaudy-Pé
Pierre enabled me to say I knew the recipe and "l'Affaire
de la Faisanderie" did not take to me by
surprise...
An example is "l'Affaire du RER", Eluséen, MonQuignon,
BeauVeau fighting for the maillot with red peas and the title
of deserving proselyte.
|
Today the FranCochonnery
is as disgusting as the FrancoChonnery. Both facts are possible by a
neutralization
of authorities, and they point to the 1945 horrible sentences:
Let give them a territory and let them live together". |
|
The
New Great Inquisitor
interests me, as I spent ten years in
the
claws of the last three
torquemaDios. The model of Oradour s/Glaoui
could not wedge McHarlot but later caught up with Mittereux;
and even RothFric. I gave up "intervening" in the ClitoNéant-MoniKaka
Affaire, an awful resemblance with the procedures of the
espaÑazie
Curia:
Paul@Cujus was authorized to offer
them
his pontifecal consolation and a curious white box. Other copies?
The
New Index firing the new catechism and definite tool for
Voltairian
and agnostic Profs, "Enseignez
le fait religieux"). Who knows this mysterious Nicki
l'Obstacle
granting the Imprim@Tours?
"Laïco-goys":.
"Chrestinism" always used a lot of "laity", remunerated in this
low
world. Long list:
The
original, and mortal, and collective sin.
Just
as the "Xfs" had crucified the joKriss, all the " goys " have
The
Confession, correctly defined, "technique of generalized
information,
the wife denounces the husband, the children denounce the parents...",
and the neighbors denounce their neighbors: l"Affaire
de la Faisanderie cumulates tele-threats and
cochonneries
of any kind. Really little to stop the
mobilizable masses.
Confirmation par la confirmation
des rois et présidents, déposant leurs loupiotes à
Dash-aux-Schwitz...Dern des derns? les
"rougets" entrant en conclave pour élire le nouveau pape,
récitant leurs litanies et les KSDJs de France récitant
leur liste de "martyrs"... 4.4
Pagodas of analogies inside the Great Analogy:
All these analogies will take place in the
parallel "neo" versus
"paleo":
KraPaul@Kovie, (recall!),
shepherd going to CanosShalom to save his flocks, (and giving the keys
of Pétrus)? just an analogy of BadinTer defending France against
Sharon-Asia, as Rothchild defended it against Hertzl, with a remarkable
use of "the Affaire of
the long-recoli 75", (transformed into an "Affaire Dreyfus",
after 4 years of search; ending as a proof of "fascist France").
The three have in common the incapacity to solve the problem
definitively, because none wants to saw the branch
that carries him: to
imagine Paul@Cujus retorting: "Who
made you Xf?" to the "KSDJs"
singing to him "Which made you pope?",
(and blackmailing him). Was he pushed to the Vatican because his
adventure
with the "Judith hidden in Israel" was known?
Your first training is to document the "pagodas":
"satammus",
"joKriss",
"lupissimus",
noodigms,
" secular arms "... Excellent for mental training, but cut
out from a reality in continuous auto-creation. The dynamic form is
elsewhere
and much more creative, (one can better understand while thinking
of the phenomenon of the rumour, the "scandal mongering" or
"calumny",
all much employed by "satammists", (see "Affaire
de la Faisanderie"): I was called "comunistateo"
in espaÑazie, then "racist"
in France.
|
Francoco shouting at his balcony:
|
|
Butterflies that
changed the world
analogy between
the
worlds "hard" and "soft": he requested a rabbit and paid with one mark:
we expected twenty. But his Mark was supported by a Mauser. That
was "legal forced course". This parallel seeming to exist
everywhere,
I immediately appreciated Dawkins and his "meme", a theory a
little
limited but a perfect support for a probable parallel between
material
and ideal worlds.
5.1
The Butterfly
of Tarse"
An example of "soft-butterfly"
is the idea of Saul de
Farce,
who,
in a vision, understood the monetary potential of the
Messiah
manufactured
by Herod-Pilate.
He started a fight that
cost him his life:
while the
group
of Yaccoub,
(historical brother
of the Jesus), protected by Rome,
succeeded to calm the
Galileans: "the
Messiah came, do not seek any more!",
(and the group did nothing else!), 
Saul wanted to sell in the
whole
empire
:
"the Messiah came,
he will reappear,
prepare to receive him!"
Affaire
settled by Yaccoub,
using the Roman as his "Secular Arm".
The combat of Saul and Yaccoub is traditional
between two "satammus"
aiming
at the same "cattle", (see pagoda of the "lupissimus",
with Cathares, St. Bartholomew's Massacre...) The mechanism is active
under
our eyes, even in Communism, (a complete "religion"): competition
between
Stalin
who wanted to save the revolution while
Trotsky wanted to extend
it and manufacture submarines with long operating range. Liquidation of
Trotsky, "à la Saul de Farce"...
