. Anti-Atheologo-Chrestinism

Easter 2005 concentrates:

15th anniversary of my proposal to Curaille-France to use their  tele-time to explain the puzzle of  "joKriss".
10th anniversary of the election of Chirak, (following my blackballing of Baladin...),
Centenary of the creation of my newspaper,  DEMAIN , (not totally desappeared), ^[5] at the origin of my "incredible crossing of the 20th century
40th anniversary of the sequestration-destruction of my daughter by the three last Spanish Torquemadas.

L'aJUSTICE, tarot

1/ the world seen fromTour Parnasse    1.1 Second comparisonof references    1.2 Meet withthe 4 new Evangelists    1.3 Third comparisonof references 2 /Vivisection of a "pétosophe", unaware of it   2.1. Fast examinationof this Atheology argentanaïaise 3 /A  dangerous book, because not always false    3.1 How one becomesa teacher of philo for adults    3.2 Religiouspreparation of Rd Loyson    3.3 Which "Nicky the Obstacle" gavethe" imprim@Tours"?    3.4 Twenty years in " technique " without meeting Wholy Spirit    3.5 How Argentan selects its "Lumières" (Marx, Nietzsche, Freudy,Feuerbach,Vaneigem, Spinoza) 4/ Réponse to a Babbling-compile,kif Gars-Raudy    4.1 Zorro Babel, flying Xerxés, twice    4.2 Existence ofa historical Jeshouah   4.3 This  empty but perfect doctrine of Saul   4.4 A tiny event, destined for a great future   4.5 Constantinus, 13th apostle or first pope?   4.6 The greatest  crime of the history   4.7 ComicoSopherLoyson scolding  inKANTournable   4.8 Anti-atheism, quite different nowadays 5 The data-processing revolution    5.1How knowledge progresses    5.2 Let's determine who has the right to open it    5.3 We live a "new axial "    5.4 Theory of creativity and doctrines of civilization 6 / Students over the World, fuck your fuckers    6.1 Doeducate the professors!    6.2 Philosophy asa  successful life    6.4 Chasing  the butterfly     6.5 Religion, a problem for a  "professional"     6.6 Homage to Poidebard ..

Comparison of references:

ßt, (by my 'coaching'), 2nd, (by the Pope),  3rd, (by  Mona Lisa)  4th, (by centenary of my newspaper),  5th, (by the last three TORQUEMADA),  6th, (mano a mano)

7th, (by a factory in CENTRAL AFRICA) 8th,(by Last Axial)  9th, (by my " forecasts"),  10th, (by B.I.T.and DATAMATION), 11th,(by Internet motors); 12th,(by logic after-computer )

1/  The world seen of the Tour Parnasse

            The world is a haystack hiding a needle as small as the gleam of Branly. Who finds it observes the world in an AWAC. The comprehension of the " satammism " is this key for our time as it was  as from the invention of writing. The " satammism " became immediately the skeleton of the "religions" of all kinds and allowed  the "humanization " of the hard slavism with mission: "to produce human cattle obeying, superstitious, auto-multiplying, without any idea of revolt or suicide". AD majorem NabuCousud'Or Gloriam. The "satammus" deserve our admiration: over 5000 years, these "doctores that pueden contestar a todo y todos ", confiscated all progress, (hardware and software),  adapting to all circumstances and  putting their opponents at their service.

            The world is a Tour Parnasse; the true philosopher resides at the 56th floor and thinks of the 60th. The "diplômosophus memoris caused " is placed according to the rank obtained. To define " philosophy " or to find the "definition of the definition" seems as useless to him as to ascend a floor, (he would move away from his customers attracted by the fascination of the "cattle", (like the Mona Lisa), for a philosophy collecting flops, failures and rebirths, (like the Sphinx).

          The world appears as a line of " bridges-for-asses ", that I call "noodigms". Crossing them suppose more than a "change in our manner of  thinking". Science teachers are surprised when their students settle their daily problems like the great fetichor of the baobab ? They should  examine themselves!

          Why these noodigms, our "bridge-for-asses", are not checking check-points, filtering filters. Everything is twisted by the delivery of "asses-skins", diplomas memoris causa. The great Varsitarian  knows and teaches Darwin but mentally remains "pre-evolutionist". Any scarfed pissie can discuss with him on an equal foot and win a null match, (really, my "rule of T" is universal and "Varsities" become Horses of Troy...

