A New View on Autism

Dynamic
Definition of Autisms

      People with a bizarre condition called synesthesia see sound, smell colors, and taste shapes Neuroscientists think they might open a window into the ultimate mystery of human consciousness,   (Brad Lemley). The logic is excellent, but
      Synesthesia is surely a problem of linking, but pure autism is probably such a problem, (and my 'attempt' to cure myself, proving the possibility of active linking in the old age...)
     Therefore, copying Branly's glow, (that lead us to Internet) and Fleming's dust creating a new medecine), I choose the strange kind of children, very late in speaking, like Einstein, or Guinness deserving Selin Birger...
    Appearing like Athena, ready to fight and win...

__0. "Autism does not exist!"
0.1 A million years, already!
0.2 Autism in strong progression,
0.3 "Making a rule"
1. Obsession for "rules"?
1.1 "Making a rule" by a Little Mason
2. Table of different evolutions,
2.1 Anxiety at the center
2.2. Resistance to suffering...
2.3 The choice of loneliness,

__2.4 Need for Order,
__2.5 Need for Learning,
__2.6 Strange echolalia
__2.7 Auto-destructive tendency
_3. Conclusion-Opening
__3.1 Calmness regained by high fight
__3.2 Extension of the Table
__3.3 Preparing the last noodigm...
__3.4 "TOP-AUTIST", as a success?
__3.5 "He did not worry... "
_4. Definitions AD lib.

____I thought to dedicate this text to the parents of autists who refused imbecility for their children and guilt
_for themselves. Unfortunately, Vinci sees in their desperate fight a sad "analogy", with the remarkable brains, _(Celsus to Voltaire, Diderot to Loisy, Combes, Couchoud...), that opposed to the rise
_of satammism of all kind. As they didn't propose a replacement solution, they just obliged the auto-divinised _rats to put on 'civilised face'.
___I therefore dedicate this page to the "psy-to-come", who will comply Renan's "If only one sector of the _neuroscience escapes to the neuroscience, there can't be a neuroscience". Then appointment with
_this genius that will include the top-autism of Einstein and WittgEinstein, to Darwin's prosopamnesia, to the _prosopautism of Newton and Vinci... "
__ I bring him my stone. My favorite text in my course of creativeness is the "Hard-Soft parallelism",
_chapter "case of absence of parallelism" : the autist children solve puzzles with the more unexpected manner? _let's imagine the transposition of their method into the world of the ideas...

0. Introduction: "Autism does not exist!"
Many autisms? as many autists! Autism is the result of the serpentine paradox of James: "the abnormal helps to know the normal", then this "normal" is used to define the "abnormal").
A progress appeared in AUTISM99, (London), recognizing three groups:
___

_ Kannerians, " Sint ut sunt..., "children that neither die nor cure"; certainly the best known, and almost only studied species...
___

_ Aspergers, species known when protected under a university umbrella,
___

_ "Cavendishers", name waiting for confirmation.

Who indicates the group to be studied preferably? that could hold the key?
AUTISM99 also shows three groups of observers, quite different:
________

_ "problem-outside",
________

_ "problem-inside home",
________

_ "problem-inside"
   Which is best prepared to tackle the problem?
    Only common point to all definitions: "phenomenon exclusively human" , (since the animals are not "conscious", a nice error leading straight to a "cul-de-sac"!)
     "Top-Autism " is, in my opinion, just an efficient use of an excess of anxiety. Today some "specialists" admit it could be general, (idem for "prosopamnesia"), being the result of a natural evolution, ending in an "premature animal suited for nothing ", but a champ of "problem-solving".
    Autisms are consequence of our march towards conscience: human mind was imagined to adapt man to all environments and even to change them, but brain is in great danger during its formation or its wiring, from any "Disturbance Not Specified", any accident, (by physical or chemical causes, fume, drugs...), or the majority of the diseases.
    Which explains my document N°2: A "Theory of Mind" is inevitably a "Theory of Conscience", prepared by a synthesis in N°1: A "top-autist philosophy" nests inside "Popper's World-Two" . based on the rule, (push to the extreme, over 5000 years): "the quality of a definition depends of the
quality of the definition of its environment... " Labelled "asperger for my sense of details", I insist on my ease in synthesis. So? let's sweep in space and time:

0.1 A million years ago, already!
    Did autism exist in the Grotto of Cros-Magnon?
    Probably! Some "retarded kids" were saved by Mothers Courage, (which could explain the higher percentage of autists among boys). Their legendary girlish face made it easy to hide them among the girls but I imagine the storm under their skulls: jealousy towards the brothers, (that the father took along to hunting), already suffering from the complex of Benjamin, from the contempt of the females, feeling abandoned, desiring, willing, needing to draw the attention of the father... these criteria are regularly seen in our "creative", Ingres, Rimbaud, Mozart, Hugo, Manet, Wordsworth-in-Xanadu, (artists, really creative but not "geniuses").
    In that time, the "abnormal" had no chances to survive, less to reproduce. But the Darwinian selection gave them a chance, to use their intelligence. And the abnormal, (inventing the bow and the fire, taming the dog and the sheep, and cultivating their garden), transformed into abnormal those that called them abnormal. And Bardot enjoyed the company of our cave-artist, clever at hunting and fishing, storyteller, great beef-roaster; and they had many children.
    Koestler could teach that we all are "abnormal", descendant from these abnormal; therefore all "normal". All the men, (even at best "socially-educated", the most respectful of the "social-rules"), have a "grain of madness", well hidden and ready to reappear.

