_
Español
French_EspañolFrench
  |
in the World Two of Popper |
|
I dedicate the following text to Jacques Monod for
his excellent definition, still a little unconscious), of the role of the
true philosophers. In Popper's "Logic of the Scientific
Discovery", he comments:
This agreement doesn't surprise since the "brief" of
Popper was the "method of Einstein"
( described extensively in Einstein's letters between 1920-1925).
The method created to solve a big problem, is sometimes more valuable than
the discovery, who explains us the "method of
Monod-Lwoff-Jacob" that triumphed of the double helix?
|
 |
In this World, my brain accesses the inaccessible World-One, like a robber to create in the World-Three, a museum for Humanity, a deposit where next generations will find libraries, ruins of Rome, the Mona Lisa, (her portrait, not the Top of the Tops), MV2 and the ideas of Einstein, (not his brain...). Albert visited World-Two regularly and broke the status of immutable truth of the "Newtonian gravity". |
But a tree? My imagination, (in World-Two), sees it as a stack of boards, ready for a boat, a Canadian hut, (in World-Three). So? I can reach, destroy a being of this inaccessible world? In fact a simple dandelion provokes questions as "where the life comes from?" and the quarrel creationism versus fixism. Even a being as little evolved as a worm carries the question of evolutionism. Could World-One exist without our mind to think it?
0.1 In what "World" this "philosophy"?
in World-Three, in libraries-garbages, in the shape of empty books
that turn their back for shame: 99% is strictly the gibberish, deserving
the quarter of hour of Wittgenstein, to vomit the remainder of our days!
Comment
commenting preceding commentators' comments.
Some "philosophers" claim to know the reality
hidden in World-One, rivalling with Shamen with Great Book and Sorcerers
of the Great Fetish. That gives quiet profs that ruminate their life long
on the Existence or the Absolute, repeating: "Why
Beingness and not Nothingness?"... Others rummage in World-Three:
"Snow is white IF snow and IF white..."
plus a real preoccupation for this mystery "Bald King of France". And all
turn around the bush, on the campus. And one day, they proclaimed themselves
great explorers, and their "philosophy" an Everest inaccessible to common
folks.
You follow? then you had discovered and invented
the Three Worlds of Popper! you have lived moments where the time stops,
where "conscience" disappears! To understand a new idea, (to compre-hand
is "to take with one's self), it is necessary to discover it; and to discover
it is necessary to invent it. Very easy for our creative fellows, especially
the mechanics, for whom creativity is daily bath! In my courses, they beat
all their colleagues, computing friends included. Now they ask: "Why so
long to recognise the importance of "world-two"? their world. Why no "philosophy"
for this World-Two?
 |
Special mention for the duet Kant-Schopenhauer, (that, with Comte, appears in the two shifts): they thought of "relativity" 80 years before Einstein, by pure logic. I recognise Arthur as my "autistwin", by a long list of coincidences: he had an intuition of World-Two, so young that he remains a unique case in the history of philosophy. |  |
Arthur was the first to underline the dominance
of a "will" upon the intelligence. Should he chain on next questions: role
of the intelligence in the training of the will ... probable site of this
"will"... It could cut the herb under the feet of Nietzsche and his "will
of power", and of Freud with his "psychoanalysis" and "Lacan who speaks";
and provoked a revolution in education, before Montessori and Freinet.
You want an orientation on my "philosophy"? I
approve this minister who understood that scientists lacked "philosophy":
if Laborit, (that I have preached in enterprises as the best specialist
of the "living systems"), had known more, he would have beaten Wittgenstein
to the title of "philosopher of the XXth Century".
1.2 My strange philosophers
of 19th Century, with a "grain"
Darwin, (obviously a "prosopamnesian"), dominates
and guides the Century that discovered Psychology. These philosophers
seem selected by Willful Evolution, that, by this period, arrived to the
last "noodigm" and began the exploration of the last continent, our brain.
For this last jump, Nature hired explorers accepting psychic risks; even
the death of mind, i.e. madness... A titbit of strangeness was therefore
usual and useful among true philosophers of this 19th century: Kant, Comte,
James, Jung, Mill, Pierce were blessed!... Sometimes, the madness was in
the family: Kierkegaard buried half of his family before 20 years. Wittgenstein
was tried only a " financial suicide" but three of his brothers did succeed.