But a brain can deconstruct the construction of another brain;[ 6 ] and even could direct the "civisation" towards "civilization". But finding the key is not sufficient :first do understand why the preceding attempts failed. This inversion of the satammism was announced, confirmed on September 26th, 1993,[ 7 ] a historical date, (more than Marignan 1515 or Waterloo 1815)

      . How to claim oneself " atheistic " and to ignore this first case of successful deconstruktionnism [^{8 ]}) Five thousand years of criminal facilities disappeared; a simple description of the thousand-year-old tricks, receipts and techniques ^{[ 9 ]}. Nowaday,  atheism and theism appeared as complementary, like mould and moulding. ^{[ 10 ]}

1.1 Which introduces a second comparison of references, provided by the vaticaning leader [ 11 ] and by the unbalance resulting from his disappearance[ 12 ].                     KraPaul@Kovie was perfect, (a perfect conarDios). When the catho-theosophers were overwhelmed, the Pole Pope made his super-mistake: to shuffle the baby to two theolosophists against a reddish promise of obedience to pour their blood! Who remembers Con-Gare, (Matois Mittereux refused to give him his birette!) or Bordel' Eyt, both died before showing their tail? (as to say: " Well , Great Bi-Phi-Doc., why don't you appoint an Espaguignol, since they have shitted everywhere!" Therefor let's think of the to after-paulish period. Obviously, the successors will be  young fellows, like Cardinal André XXIII, (he made to his private communion when I solved the puzzle of the joKriss).

1.2 Meet the four New Evangelists:

            As an international expert, on three continents, I saw my "France des Lumières" transformed into a starting-block for little-rature. Danger! The tapeworm can kill its carrier. Some names, like Comte " ^{[ 13 ]} and Ferry",^{[ 14 ]}with an appearance of "Lumières" became a "librarian value", ("Renault "? not commercial!). Urgent problem: "How to preach social and religious cohesion"! A great idea came from an ex-conseillor of Matois Mittereux, St Regis Debray: to reintroduce religious paintings  in the schools. Any child should recognize the Angélus by Millet; and to say his Pater and two "Ave Maria". And me and me ?

1.3 Third comparison of references,                In the Louvre, I met a group of Englishmen looking for the Mona Lisa: «Come along!" - " Are you has guide?" - " No, just a Mona-Lover Guy ".  They liked mydéfinition of a great portrait: "A presence, like Laurence Oliver crying", my theory of point zero applied to the smile. But, I explained the true mystery, was not the smile, but these  millions of visitors coming for a photo with the Princess. As each visitor saw Mona Lisa differently, I deduced that my own view should change according to my mood of the moment or the daylight, (a great moment was the morning I remained alone with her!) I explained that Vinci, a pantheist, had represented the myth of the Great Goddess, (venerated the whole world over), which explains this curious landscape of the first day of creation. In my opinion the young  wife of the banker, is in Madrid.               In the Prado of Madrid you do see a copy of the Mona Lisa. The background  is black, as current in that time, (see other portraits by Vinci!). "Mona del Prado" is really different from the Princess of the Louvre: a young girl in pink and green,  age of Giocondo's wife in 1503, twenty-two.  However the true Joconde's odd landscape is easy to copy, (see, in Louvre, the copy of Goya's Duchess of Cadix by the same Goya). Let us apply post-computer logic and « falsify to fortify ». (1), it would not be the first time that Vinci carries out two paintings of the same subject. (2), Yanez  painted or brought back this "copy": he worked in Florence with Vinci on an equal foot, paid separately. Then he worked for the cathedral of Valencia, in the Florentine style, "con olio fino ". Monna, (in Italian Madam), became Spanish Mona, (which means pretty). Si no è vero...             My English friends were so enthusiastic that I offered "my Louvre" to them:    Beautiful Nani, the top level of painting, (she resided a long time beside Mona Lisa),    Belle Ferronnière whom I call " Next Station, Joconde ", because it already uses  the "poor colors"  used for Mona.   "Girl with a pearl" by Courbet,  and never mentionned: my discoveries,   the auto-portrait of Poussin, surely inspired by the "poor colors"  and chiefly   Madame Pasteur by baron Gros, certainly inspired.         I explained the goal of Tricky Richelieu: the painters existed to transform a burnt village  into a royal exploit! Typical example, the "masterpiece" of Fragonard beside four portraits worthy of Renoir.         Second employer, the monk, guilty of  «mannerism»,  adding red beef blood and military Prussian blue. Eyes pointing at the ceiling,  ankylosed joined hands  .     With this painting of monks, St Debray solves the problem of young offenders. Our "custom tribal chiefs" applaud. El Che makes three turns in his tomb. Me, I am very limited;  at least, I  to avoid a " best-seller " kind "As creative as Vinci". I opened the gate to the " Da Win-Shit Codes ", as the baron opened the gate to an "auriol" when blackbooling  Edouard Ier Herriot, like me, blackbooling  Edouard II Balandouille...          Not easy to help "placonic cattle"