0.2 Today, autism is in strong progress,
urbi and orbi, either "hard" or "soft" kinds, by increase of their respective causes. Since the appearance of Mukho, and his brothers of Marseilles, we know that young "Kannerians " can move to "Aspergers". How to generalize this migration? then to generalize on the top-level, the last jump from "Asperger" to "Cavendisher" and to the scientific geniuses? (avoiding the stop at halfway under a university umbrella).
Here is the great phenomenon few specialists are interested in; and less can guide it. Maybe, I have an idea, for the first and second jumps; but I certify that brutal kicking is not good after the age of ten years. One will understand why I systematically search the "locomotives", (sometimes difficult to find, case of Newton). My " engines " impressed me to the point of calming my "tantra".
Thus offer a seat to the "problem-inside top-autist" which shows that "Autism is perhaps the source of all knowledge", because he goes right to the comprehension of the structures of thought.
And once again, I quote professors Cambier and Verstichel, (of Mondor Hospital):

"...progress is often the work of geniuses that... gave free course to THE REVEALING INTUITION of A THOUGHT WITHOUT LANGUAGE. De Zénon with Einstein, lots of examples... " ("The Reconciled Brain ", Masson 1998).

We are "refuzniks", escaping the "social training", "social rules", "syllogisms", all rails impeding a "thought without a language", blocking real thinking, (already explained, one century ago, by Saussure and Wittgenstein). Thank you, Ludwig, for the transition.

0.3 " Making a rule ",
strange title for a book without much interest on the thought of Wittgenstein.
    Ludwig, who suffered from an excess of father , ( while mine was non-existent), shows a strong probability of autism, (according to my personal criteria tackling autisms by the top); surely the aristocrat among autists, since he could hide his "tantra", "colères froides", "rabietas"! Noblesse oblige?
    In 1911, while a future marshal saw aircraft as a "toy", our Babbage of aviation had invented a propeller and was tinkering a jet-engine. Nice opportunity for an aparte, to show that the philosophical spirit contains creativity.
    How does Ludwig reason? he created a propeller which "screwed itself in the air", or better which sends backwards the air found in front, around the tube. Not very effective and this type of planes will quickly be limited in speed. Try sending the air inside a tube, with not a breath lost? And, Ludwig's plane overpasses Mach One!
    Then, one half-century in advance, equalling Arthur, he produced by pure intellectual intuition-deduction the "Tables of Decision", so useful for data processing specialists, (people ignoring the author). Surely the philosopher easiest to sell in enterprises!
    Wittgenstein has other top-autistic features: a mixture of "deficits", (especially of social type), and "gifts", as the capacity to analysis problems, perfectionism of course, and manual skills: I put Wittgenstein among the philosophers able to build a factory in Africa, alone, (Popper, Locke, Comte... and of course Newton and Vinci); and among the brains that penetrated   World-Two, (like Peirce, or Schopenhauer, or Saussure...), but then by translating their vision in World-Three wasted, distorted this vision.
     Doctor Temple proclaims Ludwig an "autist"? I propose an exchange of documentations on the most difficult thought to understand, transmitted by his rare students, (case also of Saussure, who destroyed his texts). What can do a pupil when the professor changes his ideas and contradicts himself? He stops noting. Wittgenstein, for this reason, is a criterion for   "philosophers", obliged to speak about him, without any possibility to penetrate World-Two...

" According to Kurzweiller, (philosopher), (1) "Wittgenstein, is arguably the most significant Western philosopher of the 20th Century... " (2) " Actually the Tractatus says nothing about mind... Computer will go to church for meditation and prayer... " (3) "Many of the leading artists are machines by 2029...", (reported by other philosopher).

1. Why this obsession for " rules "?
    Is it a warning against a real danger? a reflexion on the need to select the rules that we introduce into our brain? in philosophy of language, he remains "l'enfant terrible". I imagine him explaining that "math is tautology" to Lord Russel, (the equal of Poincaré). Why the subtility of analysis found in the "Tables of Decision ", (similar to my recipe for "M.I.S."), does not end into a great synthesis? Turing should have met   Ludwig to speak data-processing; rather than von Neumann. More minutes of silence for lost opportunity...
    More than 35 years, after reducing all documents to one unique record in the computer, waiting for a copyright, I "chained" immediately on a new search, apparently inaccessible: finding a common structure for every "thought", (not that of Newton or Schoppy, impossible!). Examples in "Theory of Conscience".
    The computer "will think as those brains that do not think", correcting errors and lies; id est, will oblige us to think correctly. Just describing how our brain functions. That of a top-autist preferably.
    I therefore ask all "autists", (instead of claiming Newton, Vinci...), to understand why they are not Isaacs or Léonards, Arthurs or Zénons... All top-models for the following generations in lack of leaders.