The joKriss created by Saul was practically inexisting: some letters
stuffed
with general information, but without these documents, the pope would
not
have existed and JesuShalom would have disappeared, like Carthage or
Alesia.
Saul thus recovered and saved the group of the Historical
Jessouah
that sent him to the gallows. 29
When
Saul disappeared, the "episcopes" put up extremely well,
already
"pares inter pares", they will evacuate and
recovered30,
exchanged.31
The analogy of the three synoptic is easily explained, (like our
bishops publishing their own
catechism), and the
theories of two fellows, (Chrestinic joKriss and historical
Jessouah),
are strengthened.
But
the "Historical Messiah" himself, started, (with the assistance of
Herod),
by recovering the work of the Baptist, and a lot of quite
cumbersome
sicarii.
Baptist,
(beheaded by "secular arm"
as soon as Jessouah got the command), is also avulgar reprenor
of the idea of the "Messia ".
The original Butterfly is found easily: 32
Zorro Babel the "farmer general", escaping Xerxes, (nice
reverse
as usual!), fleeing first to JesuShalom, then, second escape 33
to Chryselephantine and creating of the Messianic myth. The Galilean
"cattle"
swallowed the story!
|
|
CQFD: a perfect illustration of the lack of ideas. The "satammist" sticks to copy in chain. But there is always a "preceding butterfly", missing at times!. We therefore start our dynamic play, (compare now with the admirable reconstitution of the life in Precambrian times): |
|
5.2
Looking for the "missing Butterfly"
Studying the two "prophets", from Wilnius and 34
from Tarse, we saw the perfect analogy on their monetary
vision:
"One goes to put full the excavations of them"). But if Jeshouah
made by Pilate and copied by Saul is perfectly known, it is necessary
to
look for the "butterfly" originating the CHOSA. I think I
discovered
it, 30 years before the prophet of Wilnius, when the Wermacht
invested
Minsk, (1943), through the arrest of my doctor.35
I had to change my definitions and proposed "yidWestern" and
"yidEastern",
separated by a line on the Rhine, safety or death according to one's
birthplace,
(the French "Xfs" being "yidWestern" 36
and the Gestapo ignore them... In Holland, all were "yidEastern", with
the possibility of a curious cultural exception, the "cultural Xf").37
How to explain this vital distinction? (or mortal?) By an
evolution
easy to notice. "Expulsions", (England 1292, France 1392, Spain 1492)
had
created two formulas of survival: in the "expelling" countries, 38
power was left to the Exilarque, (Rothchild being the best example).
The
Constantinian formula , ("JiDiPi"), centered exclusively on a " priest
", survived in the East of Europe, the "Pale of Settlement". A
very
curious case is Alsace: "KSDJ", authorized in France first
preserved
the old structures and applied the yidEast methods. Nabot-Leon stopped
them, (by "scélérates measures". Then, to avoid a
clash, the "Portuguese" educated them, showing their post-Isabellian
solutions...
Now call to witnesses, "look
out for the missing butterfly",
(that left traces in all the corners!)
5.3
Return to the Great Analogy containing all the pagodas
Let us return to the original and mortal sin : The TVs singing to the
youRopeans,
You
delivered "Xfs"! What about
the
Americans, the
saviours?
With the opening of the camps, the GIs were told: "For this reason
you
fought!". Why didn't Roosevelt use this argument to launch America
in war? this advert a little before the attempt of Stauffenberg, (since
then and at last, a patriot!), could discourage the proud German army
and
caused the end of Nazism!
My contribution: the wife of a high Nazi dignitary told me that
in
1943, all of them knew that Nazism had lost.
Therefore
the great question: "Why was the
CHOSA
continued?" as accounts
would
be demanded of the survivors. More?
|
Roosevelt
knew, as much as Churchill
and Pio Duce!
(note 20!): The
speech of CasaBlanca is clear!
|
|
The
delayed advertisement of the Italian armistice, (to send a yacht to
Cannes!!!).
"Even
the children ", (received from the American embassy), is an obvious
confirmation
of a first command. Where do we continue, in front of so
many
tracks.
Those
who digested "lupissimus"
think of Rothchild stopping Hertzl, then giving up in the Thirties.
Then events seem to fly towards the new synthesis...
What
about this curious Affaire Rudolf Hess? Since invading
England was impossible, Hitler, influenced by a German theorist, sent
Hess
to propose a curious sharing of the world: the Ocean against a
Large
Reich in the East... To relieve England, Churchill accepted: Hitler
invaded
Russia! Who had the vision of the final solution? (the Gestapo settling
the "Pale of Settlement"!): The "butterfly of Roosevelt"? A "butterfly"
with a hard tooth for Rosa Luxembourg and Liebknecht; knowing
that
in the Comintern was so full of "judeo-marxists" that the list was
never
published!39
Total
air superiority, plans of Hitler remitted at the breakfast of
Allied...