2/  Vivisection of a "pétosophe"
           Preparation of Onfray, (name with perfume  of Coffee-Sophy^{[ 15 ])}, candidate to the fourth atheo-evangelist chair.  "How did you discover philosophy?" - " In the market of Argentan, where I live... " Argens, argentis, meaning silver? it remember  goose breedings;^{[ 16 ]} for the Roman occupants. The ideal place to re-start hedonism. I propose "Falstaffism"^{[ 17 ]}).  the sybarite? I grant him  the pulpit of famous Priest Loyson, (first name? Christian name? Hyacinthe, address? street of the Flowers), He opposed the pontifecal infaillibity in 1870 and created his own business, poetically: "My wife carries a child and I carry a church!" Its church always exists.
            My conclusion? "neo-super-treason of the clerks";^{[ 18 ]} to protect the futuregenerations, I disavow an oath, (never not to finance a charlatan), I buy the a-theolology of Rd Loyson, for vivisection, (Ojalà! let it be useful for editors who suffer from the "dilemma of the Boss"^{[ 19 ]})

2.1 Fast examination of Atheology

2.1.1 Analysis of surface, face: the "fight with the angel ", " Jacob is stopped by an unknown with which it will fight all the night. the unknown wounds it with the hip and transforms his name into Israel ", (me, (fifth comparison of references), I spent ten years fight with the last three Torquemadas and as a philosophical symbol, I prefer my catfish: "Inside, you live but don't see; outside, you see, but don't live..." Dedans, tu vis, tu ne vois pas; dehors, tu vois, tu ne vis pas..." Dentro, vives pero no ves: fuera, ves pero no vives . reverse, everything spoiled!                 As from the first line! "three monotheisms"? As far as I know, any "satammim"  is a " henautheism ", (camouflaging a " monitheism"). The two other religions? Could the will to conquer the world, (by all the means, from trick to massacre), produce monotheism? (Mohammed kif Attila and Gengis-Khan and Mao-Stalin? kif the Crusaders?)

2.1.2 Atheology in Fast-Reading

The first Five pages, (the careful titbit):

        Page 2 " the ontological jackal ", that starts like an scientific paperman: "Great doctor X does exist! Confidentially, he confirmed to me... " Prof  is reduced to a Mauritanian driver, the killer of a jackal:  "He does not sleep any more! Because Mohammed, because last judgement..."

         Significant, let's  establish aright to open it: "Mystical Postcards ",^{[ 20 ]}, a demonstration priest-style, accumulative up to  twenty-four evidences of the existence of Zeus". "I often saw God in my existence", explains Fray Loyson ^{[ 21 ]}. From my experiment, I drew more useful conclusions, the role of the atheism to "civilise" theism.^{[ 22 ]} End with  tirade  on the classical litany: "Who am I? Where go I? From where come I?" ^{[ 23 ]}). Five last pages, (last opportunity to sell):             To the question: "What I recommand to the average workman?", Bergson proposed: "Obvious! To read my bergsouillis!" Modern solution for out-of-work workers in Argentan^{[ 24 ]}? To become "merry, materialist, radical, cynical, hedonist, atheist, sensualist, voluptuous... "^{[ 25 ]} statistical puncture in the middle: I wonder quickly: "You call that phi?"; I foresee the possible disaster in potentia from this défroqué of Coffee-Sophy, ^{[ 26 ]} driving mad these 60% Frenchmen  disgusted of everything, according to French prefects!).
            I see a dilemma in front of this compilation, ( the ordino is far better!):
  going down to his level and  rolling  him in his flour or

giving him the key, the satammic receipt so that he shamfully buries his prose and proposals.