1.1 "Making a rule " by a little mason:
    "Making a rule" becomes clear, if we stick to the best definition of the young autist, "a mason who decides to build his house without experience nor means..." Dr. Milcent, ("problem-inside home), does not distinguish the causes: "hard" or "soft").
    A suggestion for a revolution in the education of all the children: to provide tools and safety belts without imposing the plan of the house? "The little masons do not silence what they learned"; their right lobe refuses the formation-training which would make them "normal"? But this right lobe must be programmed as much as the left! to receive social rules! If not, you prepare a "explosion of small gangsters". Today, the "psys" announce it but it was foreseeable since a long time: Cassez les niches, on vous cassera les miches...
Break the nests, they will break your chests...
Romper nidos, romper huevos!     The majority of the men accept the rules of their group, ready-chewed. While reading the "Autobiographies of Autists", (Donna...), please note that some of us manufacture personal "rules" for themselves. We seek to tranquillize us by putting order everywhere, even in our moral world. Changing from surprising efforts to unproductive discouragements, we impose rules to ourselves, then to others, and obtain a label: "maniatico-depressive", "cyclothymic", (but it's "outside-views").

2. Table of different evolution
    The kannerian listing of criteria, hyper-described, is perfect to start.
I bring the other extreme. Awaken by a "Man who mistook his Wife for a Hat", but convinced I would never met a single "face-forgetter", I plunged into History and established my "criteria of top-autism".
    Between these two lists, the "criteria for aspergers" of Martijns will fit very correctly. Since "Problem-Outside People" are rather interested in the first category, we can confiscate the two others, and reconcile all of them in the same table, under three chapters:
            (1) "traditional" basic criteria, (kannerian),
            (2) "sublimation" in top-autism, already appearing in the middle (asperger),
            (3) personal confidences, with call to witnesses.

    "Prosopamnesians" recognized each other by exchanging their recipes to survive. I think that this method must be extended to autists, who do not know themselves and do not know each other.
Another interesting point would be to add the "outside view": as an example:
"outside view on prosopamnesia":
    In a course, a "spy" labelled me: "extraordinary absent- mindedness". Now "prosopamnesia" is linked with autism, since autistic children, according to Yale Univ. has this problem. But, I see a confusion between "agnosia", (not recognising a structure, like seeing people with a cauliflower or a hat), and "amnesia", (not recognising an already seen thing, or fact...) This is due to the fact that "prosopagnosians" are rare but all sent to hospital. While "prosopamnesians are not "interesting" though numerous.
    But are "prosopias",   incapacity to remember or just to engrave?
    And the basic distinction for "prosop(amnesia-agnosia)", between "accidental" and "born" arn't doubtful and dangerous? impeding further research... A good introduction to my autistic mania for "correct definitions" and even my mania for a "definition of the definition". A definition offers dull satisfaction and stupid quiet sleep for the mind.

My life and work as a consultant were influenced by my labelling.
I was afraid I could be "discovered" too soon, loosong my status like a poor teacher. The most dangerous people were the "saviours", people with solutions, (refused by the top-management), to save their firms. Logically and happily they were my first visitors, offering help for promotion; already insulted when I asked some time to analyse the problems. I was prepared to meet my opponents of next month...

2.1 Anguish at the center
Rather than associability, (an "outside point of view"), I put the anxiety at the center of autisms, Each of us should revive his difficult moments, divorces, loss of a relative, of his work, serious hospitalization, departure for a boarding school, for the war... and thinks that the new-born baby can live his own events with the same intensity, fear of darkness, nightmares, feeling of abandonment... (Freud, who "discovered sexuality in babies", will accept!)
Being "problem-inside", I think that the march to soft-autism is difficult to detect, then the linking is irreversible and final: engines can't be changed during flight! The "cures" probably come from an "overloading". Many relapses could be explained by a rehabilitation stopped too early, (idem for any remedy!) Apparently, there is one and only one, solution: "to make with", id est pushing towards "top-autism".

2.1.1 "Sublimation of anxiety":
The "psychologists" admit, that anguish is essential to live, to be creative. Too much anxiety causes the mania of putting order which reassures, preparing a fast defense; it ends in "perfectionism", (necessary in many professions...) but also an indifference towards "secondary things".

2.1.2 Confidences:
To earn a living, I practised "jobs requiring problem-solving". I think that my missions, my files were better prepared , my work more excavated. I was called "fouinard", (Nosey Parker")? It led me to work 24 hours, (or 30 days), to end a file to remit absolutely. In private, I am unable to leave a problem without a solution.
The following criterion is therefore a corollary of the anxiety:

2.2. Resistance to suffering, disease, hunger, fatigue
enough surprising for the "outside people", it is rather an indifference to small worries to dedicate all strength to the "big problem" of the moment, to put order, to survive. This is often seen as "agitation", by "outside-observers".