August Comte went deep into "psychOS"
and was saved by his wife from a Bedlam. But, hardly liberated, he produced
his best work, without profiting by this plunge in the unconscious world:
even proposing a ridiculous copy of the religion that it wanted to destroy!
William James used his experience better, falling into ridicule: "My Bergson"!
Jung had more taste, Tony and Sabrina...
Less known, though first to appear, Maine of
Biran, (1766-1824), the "creator of psychology". Because of poor health,
he began his "humanity" at 15 years old, ( as Schopenhauer), when Latin
was used to form the mind, being a mere vehicle for Stoic philosophy through
"Exemplary Lives", (I know!).
Such a mind refusing to change in a changing world, decided
to leave a "monument of his passageon earth..." and could reconcile Descartes
and Schopenhauer:
2. Five Millennia of Thought
in Mendeleiev form:
Therefore, at rare moments of the history, anxiety
could provoke a pure philosophy, then appeared a leader, (Newton),
that inspired a philosopher, (Locke, author
of "Understanding"),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 "Newton's errors can teach
us more than his successes..."
The scope of Locke was limited: Newton's brain
is more complicated and more attractive. Fascinated, like any top-autist,
by any problem, Newton tackled some successfully: his experiences on the
light opens a chain that went till the "Fauves", these real madmen of colour,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And another mystery: Einstein was not preoccupied by Newton's brain. Poincaré was and died saying:
2.2 Before Newton?
Quiet sedentary peoples suddenly run till Assouan
and, with a simple staff, gave the diameter of the earth, (how many of
our contemporaries could do that?) A change in the manner to see the same
things: a new language, synthetic: Euclide is going to reign for 2000 years.
SDcientific terms have changed: time, space, movement... The earth is no
more the centre of the world. And the change is also moral: contempt of
the military, money... help to victims and slaves.
I chose Zénon as the model of all
martyrs, ("... who raises against injustice and
dies for
it"). Compared to him, Socrates,
and also the "Messiah", are pale products of sacristy. Zénon fascinating
by his paradoxes. Had he replaced the tortoise-hare challenge by the moon
eternally missing the earth, he discovered "gravity".
Who fears an eternal fall in a bottomless well?
Maybe the earth falls upwards. Zénon avoided the accusation of atheist
by placing the earth on the shoulders of Atlas standing on a Big Tortoise.
The tortoise? "Que estire la pata", (Spanish saying). I have deduced my
most efficient technique, to throw away centuries of gibberish: "Kick the
Tortoise").
About that time, (sometimes called "First
Axial", but it is the second one!), appeared the "legislators".
The first attempt of "democracy", symbolised by the stone of HamuRabi),
was rapidly superseded by the "satammism", ("Barbarity
under a Divine Mask"), and "technique of soft invasion, of nations
and regions and mansions", false religion and pure policy of blackmail
and fucking. As a symbol, the stone at Louvres, announcing, (in four languages
and 500 years before our era), that Darius had pierced the first canal
of Suez and passed his boats from the Mediterranean Sea to the Indian Ocean.
How could this empire conquer Athens and Assouan? To Greek administration,
Philip preferred the Persian system. Then Alexander could conquer the world.
How did he understand that mixed marriages were stronger than concrete?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Daniel C. Dennett, "DARWIN'S DANGEROUS
IDEA",
(Simpson & Schuster, 1995, page 21:
|
Why is the table of Mendeleiev the best tool for creativity? because it shows the next research to undertake. Do you see one? the most important for us.
2.3 After biOS? The fifth, (and probably last), "noodigm",
Newton used four elements, Darwin-Wallace necessitated eight. How
much for psychOS? It
seems possible to build a provisional theory: let's imitate Managers,
deciding without waiting for all elements. Extraordinary progresses, sparse
but real, are ready to be the springboard to "psychOS": researches in synesthesia
since Luria, bicameralism,
the delay line of Libet, the imaging of movements, intuition of the true
neurologists, the autistic phenomenon correctly defined (by "problem-inside
people" or "problem-inside-home people"). By sweeping largely, by including
all "abnormal" manifestations of the Mind, such as "autisms with known
author": the complex of the Benjamin, the "dissociative children" of Lynda
Shirar, (1996), and, not impossibly, the homo problem..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 The "forgotten"?