3 / Mysteries of a dangerous book, (because not always false)
        Paradox: proclaiming my mental graving by the sorbonism, " (what Wittgenstein-Saussure had announced  one century ago and Schopenhauer before), and taking the lead because the other philosophers are not better, ^{[ 27 ]} In my time: " If you don't know a subject, you could at least teach it... " Today? " If you cannot teach young people, you can at least publish and get rich..."

3.1 First Argentanian mystery: how to become a teacher of philo for adults

            "Why did not teach at the university ?" (was he ever offered a post ?) - " I  saw the university as a place where you don't think ", (how many years for such a revelation?) - " What can you learn there?"!^{[ 28 ]}) -

" I belong to the 1945 philo-class, (nine years before the birth of Fray Michel), the promotion of DachAuSchwitz and NagaSaki, buddy of som Belaval, (as much experience as Wittgenstein in 1918) [ 29 ]. Four LINES in my time, bergsouille[ 30 ], freudouille[ 31 ], marxouille[ 32 ], xristouille...

        A Philosopher should be judged on his formation, (please, check immediately he never lost his capacity of questionning, attracted by littl-rature, (case of the Pole Pope, of Levinasse), on his professors and his choice of "philosophers". For Fray Loyson, it is quickly summarized. What are Nietzsche^{[ 33 ]}, Freud^{[ 34 ]}, Marx worth like pillars of atheism. They were "atheist" before producing their theories. Therefore no use to support "atheism". As a philoManager, philosophy can progress only with brains reflecting on their own experiment. For this reason the majority of the philosophers are scientists who wonder about their brain, (because theoutput dropped), and they produce "logic". All other true philosophers show a solid training in sciences. These species question the problem of cosmos, society, thedefinition of value. Therefore any knowledge, any activity, (education, justice, economy, policy, history, management, religion...) has its, (limited!),  "philosophy", except accounting, (I will fulfill this gap as soon as possible).
            And I am sure that among the dear Argentanese listeners,  individuals could be transformed into these "Profs with experiment of the entreprise" , that the students thirst for. And the chrestinic moni-makers?  well known woodlice, found as from  Platon and hisAristoto, (creators of the Middle Ages), whom I called "prout-bidets", jumping  on any true philosopher passing by... In the past, our evangelists were called Aquiquin and Bonaventure, Bonald and Ozanam, Guitton and Drewerman... But this last phi-pissing is "godsent": they indicate that the religious problem  is strictly a logical problem, perfectly known of the priests, "A man, if brought up in Christianly, returns to the True Faith at the time of his death". And a first solution appears, (Gambier and Verstichel did not pass far): "Can we reprogram a brain?" (the right brain obviously), not more difficult than to change the motors of a plane during flight...)

3.2 Second Argentan mystery: religious preparation of Rd Loyson

            Michou was a choir-boy:  he juggles with the "improperious"! ^{[ 35 ]}.  He knows the "Jews" were bad with Spinoza  but why ? Because he was the first to reveal a recepe, that nobody had seen before. And today,  nobody sees that this technique is much used, under our eyes, in a suicidal way! (xDoublets), two talmuds, two donationes...)
            He mentions the Church introducing the transubstantation thanks to thearistotology!^{[ 36 ]} ignoring the mental blocking by the aristotology! not caring about who, (why and for what) declared Platcon "divine", nor the perfectionism of Logic, during Dark Ages, (to a point already condemned byAristoto !) ignoring the machine of Lulle, (who finished in an antifada in Bone).Not care about:

How can an institution that supported Nazism still function ?"

(dear Loyson, do understand that Hitler was the "secular arm"^{[ 37 ]}, that  it is necessary to hide the financier). And the atheologist can learn much from the slaves who serve the "Religion"? (the author quote some 100.000 cases, ^{[ 38 ]} some calling for aid on Internet, they do nothing but confirm my descriptions), who can speak about the use of Aristoto to support Aquiquinade...^{[ 39 ]} Pointing out their generosity,  (but mutilated by a mother seeking the retirement of first lady of the parish), I envisaged a recycling in psychology in order to use them ad " social cohesionners ", with the right to marry but obligation "to consacrate" for the last believers , (the Vatican is OK: "Sacraments delivered by an atheistic priest are valid..."