2.2.1 " Sublimation ":
This capacity of work, day and night, found in Newton, Darwin, ( and Edison, the champion, with 60 hours no-stop).

2.2.2 Confidences:
      I remember a surgeon, after an operation, asking to me whether somebody accompanied me, if I wanted a taxi. I answered him: "I 'll return home by bicycle... " Then, he asked my age.
     Agitation? I do not know what it is. A child is capable of Olympic efforts. Just find an employment for his activity. But do not lock him up in a kitchen of two meters out of three!
    My "intellectual agitation " was judged "dispersion" by my prof of philo, who advised me: "Read only good books!" Without giving the definition! Seek it and you renovate philosophy. "Good books are written by good philosophers, easily known by their "good books"...     I wished to work 30 days on a problem, (a solution recomandable in a company with problems!), then leave, (I found directors to call me "cyclotimic" and "autodidact", but none to understand what they could not do!)
    Today, calmed by some problems of age, I am astonished by what I did in Africa; ignoring a 100% malaria, (and even the variant that leads you delirious to hospital). While building the factory, the two chief-masons gave up, and I added their work to mine.
    But, in such stressing conditions, a very bad news caused an explosion, a "dry-tantrum", the need to punish without caring about my interests. then a bad fame. Therefore, when my children were taken from me, because being child, "I did not think of others", I went at my/their torturers, with my legendary obstinacy and capacity of concentration, day and night.

2.4.3 "Outside View":
My mania of "definitions" could explain that some "psys" declare me "scientific", (though a diploma of data processing produces only "technicians").

2.3 The choice of loneliness,
rather a means of protecting one's self, against "parasites", a need which becomes a taste, justified by the effectiveness in work, the refusal of the others to work as much as we do, their need to stop during the week-ends...

2.3.1 " Sublimation "
It results the phenomenon of "life under a glass bell", obvious in the book of Birger, (impossible for a normal child). But see the book of Dr. Diebold, presenting a phenomenon very related with autism: "epilepsy like refuge". The example of American Scientific, (February 2000, the child in front of three screens), seen as a deficit can evolve to a hyper-concentration, (without this capacity, earth would not be explored yet):

2.3.2 Confidences
All my life, I shocked with, and was pested by, by people wanting to make my happiness and fortune, thinking that I could earn more... I always lived alone, (even married), seek no more to convince doctors and "psys" that a person is quite happy with books, pastels sticks, computers, museums and libraries...

2.3.3 "Outside View":
    Some psys, ("diplomocus memoris causa", with right to label and libel), are more than dangerous. They consider the thirst for justice and truth as signs of patanoïa. Worthy sons of Freudy and Bethel that decided to separate young autistics from their parents. Any judgement first judges its judge. Let's use the trick of my "locomotives": mentionning "diplomas" provoked ejection of the fellow. "To do is to be". What Zenon, Newton, Einstein,... had understood.
    This time, I need to answer: all people living alone, rapidly, start turning around the bush and stop being creative. But that's the lot of all Professors of Universities, with an easy pupils and never teaching them how to criticize a teacher! That's the lot of all people in ghetto. Therefore the problem is: "How to continue thinking in any situations?"
    Expecting your tricks to compare them with the mine of mines.

2.4 The need for the same order
I see it as a simple corollary of our anxiety, reassuring because one will immediately find the object that saves.

2.4.1 " Sublimation ":
the intellectual needs for exactitude in the definitions, the arguments; horror of error, lie, fraud.
More difficult for "autism-outside-people", (who should reread the bibliographies of Newton, Edison, Einstein, Vinci...): the need for order changed into a need to set order, (and I lived it). Newton was named Manager of the Mint not for his mathematical gifts but for his honesty, product rare at that time. It sent 22 forgers to the gallows and attended the "liturgy"...

2.4.2 Confidences:
    I am a perfect disorder but, as Schopenhauer furious because the maid had dusted his Buddha, I can't admit anybody setting order in my things, (I would see it as an attempt to set his own order! produing danger in case od an urgent need for an object). In the "soft world", I pushed this mania of exactness until the definition of the definition!
    I need a frame to work. Many people take resolutions, at least on the first of January, always the same since they do not keep them, most popular being stop smoking. I make a new planning regularly; and I stick to them; if not, the Sky would fall on my head. And I change them and I justify these changes, because "solving problem makes you see new problems", and therefore I must plannify again...
    I am a frightening debater: I easily turn an audience over and I enjoy it. With a facility to present the same argument in two opposite, perfectly convincing ways, thanks to my logical game, "flip-flop" symbolized by rabbit-duck of Wittgenstein:

"I believe in God: no need of thomism: who seeks his key in all his pockets? when instinctly he knows it is in the left one?"
Now be Janus:"I do not believe in God: no need with... "

(I know the limits pf "thomism" better than any theologist!)