All popular manual presents an army of "philosophers",
absentees of this frame. Some deserve a "cathedra bene meritus", like the
unknown poet reaching perfection with one only sonnet. Others equally should
be sent to their place, hoping that the "espontaneos" will reflect before
jumping in the arena, because "professionals are disappointing".
2.4.1 The "Enlightenment".
Voltaire, a anti-philosopher introduced Newton
and Locke in France, with a remarkable booklet, a model of philosophical
newspaper, duly burnt in Rouen. Our 'Lumières"
rejoined the Newton chain when Kant declared Rousseau "the
Newton of the Moral". Could d'Alembert's brain compete with
Newton's? Some "philosophers" want to bury our "'Lumières"? I agree:
that's the first step to put them up among the "'Lumières
of Humanity".
2.4.2 "Lost opportunities"
The "Descartes" of Chomsky, Heid'Higler,
are the kind of texts that I can't read, (an "autist", maybe, can't understand
others' minds?). Therefore one minute of silence for Nietzsche: the Church
demolished Descartes
as much as Pascal, creator of the necessary language for Darwin, life and
enterprises.
In His "geometry"? (call it "algebra"), Descartes
was on the path of "bicameralism", (formulas to left, curves to right).
Had Descartes calculated the surfaces of his figures! Newton couldn't cry
"You call that Geom!" What could Descartes do if not diverted by
this cardinal who offered him the place of Fatty Thomas?
My list of " lost opportunities" is long and
fruitful to detect the causes of mental blocages. What of Vinci
and Schopenhauer with the qualified enemies to excite them? These geniuses
were basely labelled "atheists". "You call that "Definition!"
by two negations: "can
NOT prove
Marduk does NOT exist"!
2.4.3 The "Deconstructors",
darlings of Establishments
Not to be confused with "destructors of false logic", such as Wittgenstein
on language. Spencer of Bono with a black tube and some cardboards created
models of destructive analysis. Realisations? nothing. See text on the
problem of South Africa in "Creative Thinking, towards broader horizons",
ACTA of his conference in Malta. Appointment in Caracas, place of tinkering
at national scale.
Few computer-fellows know that Wittgenstein invented
their " Tables of Pre-Decided Decisions" . But Ludwig rested! Why such
a finesse of analysis did not open on a great synthesis; on an exchange
with Turing, on the possibilities of computer-thinking ?
I label "deconstructor" those that oppose and
recuperate any realised progress. Honours to the "aristos", (Aristocles,
nickname Platon, and his pupil, Aristoteles). Why so many people admire
Platon? Because they read him before being ready, (case of Schopenhauer).
I thank my prof, that, (as a true philosopher), forbids me all philosophers
before 30 years old!
The first "platonic love letter" to read, (and
perhaps the last one), is his proposal for the "human livestock". Why this
title of "divine"? it is correct if one knows the "divinised
racism". A whitewash of philosophy distinguishes three levels "liberty":
physical, ( no metal chains); intellectual, (access to the truth without
restrictions); moral, or religious, ( no terror of hell and demons). Therefore,
a child deduces three types of "racists",
"nigger-owners", linked and necessary each to the other.
Platon was the first "deconstructor" in history,
manufactured a "philo-puppet", with parts of true Greeks, What did Platon
think really? I don't know. The Platonician ideas were "saved" thanks to
Augustinus, (the theorist of Dark Ages), who wanted a frame for his really
curious "ideas", (One Infinite cut in Three, Incarnation, Redemption...
). Strange "Religion of Salvation".
Aristote? He "saved" Zenon
and many Greeks of the Miracle, (as Cauchon "saved" Jeanne Arc from total
oblivion). A "deconstructor", persuaded that woman has less teeth than
man, while science was appearing beside his "Lyceum"!
"...Aristote (about 350 before J.C. ), the greatest scientist of Greece antique, placed mental capacities in the heart. he considered brain only as an organ of cooling... About 350 before J.C, the Greek physician Herophile (known as the father of the anatomy), made a remarkable advance on the nervous system by dissecting human bodies and animals."("PSYCHOBIOLOGY, Rosenzweig, Leiman, Breedlove, BOECK, 1998, page 23).