An English author gave an original definition of the "vocation": "Defrost the brain, engrave, then re-freeze... " "Outside-view " without any interest, perfect for the transfer between "paléo" and "néo", (satammisms). You must  know the recipes, combines in these institutions, bargainings and blackmailings.

   Small recall centenaire: the pope who dared not deconstruct DEMAIN, was called Pio el Decimator, a Venician replica of the minable J.P. the First, (the stool who launched Paul@K). Elected thanks to the total opposition to the favourite, of the emperor of Austria, by interposed archbishop of Cracow, (of course an Austrian). The spectrum and the sceptre of Constantinus Imperator, first pope, were active until 1918.

The election of Paul@K starts with a push-push-bottom of a Fouchtr' Asian into Notre-Dame. The risk of a French pope was too great after the minable Pomodori series. Therefore, the pope came from the cold. The present exaltation of the "holy personality" completely masks the history of a " Judith hidden in Israel, who regularly visiting him ", (analogy with the MoniKaka of Clinton, more effective).

      Was this "affaire" known? in reserve, a motivefor the election? (was the putsch carried out by the German and the American cardinals accidental ? significant!) To canoShalom, Paul@Cujus finally gave the keys of Petrus, (disobedient bishop are calmed with a "prêtéraste";  but all could be settled, by lese-majesty). By re-examining the tournament, we easily finds the three phases of my English friend. The final burial really seems a  "re-congelation".
Really, our Loyson is not prepared, (any manager in a "Holding" with 100.000 employees would guess more quickly). Therefore 10/20 for our Argentanese sopher, floor 28th of the Tour Parnasse.

3.3 Third Argentanese mystery: which "Nicky-l'Obstacle" gave the "imprim@Tours"?

              Nowadays, to be published, supposed to be approved, authorized, (do remember "Teach the religious fact").
Why Fray Loyson is not pestered by "pisseux pups", like Garaudy, (condemned by the modern Index, in spite of intervention of the ' more admired man  in France'!). Why no " representations of representatives "?

3.4 Fourth Argentanese mystery:  20 years in "technique" without seeing Wholly Spirit,

without understanding the impact of the computer on the use of our Brain? ^{[ 40 ]} (Of course in Argentan, one manufactures bachelors-gavés-gaveurs). A "psychiatrist", (a "fast thinker"!), has just discovered that a child in contact with the computer, is one year in advance as from the primary school, (I propose this genius as conseillor tomy canon Chirak!).
            Because thirty years ago, at least, I explained to parents: Study the computer just to push your children". They will see the computer, like the telephone, the car, a mean of life. Today, I try to explain, solid "demos" in hand, that the computer changed our manner of thinking!

3.5 Fifth Argentanese  mystery: how Argentan selects its Lights "

page 292: " At the hour of an ultimate combat - already lost... - to defend the values of Enlightenments against the magic proposals...")
            I am astonished that  "Normans" don't know that the French Lights were launched by Voltaire, (model for all profs of philosophy for a report burnt in place Jeanne in Rouen, (preacher Fray never goes there?)). Most brilliant among the Lights, the Anglicans, (homage to the founder, Henry VIII, of awful memory, as Constantinus first pope), Lights in continuous renewal, from Newton-Bacon to Darwin, without forgetting Thompson (worth Einstein, (because to discover the atome  is worth "MV2"); and especially Faraday, (which thought like Vinci, (who thought like Zénon and my true Greeks!)) Extension to all the people having produced their own Lights, China, true Greece, India, Germany, Spain, Italy, (without forgetting the small group KSDJ, (Einstein, Popper, Wittgenstein, Arendt... twice significant since it holds the formula to pass from the satammism to the Lights). Now Fray Loyson explain his support for  the "Lights of the aNormale Sup". Does he  want  the place of the pivot-sophe?)

