_
-CREATIVENESS?
CREAUTISMESS?
To prove his formula, Einstein
asked " just a little bomb... " from Roosevelt. Zénon
went till Assouan to measure the diameter of the earth; Newton waited for
von Brown's rockets. Schopenhauer
and Rousseau were revealed by the contests of "Sociétiés
Savantes" Fermat proposed problems to mathematicians. We, "prosopamnesians",
we recognize each other telling our inventions to survive. Could
these recipes extended to "autists"?
My strange foreign French
saw me as their "Français des Lumières". Error! They
have disappeared. At best, I was cloned on the last of this species. Now
this famous Century lasted only 40 years, built by forty guys, half with
a foreign imported smell. Almost all autists; with a mania, never
drop a problem. The recipe to be a "genius": collect all problems,
" walk" them over.
I propose another solution that deserved me a
strange question:
" Why this mania always to start with
the more difficult problem?"
I answered:
"once this problem settled,
the others have disappeared... "
I consider you, (by the only fact that you
read this text), that you see our "curse" as a march towards autonomy,
as "a brilliant management of an excess of anxiety". Therefore
let's look at the "geniuses", not like "autists" but as ordinary people.
Logically, what problem should be studied
first? "most urgent, today for humanity?"
"To make the computer think"? (no, rather
easy).
As a President of this Committee of Reflexion, I elect Bachelard,
" philosopher of NO", (a rare French philosopher able to compete manually
with Popper and Wittgenstein).
The history of thought, during the five last Millenia, is
the history of people who said "no!". Therefore, the
most urgent problem for humanity is the
fifth rupture, (corollary:
" How to create a Millenium
of Enlighment"?)
1 / "Philosophers of ruptures"
Locke,
(deciding to study "how did Newton's
brain work"), said "nuts" to the "Dark Ages, and to
the "silly logic" of syllogism, (piling up three empty analogies
in a hollow pagoda). He starts modern, Kantian, philosophy, causes a schism
not between "science" and "philosophy" but inside " philosophy ":
from now on, there is a philosophy which accompanies science and
another which fights it...
Schopenhauer,
proclaiming that intelligence obeys an irresistible force,
breaks completely with all the preceding philosophers. My "autistwin",
by creating such a system, contradicted himself, hope that
"somebody,
one day, would solve this paradox..." Dangerous call: " Pop
the NIETzsche!", and " Pop the Freudy!" And Schopenhauer could not understand
Darwin.
Seeing mathematics
as "a tautology", Wittgenstein,
explained that any language, however perfect, imposes a structure of thought
that blocks thinking. He left to Popper the care to explain the
mental mechanism of Einstein. Popper himself can be improved: "Solving
a problem prepares us to solve a larger problem"?
Better said: "... prepares
us to SEE bigger problems"
Surprise? We have the
framework
discovered while cleaning "philosophy".
2 / Which will psychoanalyse Newton?
Locke, badly prepared to solve the " puzzle of Newton ", hardened,
made quasi insoluble the problem of " engineering "; even Poincaré
will break the nose there. Thus, I arise my small " plays logical ":
2.1 Regulate T.
It is not a question any more of asking the secretary to classify
but eliminate those which exceed it, well-known receipt of the freudism
in action: one copies the pioneers, (Charcot, Bernheim, Bleuer and Bleuler...)
then one makes disappear his intruders, (especially Pierre Janet, a little
unstable like its predecessors), and one blocks any progress.
2.2 " the reverse " and the " butterfly ":
Labelled " to sprinkle ", (that of which I always laugh, by expecting
" a high-civil servant " promotion), I be entitled to a consolation: the
birds of my kind made sense of the thorough detail and an enormous capacity
of synthesis, two extremes reconciled by this " butterfly of Hawaii ",
able to cause a typhoon in Florida. The creativity feeds from one anything,
a gleam of Branly, a dust of Fleming. I claim that the Middle Ages, (correctly
described), accepted a mortal blow in a cell of monastery, when one scorned
of the economic history imagined " accountancy in double part ": the Florentin
could control his counters of London but the State could control the Florentin.