2.4.4 "Prout - Bidets"
I was told and taught that "any French word is English". I need and
therefore keep "prout-bidet":
a "fucking, farting, horse-robber".
So, to sell his curious ideas, Dr. Gustinus manufactured
a Platon, who had moulded a Socrates, with remains of the "deconstructed"
True Greeks. His disobedient pupil, Aristote continued and we know Zénon,
as we know Jeanne of Arc, thanks to Bish Cauchon. Then Thomas d'Aquin expurgated
Aristote and delivered an "aquiquinade", ("enquiquiner" is to fuck!).
Descartes mounted the Thomist saddle and tried
to re-write Thomism against promise of Thomas' throne and glory. Then Descartes
was expurgated by Reverend Malebranche, (the only philosopher of the Great
Century, born and died at the dates of Great King Sun!). Spinoza, because
of excommunication, escaped John-Baptist, (Wittgenstein had a book on "Theosophy
after Wittgenstein").
It would be easy to unite these "horse-sophers"
riding over 25 centuries: Bonald, Mun, Ozanam, Bloy... And lately Guitton-Science,
Lavinas...
Always the same argument:
2.4.5 "Your definition
of philosophy" ?
For all "philosophers", I have a recipe:
2.5 Searching not searching
searcher...
"Cognotivism" occupies the last half-century
and deserves a mention. It appears, (1956), at the same time as "Artificial
Intelligence". We hear "cognotivist psychology", "scientific psychology",
(immediately condemned by Kant), then "philosophical psychology"! (why
not a " philosophical philosophy"?) Psychology will be a "science", after
re-defining "science", in the frame of "psychOS".
In this Persian market, everybody's welcome:
psychologist, linguist, computing people, neuropsy, creactiviste and "logician"...
During the war, USA prepared valid physicians
in six months. Therefore, cognotivist committees would be more efficient
by selecting the useful parts of each group, by creating "trainings", by
determining gifted subjects for the last exploration.
My "Integrated Management", (1965) starts when
I construct a factory in Central-Africa, alone since two chief-masons gave
up. I had to lead the whole enterprise in my head.
Any discovery in one area can be a jump in another:
therefore the great problem of any cognotivist is the update of knowledge..
2.6 Note on Comte and Kuhn
Relation with Comte and Kuhn? the orientation
is different. Priestley-Lavoisier and
Branly-Marconi, and Fleming have brought huge modifications in our
material life, none in our minds. My study is this change of mentality,
indispensable to solve a problem and later to be adopted by every body.
The scientist is always a philosopher. The opposite is not sure.
3. Obstacles met by the thought
Our language follows the great rule:
3.1 The danger of words
Two amateurs of "good stories" laughed madly
while exchanging numbers They had numbered all known histories. Their world
was impenetrable.
The "value" of the painter is not the "value"
of the banker and "valence" must be learnt in a labo. To use known words
to present a new idea leads to confusion while new words rebuff. A word
does not transmit a knowledge, it evokes two experiences. It will be useful
to remember this to create while entering 5ème noodigm, "psychOS"
It seems that the polylinguism cut the link between
word and object: "object-bread" doesn't need "word-bread" and can be "word-pain".
But our brain is not just a stock of labels:
it is full with structures.
3.2 The danger of "structures"
How do we obtain them? it is a Byzantine quarrel.
"Ideia" in Greek is first an "image. What difference
between "idea", " mental image", "concept", "representation", "set", "structure",
"system"... Jungian "archetypes"? Where are they
located? in the left brain?
We have known for a long time that the mouse
has two brains and believe that our useful brain is the left; especially
days of examinations.
I do not think that the right brain, even accepting
a second role has renounced to hold "structures". I have discovered them
during a "trance": they contained the rules of the tribe...
The true problem? To remain "creative". Which
"structures make me creative, help my decisions?" It could be necessary
to control the "structures" that enter our right brain.
4. Internal agreement needed
The right brain fascinates me, because it is the artist, sentimental,
because it detains secrets... Apparently it is rather difficult to manipulate
it.
When Schotty cut, and found "two
consciences", it revealed the problem of two brains
under a skull, easier to realise that putting two heads on a calf: Nature
has anticipated the dualism with enough suckles under the cow. Then the
calf will be a efficient grass-mower.
Two heads on a cat? Each convinced that it should
catch the mouse before his neighbour? Some agreement will be necessary.