4 /  Answer :
whereas Babylonian-Biblical framing is easy to understand, (a succession of hinges mpossible to justify), I retain a minimum to be explained:

4.1 Zorro Babel, flying Xerxes, twice:

from Babylon initially then from Jerusalem and becoming the Messiah in 70 weeks of years ". Curious, only Galileans, never deported along in Perse, clung  to this myth, until self-destruction. With creation of the best opposite of the Christic history. ^{[ 41}  This legend, (similar to  el Rei Sebastiao of Portugal) caused a series of false Messiah before the arrival  Pilate and after. And  Loyson unable to see Pilate manufacturing his personal Messiah!^{[ 42}

4.2 Existence of a historical Jeshouah, manufactured by Pilate

             deconstrucktion of chrestinism is a demonstration of sorbonic poverty^{[ 43 ]}. A ten year old kid understands quickly: "Pilate, (with Herod and Arithmatician), to calm the galileans manufactured a Messiah!" CruciFiction is whimsical: how to explain why Pilate makes the impossible one to save the agitator whereas the "priests" require his death! Who explains the vinegar that kills and the corpse that bleeds and

why, in the synoptic ones, only Pilate knows  "judeos"!

4.3 This doctrine of Saul of Farce, perfect for being  empty

(See on Internet: "The chief objects of  thecatholic cult are a mix of idolatry", fortifying this "theory or research". Any practice of the post-computer logic will find normal this abnormal relation in the soft world!)

         Saul offers a paradox: by comparing Acts 16, ^16-22 and 18, ^12-17, the Roman Empire seems the most tolerant and most laic of all  known States. How did it become the most systematic persecutor ever known? a small butterfly suggests an analogy? Should we say "a war of religion for three hundred years"? finishing in a St-Barthelemy number one?

           Who wrote the Gospels? Marc, (and Luke!)? Probably two  fund raisers of Saul going to JesuShalom for  news and making  their market according to the needs of their "faithfuls"...Time to remember that we are in the logic imposed by the appearance of the Computer, that we have spitenaristotology and cartesianism.
            Sure the "little runt", (who just introduced the divine theory of "platonic cattle" in the Gospels), ignored  the historical Jeshouah, and that turned "blessed bread". Its " disciples " went to make their market to JésuShalom like a fishmonger at Billingate. They saw "ready-made food" for fretin ready to swallow a not very different lure, (exactly what the "prouts-bidets" will do with the true philosophers). The disciples of Mithra like a baptism in ox blood? I borrow the cruciFiction. Did Egypt sell to Romans  a cut out Osiris,coming out  of Hell? SAme for the joKriss!  Who doesn't see theanalogy with the  with the joKriss as  a small sun? passing in the streets^{[ 45 ]} .
            All Mediterranean beliefs and habits will be stored there. The emperor became a god when dying? joKriss becomes a  god, (only the Son, not  to close the gate with "True  Jews"!) Why a third god? because YHWHL in the beginning was married, with Shekinah, then camouflaged in Wisdom, Sophie, Logos; and we have three Infinite, compressible Gods.

            Thereafter, addition of  a goddess,  masking the irreductible Great Goddess, known from Japan to the Earth of Fire Little by little, she took the place of Holy Spirit, too asexual to be adored.. ^{[ 46 ]}Marie-madeleine, the historical wife ? transformed into a subjected pute. In the Gospels, we find up to SIXTY-SIX meals. The parishioners awaited the return of the Lord. The new convert brought his money and the "parousiaques" ate it out  while singing.

Without Marc and Luke, the "chrestinism" would have disappeared and JesuShalom would be a Carthage, Sagonte, Palmyre. One became the "disciple" of Saul; the other the disciple of Petrus, (without never meeting him!) But Matthews, probably a historical disciple of Jeshouah? Because there was a "first Matthew", limited to demonstrate: "Jeshouah has made what was predicted... What he has done was predicted!".

       Then the manufacture of "doublets" to make historical actors disappear : Joseph, middle-class, became a carpenter. And Jeshouah became joKriss.
        But Johannes? (probably a Judean having known Jeshouah): a text found in a jug, in a cave, in an island. Adopted to solve a big problem. In the "synoptics", only Pilate mentionned "judeos"! They were needed by the time of Constantinus. Johannes was stuffed with "judeos"! This explains why  the four Gospels could not be reduecd  to one text only .
        Now let us think as post-computer fellows! making a "theory of research", "to falsify" this theory. The "judei", during the Middle Ages claimed, financed the Crusades which were to return their "fatherland" to them. They all hurried to settle there. Sorry for, this attempt "falsify to fortify". Let's seek elsewhere, sweeping broad and far in the past.