2.4.3 "Outside View":
I would choose our famous "inertia" and Gauss told of his wife dying, and answering: "Let her wait a moment..." just the time to solve an equation. We want to finish what we are doing, so important to save the world; we want to secure a point that will give us security. Disturbing us will provoke a drama. I was awfully rude with my mother requiring me for a thing of no interest for me, at that time. Maybe, the best investment in my youth, since I got the spanking of my life and definitely learnt the respect due to foremen and "martinets", (our martinet is your cat-o-nine-tails).
"Outside Observers" should learn from Newton the opposite and complementary phase of "inertia-that doesn't move will not move..." We have the other side, like the atom of Einstein, bullet-wave: when we start, let nobody stay in front of us. In cases where, (I admit it now), that my interest was to give up, I choose being killed. And, "auctoritas, ultima ratio", a university diploma was no argument to calm me down.

2.5 The need to learn, (and to solve!)
(mentionned by Donna Williams and Temple Grandin, and...), is the mania of squirrels that accumulate by nature. We want to push back the unknown and to prepare with any eventuality. We collect and file knowledge, the techniques, the languages; as others collect the stamps or make crosswords. This "remedy" is effective: to have ready answers reassure. Therefore we don't differ from "normals" but we have made our answers; and we(ll improve them with the next trial.
I therefore hate all the games, (waste of time, no possible progress, frozen exercices...), but I need to know their rules.

2.5.1 "Sublimation"?
The preceding assertions make possible to connect on a characteristic easy to see in "geniuses", (not obvious at first sight):
Newton, Darwin, Einstein, gave solutions in the most different fields. Though they were limited to some juicy fields and not prepared outside their domains.. With accusation of never finishing anything, (Vinci was so accused by Michel-Angelo): I explain it by the fact that "finishing for others" does not interest us: like quitting World-Two, (still full of mysteries), for World-Three, (to lose time in palavers). After living in World-Two, we enjoy it and flee the "disputationes"of World-Three... We prefer to start on one of the bigger problems that any solution reveals.

2.5.2 Confidences:
     I'm attracted by mysteries, symbolized by the compass of Albert, while any "normal" child breaks the object to look inside.
    In the enterprises, I jumped on the "doc" of any odd machines, sometimes prohibited of visit, (later a mechanic engineer lead me to it. I was fascinated by the "tricks of hands" of certain workers. As soon as IBM started the mass-production of computer, I pushed myself, (in World Trade!) in position of observer.
    Therefore "need to learn" is incorrect. We obey the will of a Nature pushing us to collect ready answers. I thus prefer, "accumulating ready-answers" Thus our need for order and the need to learn, comes from the same source: anxiety. I filed Portuguese, Ki-swahili, the oil technique, a stay in the copper mines, seven Basics, two Assemblers and C... and half of the National Library. But finally, you need to solve all the encountered problems. Thus, I list problems to be solved, which I sometimes solve by the dozen. Finally, my sublimation of "problems-solving" concretized itself in a course of creativity, (which filled assistants with enthusiasm but nobody could apply), combining the extremes, the finest analysis and the most total synthesis. I was fascinated by the dust of Fleming and the glow of Branly, (quantity of such exemples under your eyes, that could change the world...) but I'm gifted for at global syntheses like the reduction of all the documents to one line in the computer.
    The bouquet is perhaps to have reduced all my creative methods to a slogan, "BREAK!", while my challenger in this field, Spencer de Bono, uttered only: "POH!"

2.5.3 "Outside View":
One day, a director told me:
    "Why this mania of yours to start with the most difficult problem!"
    "Because then, all others problems will have disappeared... "
    A manner of ending with TWELVE problems at the same time... On the contrary, you find yourself with THIRTEEN problems.

2.6 Strange echolalia:
Phenomenon normal in the evolution of any child but that must disappear... The child discovers the power of words and plays with their sonorities.

2.6.1 "Sublimation":
Have you notice the place autistic children grant to tales. The story of LINWOOD starts with a child asking for a tale, just an echolalia of higher level. All children adore tales; and foreign language teaching is facilitated.

2.6.2 Confidences:
I spent my life, inventing stories, by changing the least event into marvellous. Even the difficult moments of my life of Manager were solved by a tale, a means to locate my allies, to make people laugh, and reverse the opinions.

2.7 The auto-destructive tendency
Wittgenstein had five brothers, three were successful in suicide, the fourth only lost an arm, (Ravel wrote to him the "concerto for the left hand"). Ludwig was satisfied with a "financial suicide" that Freud would explain like "a revolt against the father". He did it lucidly, giving the dough to his sisters rather than to the poor: "They had so much that a billion more...", (one of them offered her Goyas to her maid, "obsolete, my dear!").

2.7.1 "Sublimation":
I understand that, regularly, Ludwig felt the need to disappear, for a "Trobriand period", as a primary teacher in lost villages, or as a gardener of convent; returning each time so enriched that one should impose this method on all "diplomocus memoris causa".