For example, one works on odd days. Or watches the arrival of the eagle.
A solution our bicephalous calf should adopt; in case some ecologist should
bring a wolf indispensable to natural balance...
What should we expect of the similitude of the
two brains? Some sites at the right seem "lazy", "retired": the zone of
Wanacke is silent but can speak, when excited in a laboratory. Results
are artificial... Jaynes deserved, in 1976, the title of new Freud for
his interpretation of "voices".
Another experience, in "mind-reading", is a great
advantage. If you don't follow, at least stop seeing your clairvoyant,
correctly described by Benjamin Franklin:
5. Receipts to sell new ideas.
How could René Caillé convince "specialists of Africa"
of the existence of Timbuktu? Can one know a country without living in
it? without leaving it sometimes? Can one see by eyes of another? (like
Lévy-Bruhl).
In enterprises, (places of problems), each
one has twenty solutions. When a consultant arrives, the first visitors
are the "Saviours" coming to negotiate their "ideas", (sometimes against
the job of the CEO!). Had the firm tried them, it would have disappeared.
List your visitors, the "deconstructors" of the following month, already
offended when you ask to analyse the problem.
Any discoverer tramples a confiscated area, explained,
defended, forbidden since millennia, disturbs an apparently balanced world,
defensible and logical since corresponding to the logic of the group.
Any discoverer is an intruder: The DG of a "Consulting
Company", to whom I explained my recipe for "Integrated Management", (in
1973), declared: "You cannot tell that in enterprises!".
Effectively, he invoiced "men-years" and could continue by "improvements".
My formula could be installed in some weeks.
The solution of Albert is called "Hiroshima",
and I have produced bloody, bleeding, "démos", in all areas of knowledge,
philosophy of course, but data-processing, management, religion, policy,
history, (hunting "skeletons in
the drawer" is my favourite sport!)
Jesus' Gospel is a web of incoherences, (thousands
of "brains" tried and failed to explain them in 2000 years). Nevertheless
a child settles the problem by imagining himself a governor Palestine in
the first century. "A Messiah? I
invent one!" (then, he finds Jesus' true name:Zorro
Babel)
Analysing how and why thousands of "brains" swallowed
and sustained the "Messiah phenomenon " is a first-class training. Most
of my "demos" are ready-made IQs for VIPS (Profs, Preachers, Politicians...).
Because:
6 A true "Theory of Mind",
cannot be different from any scientific theory: it should:
_-_
integrate new advances, (like Schotty's, Libet's, synesthesia...)
_-_
and anticipate consequences.
6.1 "Analogy, analogy, and
everything
analogy".
I spent part of my life on "trainings", "chainings",
" logical games": "flip-flop", "hard-soft", " millennial crossing"... In
what measure, these "games" created in me these dynamic structures who
seem the spring of creativity? Finally, I noticed that all my logical games
use the same structure: analogy. Dozens of books on "Theory of Mind" and
only one on "Analogy", old and disputable, warning us against this form
of thinking, "dangerous because not always false..." Have we another frame
of thinking.
Once more, the principle of the Nature: "make
new with old". From languages, (that "spacialise" thought), to the rigorous
and most famous syllogism, (just a pagoda of three analogies,
see its use in the Dark Ages!), one must admit: "analogy, analogy, only
analogy".
My "integrated management", (1965), is strictly
the recognition of a common analogy to all documents of all the enterprises.
It was then possible to introduce in the computer a unique structure, a
"record", ready to be handled, compared, added, etc... (what began with
a unique document to capture all data, (demonstration). All reunited, of
course, in a table of Mendeleiev.
I summarise all my discoveries by a capacity
"to recognize
analogies there and where nobody saw them";
as Branly understood the importance of a glow, (it contained the TV and
Internet) or Fleming saw the future of pharmacy in a dust. I think therefore
that the most wonderfull of all machines will never think, through incapacity
to find "analogies". But the computer will be better to store, compare,
reject, check add them... (and even to solder some mandibles).
7. Possible contribution of
a "top-autist"
At the age of 12 years, I was adopted by four
"locomotives", the size of Clémenceau and Citroën, two already
important in 1900. They educated me "à la Diderot", stuffing me
with Latin stuffed of Greek Philosophy: "Do three things at a time,
rest by changing works..."