Russia stopping two months in front of Warsaw: Guderian conquered
Poland
and France in so long a time!
Imagine Patton or Montsabert in command! But Eisenhauer and
Montgommery
were gentlemen, not benefiting from Staline's problems. And they
had discussed about what Hitler should do: an insinuation almost an
advise,
a plan, committing suicide.
Lawsuit
of Nuremberg? Fast hanging and burying, (Franck ready to
confess
but the others would have followed then started confessions all over
Germany.
Is this too late?) Once again, we seldom started a search with such a
mountain
of explosives in reserve ("to falsify, surely ready to fortify not
to
mollify")
Only the computer,
(which has existed for 50 years), can handle this mountain. Now,
5.4
Absolute and suicidal contradiction:
The Monument of the CHOSA in Washington, financed at 60% by the
American
people, (with a curious justification "unconscious repair for the
crime
against the Negroes"!), with a continued pilgrimage, contains a
letter
of Roosevelt refusing to bombard Auschwitz! A suicide, an accusation:
Americans
far much guiltier than youRopeans!
| And before in time, since the prohibition of the "Xfs", (by vision of the consequences of an invasion by "old-satammism"), occurs as soon as 1924, before the arrival of Hitler. With the old recipes, the use of bawlers who divert the attention and takes the responsibilities "Secular Arms" accepted, (see "Affaire de la Faisanderie) |
|
We are always with an assumption of search, (already strongly
"fortified"),
but, except belief in spontaneous generation, it confirms the
existence of a butterfly that explained to Roosevelt the danger
presented
by the judeo-polaque form:
whereas
the "yidWest" was centered on the exilarque, (in USA, the
"satammu"
is engaged like a vulgar cash clerk. More: even his wife is examined!)
Return to the
historical analogies?
To
start by imagining the quasi non-existent Roman religion with with
dimensions of the forms derived from the " satammisms ", practically
reduced
to the Chirak Consul celebrating on July 14 and on November 11.
Whereas
the " Jews of empire ", had obtained an imperial decree exempting
them
of the rites pagano-Romans, why the refusal to sacrifice was so
effective
against the "chrestini"? Regularly, a Roman judge in charge made the
distinction
perfectly and re-shuffled the "religious" questions to the
"priests",
(cf Acts 25: the "Jews" request Saul for their court and the procurator
agrees, IF Saul agrees itself...) Real need to put two points on the
jis!
How
to explain that the emperor Claude, as soon as year 42, (id est 6
or
2 years after the cruci-fiction), by decree ejected the
"Chrestini"
out of Rome. Imagine an equivalence nowadays.
Then
as soon as year 60, Néron re-started human sacrifices again,
for 16 centuries.
One
brings closer immediately to Constantinus who, choosing the Chrestinic
offer, but fearing the power of excluded, manufactured KSDJs,
(hunters
of "True Jews", as Herode manufactured a "Messiah hunter of Messiahs").
This first list proves
that the "Jews of Babylon" could create a system as solid as that
we find today in the USA and in certain parts of Europe... Today:
Look
for the "butterfly happy
like
YWHL in France", which, threatened in its interests and having
enormous
means, can obtain a "national protection". Start building
"pagodas of successes",
not distinguishing "paleo"
from "neo"
with Mikhail of York, Krugger, Rothchild... Me, I add Medicis, (who
pushed
two queens on the throne of France!), Richelieu, Mazarin, the
archbishop
of Toulouse, (Minister of Finance of Louis XVI), Disraeli, Kisinger,
Madeleine,
Simone...
We are as in point
zero, between "civitrue
sation" and "nigger
civisation".40
Already, the
truth
comes out of the mouth of the children:
6.
Philosophy, "an unending quest"
"Philosophy
" can be only a solid, strong logic reflecting on a great
experience.
It is obvious that great philosophers were often great
scientists,
resulting in two types of philosophers: "with and without any
experience
of life ", (curiousanalogy with those Certified
Accountants
able to calculate costs without knowing the entreprise
circuits...)
Now, after a treat: "Creativity begins with a shock!", you
should
be convinced: "Analogy, analogy, all
analogy". You find it everywhere,
comparable at all levels, between microcosm and macrocosm, between
opposite
systems, apparently opposite.
The starting-block for a total change, (not new as the True Greeks had
no other tool, as Vinci re-discovered it).
|
Its only appearance imposed a new type of thinking.
But let's admit the difficulties! ("like changing the engines of the plane during flight!") The return to analogy is the first step to understand. But how to engrave this neo-logic in the right brain? |
|
|
But a dozen
little
NEWSTEINs could do! For you, to prepare as a springboard for your
children, the first and accessible training is completing the "pagodas":
|
racism): As of the appearance
of writing, some
theorician of slavism immediately guessed the possibility of dominating
the "analphabeasts ", to get "human
cattle". Solution improved during five millennia! 41
(for me, it is the key of Economy!)