2.7.2 Confidences
I had my "Rimbaud period", in Central Africa, building a factory, quite alone, (with an initiation in a lost tribe). Now seek this "auto-destruction " among young autists. and great artists.

2.7.3 "Outside View":
     This time, I'll look at the future and the loss for humanity. Nobody is obliged to follow and any "psy" has a simple trick, a certificate of "patanoïa". Ready for more?
    IF (1), in the Grotto of Cros-Magnon, autism was directed by illiterate women for the greatest progress of humanity,
    IF (2) "Top-autism", (appearing through an excess of anxiety well managed) is the source of any progress in knowledge, ending in a public reconnaissance, sometimes after suicide, can we tolerate more geniuses committing suicide before realizing? Can "psycialists" with their so great a science detect "could-be geniuses"?
    IF (3), in 1942, the US created a program to obtain medics in six months with excellent results...
    IF (4) you admit that any discovery of a new world has a price, according to its nature...
    IF (5) you admit that the XIXth Century invented "psychology" thanks to "philosophers" that had a grain... opening blocked by the sorbonists diplomocus memoris causa of the XXth Century...
     Urgent to create a program of true research, with true researchers, prepared for such a research and trying to solve through suffering and trials, without help...
    At least, I have my link to next chapter!

3. Conclusion-opening
The "House Joint Resolution" N° 174 proclaimed the decade 1990-1999,

" Decade of Brain "!     "Decade-ends" in Decadence? Let's suppose for one moment that Top-Functioning-Autism , (the wood Newton is made of, (and Vinci and Descartes), sometimes with a coating of "prosopamnesia" like Darwin and myself...), that Top-Autism was the source of any progress, in all knowledge, since Zénon...
    Then only Newton could explain the brain of Newton and top-autism.
    And for this reason, your philosophers are mute... unable to solve the puzzle of Locke, (nor Wittgenstein's puzzle, its echo).

3.1 Calmness gained by high fight,
The majority of the "geniuses" solved an enormous problem before 25 years. If the solved problem is known and searched by the scientific community, an acceptance will appear after "disputationes inter pares". If not known and not searched by a scientific community, taht doesn't not care for the next progress? Let Newon send a rocket to the moon! Let Einstein burst Hiroshimen! The only way is "bloody bleeding demos".
     My discovery of "satammism", when 22 years, was more than a revelation: a shock leading to "isolation in hospital". Because I couldn't talk, (not false according to the Freudian Churches). Even the more interested were not interested! So I could continue on other subjects, building "bases-for-thinking". My discovery of "Management Integrated System", at 38 years, was a true tranquillizer: instead of the "letter of motivation": "Dear Sir, my wife is pregnant for the fifth time and we did not eat since..." I could " negotiate as a doctor ":
        "Having believed that "the computer is management... ", some companies encounter difficulties... Of course the computer can ensure management as my glasses could see the microbes and the rings of Sirius: after Newton and Young, and..., established the laws of optics...
    What I state is already support by strong references..."
    For me, this second revelation helped me to understand the fits of impatience of Newton, Darwin, Vinci..., towards "colleagues that were no more colleagues"...

3.2 Extension of the Table of Mendeleiev:
It is impossible to create and to see one's self creating. Or simply to understand one's progress. What mind-improvement did I get by practising "morphodimensionnelle", (and even introducing it into the building industry). But I am surprised that the complex of the Benjamin was not studied parallaly to autism. I lived two experiments of this curious transfer on a new person while the "guilty person" has completely disappeared a long time ago... The "patient", programmed by fraternal jealousy, takes you in his collimator, and you've little recourses against this hatred.
    I was really surprised by the exchanges between epilepsy and autism, to learn that a student can have a crisis and only one in his/her life, on the day of an examination. I for one need much more! A first-class experiment not to be missed to know one's self and to know the possible help of "others"...
    When a professor declares that dyslexia i sa problem of wiring   and nothing else, it is an opportunity to establish the indispensable distinction between autisms: "hard" and "soft". The wiring of the brain is an adaptation to the circumstances found in the environment but it is irreversible.
     The cases of parallelisms between hard and soft worlds are extremely useful in creativity and problem-solving. But the table of Mendeleiev can also include the book-makers, to show their merits and limits, can also help to read the biographies with new eyes, (as I will show it).