Since the " psys " impose their " tests to us ", why not " reverse
", to return their balls to them, while creating of QIs for VIPs, (for
Psys, Profs, Prêcheurs, Politicards, Périodistes...)? and
to locate any inspector on a " Scale of the Test ". I await them in Obvious
Logic, and General Culture.
3 / Of our " philosophy " oozes your creativity:
Thus, instead of vivisecter the brains which dazzle us, (Zénon,
Newton, Darwin, Einstein...), we will imitate them, without leaving an
irresolute problem, by risking the boob the enormous which learns to us
more than one success, (conscience, "it is for when that is badly!"),
while
choosing enters
a " philo-history " in one century delay, or two millenia...
a philosophy " which-pose-the-problems " (if they are seen!)
an efficient philosophy, leading to the creativity; who walks
the problems between outlines, and solving some, prepares to see unperceived
problems. It is not the role of philosophy? then let us say " bases-for-thinking
".
The creativity is clean autism. As for the painters, the study of
the predecessors is essential, if it finishes on a true analysis and the
presentation of a better method, all a " philosophy ". Being only one reflexion
on its experiment, it will be better if it has been reflexion on the whole
of the thought for 5000 years. With a perfect description and a comprehension,
an apprehension of large creative going until benefitting from their errors
and their temperaments " difficult ".
3.1 Schopenhauer as bases Re-departure.
Of course, I take my " autistwin " like mascot for this last conquest.
Model not to be followed to the letter: after a revolutionary " intuition
", it falls down in the " disputatio ", the mixing, the encyclopedism.
Its great error was to attach its system to the Kantianism whereas it was
to prolong it. It held the bicameral system, perhaps thanks to his father,
very " disturbed ".
Perfect setting forms some by Spencer de Bono: "the
brain does not explain, it manufactures explanations; and it is sacrément
different!", (but Sp. de Bono limits " brain " to the left lobe,
it talkative!) Extraordinary denouncer of the mental structures which mislay
us, (the black tube, small paperboards...) and able to announce the danger
of any progress: "which blocks, (and is opposed to), any following progress...
", it was unable to propose effective doctrines, (serious for a best-seller
in creativity!)
4 / immense Program of search:
Me, I stop: I created the framework, néo-noo-logic, with
recognized examples, admitted, of the " demonstrations ", (shingling, bloody);
in any branch of knowledge. I thus have a skewer of solved problems, in
philo, religion, data processing, history, economy, management, and even
painting, (and to trust of my Joconde proposal!)
What to prefer?
My integrated management? ( the famous M.I.S.)
The puzzle of joKriss? (skeleton N°1)
" multi-to bush-hammer-thinking "?
To redefine all the words, Re-to write 5000 years of not-thought, especially
the biographies with dish water... Detection, protection and recovery of
the children of the NEWton-einSTEIN type, (in exponential progression).
Definition in our manner of solving the problems, possible extension to
the " Normal-Types "? One Millenium creation of the Lights, price of little-erasure
for " books recommended ",...
AND
TO INCLUDE/UNDERSTAND THE AUTISM TO EXPLAIN IT...
4.1 I start the pump?
- "If
the children autists have a special manner to solve the puzzles, we hold
the means of recognizing them... "
Capital question since it would prove that the autism is a psychic
fact, (software), being able to result from thousand physical causes, (hardware),
including a case with cause NULL.
Me? I always hated all the plays, especially Kickouilles and Beats-Balls
them. I prefer my "logical plays",
to program my right brain, (me am recognized a facility to take 40 events
without links and to join together them in an unexpected synthesis).
- "Which
knows skilful children dyslexic of their hands like Newton, Popper, Vinci?"
(and Bachelard and Count, therefore able to build a factory in Africa-Power
station. I judge the great painters with their talent of portraitists and
the " philosophers " with their control of space, " place of meeting of
the eyes and the hands...")
- Puzzle posed with two
buddies of studies, maintaining on the signal-level of their profession
of faith, (but question in self-service): "Which
in synoptibus Judeos vidit?" (it is skeleton N°3)...
|
Hoping that the freedom
of thought and creativity autist always exists in France...
|
|