I had realised the ten obligatory years of primary
schooling in SIX YEARS AND EIGHT MONTH. "Solemn Communion" with exemption
of age, fact never met. I was as handy as Newton
and as ambidextrous as Vinci.
My "locos" wanted to realise the "vision
of Uncle Cardinal", (in 1905), to save his France:
manufacturing a journalist-priest at the level of his nephew, "Clémenceau",
("Manager of the best made Newspaper
according to the French government"). From the Marquess,
they borrowed the castle of my village; hundreds and hundreds of youngsters
were received and examined. After 32 years of expenses without feedback,
they reverse the formula: instead of "young Chretin
conditioned by a mother decided to insure his last days as the first lady
in a the parish", they decided to insuflate religion into an
hyper-gifted! ("High Functionning Autism" did not exist!). Like pouring
boiling water in a sugar cup!
Therefore when 12 years old, I wanted to understand
"How do their brains function?";
then, "chaining": "What of Zénon,
Darwin,
Poincaré, Einstein?"...
To whom among my four people, I owe my "Theory
of Conscience". Probably to the most 'intelligent' person I ever met. Limited
education, by his father, she thought "as a man". But she had preserved
his " feminine intuition". Id est: she perfectly combined her left brain,
stupidly qualified "male" and her right one, not a bit "feminine". To solve
a problem, she thought "strongly" of her father, ("emptying her brain,
avoiding ready-made ideas); and ideas came it. I have adopted the "prayer
of the young baroness". A way to stop the chatterbox! What is the mechanism?
provoking Libet's half second? or at least giving a mawimum of time, the
possibility to repeat? I can pray at will, seeing the baron in front of
me, saying: "Le petit me déçoit..."
A strange judgement by the "psy' of a Trade Chamber
seems to confirm:
8. CONCLUSION
"Intellectual progress
usually occurs through sheer abandonment of questions, an abandonment
that results from the decreasing vitality and a change of urgent
interest. We do not solve them; we get over them...",
(Dewey, 1909).
Popper says that solving a problem prepares us
for a more difficult problem. Probable, but we improve our capacity to
see problems that escaped us. What to do if, a frequent case, our illumination
reveals one dozen?
Working in Nigeria, a director asked about
|
|
An apple for Newton,
a compass for Einstein, shells for Darwin... For me, a horse in 20 drawings. |
 |
 |
 |
|
"If top-autism was the source
of any progress...",
"If 'genius'
was only a well managed excess of anxiety?"...
Note: What
"space-time" in the last noodigm?
Space-time, as seen previously, occupies a primordial place in science
and philosophy: It is the container of all the objects and permits their
movement. Knowing that my "nobel in management" is not recognised
in sorbonique, even though it contains more research and promises of progress
than one hundred doctorates, I jump on any text containing an intuition
able to sustain my theories, for example the marvellous
text of Dennett, (who should adopt "NEXT").
Could a biological time come naturally to the mind, by "analogy"? Next?
What will a psychological time be? Something like the Bergsonian time,
(just the remark of a dentist noting that his/her customers do prefer fucking
to roulette? Yes and no. Because it is necessary to take in account that
the corresponding language will be reserved to people with the same
experiences, not backward but super-evolved people. Therefore, it
is necessary to look for true spiritualism, (no place for the products
of satammism), of great artists. And
I jump on a text explaining that autistic children could contribute to
study this mystery. The authors, apparently had not at their disposal
budding top-autists, like little Albert. But would they recognise
them? could they help them?
Denys Ribes, "The enigma
of autistic children ", Pluriel 1992.
| "At
birth, space is not given to the child anymore than time... The first
thing noted by Meltzer is that time is at standstill. In our
3D. world, nothing exists if a fourth one, time, is not
present... Frances Tustin explained that the black hole seems eternal,
because all temporal continuity disappears in it. Is this stopped
time in autism one consequences of the troubles in a mental
construction or a defence that avoid existence? Anyway, Meltzer has
a terrifying sentence: "Time passed in autism is lost for the maturation...
"
Page 78: "The child doesn't construct a surface; he oscillates around one point, what only outlines a line. A circular time goes together with a surface... The autistic child comes out of the circular repetition by a minute progression as if the circle thus transposed itself in a spiral permitting a progression... " |