3.3 To prepare the last noodigm...
I do not know if the next noodigm will redefine "space-time", "movement", "force", "energy". The need is obvious for "religion", "man", "civilization", "value", "rights", "idea", "racism", "God", "crime", "justice", "child", "successful life", "autisms"...
(but the most urgent of all definition is the "definition of the definition").
As much urgent is "currency", social connection which must be defined within the framework of a "religion worthy of this name"! I found remarkable the definition of the governor of the Bank of France, (unhappy candidate for Maij' Triche!):
Money? "a philosophical concept! thus ask the "philosophers".
Your definition of "philosopher", PLEASE!
Who indicates to us why "the great innovation of the next century, a new religion "was immediately blurred into: "the next century will be religious or will not be!"then: "to get rich, found your own religion... "

    Why did the brain of Newton function wrongly in " religion "? Could a scientific language block it when applied to the religious field? Or was it so penetrated by the religious language of the time? "sinner", "confession", "hell", "Christian values", "divine will", (today, the deceptive ideas could be"intelligence", "psychosomatic", "cognotivism "..., which preserve and prolong the errors that they pretend to eliminate).
    Newton himself, (or Einstein, labelled of antediluvian before its death), becoming a proof that the language does block the thought?
    "Satammism" is the problem to be taken with full hands: we have passed the point of no return, with two options, to accept a "civisation of Dark Ages " or to decide on a true "civilization", with a true religion.

3.4 The "TOP-AUTIST", as a success of Evolution?
I have a pretty tale: a small goose with a long nozzle symbolizes the dangers and works of Hercules she must surmount to become the queen of the ponds. Most difficult is the psychic change which she must achieve before seeing frogs like jumping beefsteaks; and before deserving the name of "stork". The autism enigma will be understood only through understanding how a small number escaped of this psychic prison while the majority perished. Then programs in:

philosophy: a mystery to be solved, the language,
neuropsychiatry: a mystery to be solved, autism,
psychology: a mystery to be solved, "genius".

Thereore, we can modify the assertion of Rostand:

" Conscience, an instrument created by Nature for auto-improvement of its Creature, (Deus Creator becomes Deus Ociosus). The purpose of conscience is only to analyze the effectiveness of each action acting on the changing environment , and if necessary to change this environment..."

Today, d'Alembert would say to Magendie: "Make me 'human sciences' on the model of biology."

3.5 "He didn't worry for others?"
(Subtitle: "am I on the spectrum"?)
Inside the autistic species, I am certainly the only one certified by two Courts of Justice! My mother, in an imprudent letter explained an anomaly of my childhood: "Why was I sent to the primary school at the 5 years age 5 months and 5 days? (Which enabled me to reduec the 10 obligatory years to 6 years and 8 months).

And the espaÑazi Church , (by procedure reminding "Bill Clito versus Moni Kaka"), condemned me to total destruction on a sentence of my mother: "When young, he never worried about others".

(However, I had my humane period, teaching in a lost college of Africa, "to know if we had all the same brain", (an idea typically autist!). And a missionnary wrote that it owed me his house).
    Additional crimes: "contacted journalists", (I am the clone of a very great French journalist), and "bad character": My eight years daughter, (so adapted to my autism that we practised mind-reading), delivered to hysterical nuns as the payment for my destruction, and I must attend "politely" the legal liturgy! This incredible affaire enabled me to study the criminal system which produced Francoco and Hitler, Stalin and so many others.
    In order to limit the aJustice of the Middle Ages, the king of spain, in 1884, imposed a "validation" by the Napoleon code. How to translate? "My husband separated me from the Holy Church"? The civil judge took his list and chose: "Abandonment of family, brutality, breakage of object..." Since then, I fulfilled my promise: " If you touch a hair of the kid,
I pète your " commercio of mierda ".     My own destruction involved the destruction of the Messianic sects, transforming the preachers into "auto-fucked brains". I just used two "Skeletons of the VatiCave". Plenty more of them! A top-autist adores collectionning.

4. definitions of autisms:
    I always cried my horror of cuttings and their danger. I found this massacre in enterprises, ("fayolised" by a cutting in functions), in psychology, religion...
    In the past, I had the mania to collect the "appreciations" on the "philosopher" I treated and maltreated. For Descartes, I habve some eighty of them. Nowadays, room for the computer.... Certain " specialists " should purge their remnant of Cartesianism, smelling the aquiquinade of saint Aquinas.
    I tried to fight the consequences of this pork-butchery by a series of "rules", (an autistitic mania, "making rules"):

"the solution of the problem is no more on the place of the problem... ", (a success, while adding:" the persons in charge would have found it!")
or: "If a problem was not solved by the "specialists of the problem", avoid them like the plague... ",
(another success!)

Any definition of autism must distinguish the origin, "hard" or "soft", "physical" or "psychical". It is not easy because these two worlds react continuously on each other. I remain astonished by all the cerebral " localizations " which seem affected by, or could cause a type of autism; and of all the diseases which seem to cause or accompany this " deficit ".µµµ
It is proven that any "conscient thought" uses almost all the brain but raises the question of the conscience in the animals. We deny this faculty to them? perhaps what our definition is " reductionistic "? Once again, we lead to a need for revision and definition for clean of the man, the " conscience ".
I do not see how curing a nondefinite disease, to propose a formation with one " disturbed ", to select a profession to him, (or simply to speak about the autism), without stabilized terms, (how many " psys " distinguish " prosopagnosy " from " prosopamnesy "? type these words on Internet!)

Of all the proposals which exist, the clearest definition was given by the the creator of the word, (Bleuler, in 1911), corresponding to the closed child, refusing to communicate. He did not include there on-agitated children, (perhaps a work for Bettelheim, which made a training course of studies in Dachau: "How " agitated anti-nazis " become " Moslem").
The aboulism would be the final phase of hyper-agitation, resignation. Bettelheim, (and even Kanner!), followed Freud and the parents became responsablesde the autism of their children: I accept like " assumption " to be broken ", not freudaine to be diffused!).
Did Freud want to be avenged for " those which had not received it "? like this Bleuler, creator of the term " autism ", which luii closed the gate with the nose. This last, having made a success of its tender offer on International Psychiatry, was avenged on Janet. Who avenges Janet? It is easy, with a " logical play ", simple " a kick the tortoise!" without same showing the results of the psychoanalysis in autism.

B / the definition which passes nearest? (Dr. Milcent).

" a mason who decides to build his house without experiment nor means... "

It is enough to look at: before speaking, the new-born baby explores his field, imitating the bull which déboule in the arena. Its brain does not contain anything but wants all to learn. But "one rests only on what resists". Any creativity starts with a shock. The new-born baby needs shocks and not too. But as of this phase, the child is not satisfied to learn: he creates for itself operational working arrangements, and " ranges ". He uses the two hands. I like this definition of space, "place of meeting of the hand and of the eye". Why not "meets with the two hands "? I know remarkable ambidexters, (I am with Vinci!). Who finds us how sublimates the ambidextrism in the world software? That gives the most intelligent people whom I met on four continents!
Which stages has to traverse the small mason? can it make its program, change matter, return? certain stages are they bases for a following stage? It is significant before teaching the reading, knowledge recent, abnormal for the brain, using a total means in a sequential way.
But one should not forget the influence of the medium, which I symbolize by tales, like my " Small Goose with the Long Nozzle " or the " Raft of the Jellyfish ":

A full boat children sinks. Some seize tables and of chairs, make a raft and arrive at ground with a capacity, a will to create, survive which will remain to them all the life. With the other extreme, less undertaking, least lucky taken in the hold, will be saved in extremis, with indelible and irreversible marks.

5.1 definitions deduced from readings:

(In company, we find employees who refuse any confidence... Then, one " deduces " starting from the conduits. I treated the Chirak young person in this manner!)...

I take a handbook randomly: I am surprised by the number of Dr. Koch who studied this bacillus:

a. Autism like " deficit of the thought in action and deficit of the emotion "

Kanner, (1943), Hermelin and O' Connor, (1970), Rutter and Lockyer, (1967), Wing, (1975, 1979), Curcio, (1978), Tanguay, (1982), Hoffman and Prior, (1982), Sigman and Ungerer, (1984), Frith, (1984), Adrien, (1986), Hobson, (1987),

B Autism like " deficit perceptivo-engine ":
Bleuler, (1911), Freud, (1920), Anthony, (1958), Goldfarb, (1961), Rimland, (1964), Of The Bay-trees, Carlson, (1969), Lovaas, (1971), Schopler, Reichler, (1971), Lelord, (1973), Gravelling, Brooke, (1978), Ornitz, Ritvo, (1968,1983), James, Barry, (1980,1988)...
Why does it take 88 years to describe kids whom one meets each day? (not found Linné yet? I write a tale to you: "the discovery of the elephant in 36 browsings ") But it misses a " large doctor "! To sprinkle... is half of the species ignored?
Case of reductionnism? Can we leave a synthesis the contributions?

/ One has connects on the delay to speak:

Deficit of the language and the cognitive functions... Characteristics of the aspects of the language dependent on the contexte?Troubles of the development of the systems of the language and comprehension... Deficit of the functions of mediation of the left hemisphere...(does the left hemisphere hold the language?)

B / social Relations difficult:

" Difficulty of extracting from the rules... Innate incapacityto establish the emotional contact... Deficiency in social relation... Not recognition of human like autonomous agents... Time in the comprehension of the facial expressions" (perhaps connected to " prosopamnesy "?),Difficulty of sharing the experiment with the others? Incapacity to design the others like thinking beings?... (are these last criteria definitions of the "Theory of Mind"?)

The language being essential to communicate with the others, let us make the synthesis of two groups: "man? (of Lacan), it speaks!" the child must speak! It was forgotten that Einstein spoke with quatre/cinq years? (myself, one put to me at the school with five years and half. I was surely late according to standards'). Did one forget the results of "the noble hand imposed to the left-handeds person to write"? The refinement of certain questionnaires point out works of désoeuvrés conseilleurs to me, half-compartments of the companies:

"... We empirically selected thirteen neurophysiological functions, which one supposes that the disturbances take part to differing degree with the autistic syndrome. It is about the attention, perception, association, the intention, tonicity, motricity, the imitation, the emotion, the instinct, the contact, the communication, the evolution in time or regulation and cognition... "

Just a listing made by an "outside-problem descripter".