Note: a perfect demonstration of intellectual emptiness that reigned in theology during millenia:  http://www.bjnewlife.org/french/bstudy/sermons_52.php

4.4 A tiny event, destined to a great future, the group of Yabnev

            What happened to the group of Yabnev during the first three centuries? (what can happen to amateurs invading  Wall Street with bags full with "Green Backs"?) They were confused with the "chrestini cousins"?  They offered an idea to the pope-imperator? He had to reassure his new faithful, then, analogy:

"Pilate invented a "Messiah" to stop all "Messiahs"; I'll make my own "Xfs" to get rid of the "Xfs"!

An extraordinary illustration of the "butterfly of Hawaii", perfect to explain the two talmuds, the two donationes... the first and last St-Barthelemy..)

4.5 Constantin, thirteenth apostle or first pope?

        He  obtained his power from the bishops? He was the true and only creator of the Church and put it at his command. He declared himself the " Messiah " and prohibited to speak of the joKriss! (Napo-Lycaon tried to imitate without succeeding so much. Henry VIII? a copier that did better than the  first pope). No end of discoveries! However it is at least necessary to examine:

4.6 The most serious crime of history: a "Crime against Being",

500.000 children convoyed to the gaz-chambers! in the medium of the 20th century. And the inspirers were not sought! In the camps, all hoped  that one of them survived to tell the wprld. Then total silence, twenty years of Great Negationism, (1945-65). The "victims" admitted they had deserved this chastiment! ^{[ 4]}

Today, a confusing justification: "Surviving had become unable to tell!" Nobody could understand them". Strange, Annette Franck, (victim of the paternal imbecility then transformed into gold-ashes), was a best-seller. Today, it is known that they continued to speak about it between them. Which secret contract obliged them to silence?

        Meanwhile, dear canon Chirak,  say no more "diabolic", but "sacerdotal". A rugby player, a soldier, a singer, a boxer will have a "revenge". They increase their chances by stopping the combat.

An eliminated Shaman will never reappear! Then, "homo homine lupus; sacerdos sacerdote lupissimus".

4.7 ComicoSophy: Loyson scolding the inKantournable,

            Obsessed by  Newton, Kant preceded Laplace, asking for three billions years for our world, (against 60 millions requested by our Buffon). Demonstration that philosophy needs a scientific layer. Kant had a presentiment of relativity, sociology and I add "systemics"  He proposed UNESCO. He perfectly explained the impossibility to demonstrate atheism ^{[ 48} or theism^{[ 49 ]}. ^{[ 50 ]}

I do consider that there is, in true philosophy,
those that prepare Kant, (true Greeks, Locke, Hume) and
those that continue him, (Comte, Schopenbhauer, Arendt, Bachelard, Popper, Wittgenstein...)
The manner of continuing him is to find an output with the nihilism of our trio atheo-chrestinic, (which seems to beg equal treatment for the three religions^{[ 51 ]}, and to propose the Freudy as a  moral.^{[ 52 ])}

4.8 Anti-atheism, quite different nowadays

            My friend J.L. Mackie^{[ 53 ]}confirms that Kant had guessed evolutionism, deserving, (as Darwin) a place up the 60th stage of the Tour Parnasse.  Mackie ^{[ 54 ]} shows the way of any study on the divine existence: it is necessary to be a referee, (essential but very insufficient condition!) As a true Englishman, he finishes with British humour: "a light advantage to atheism ".
Kant, (too much pietist), did not find the key, the revelation of satammism. He missed his proposal on morals as Comte missed his church.^{[ 55 ]}. But they did what a true philosopher must do, to bring a stone to the building, to oblige us to more rigor.  Because the solution always came and will come from the continuous progress of humanity.

5/  The data-processing revolution
            When did I realise that the computer would change our manner of thinking, more than writing or paper did ? The extraordinary Turing had indicated the way shortly after my birth, reduced to "Which sign will indicate that the computer thinks?". In 1956, IBM launched the computer in mass-production, the forgotten 650. I entered the center of all decisions, the "WORLD TRADE". But others "participated": profs created "cognotivism", fearing the prophecies of the farmer-boy: "The computer will replace all the intellectuals", after saying : " Two or three computers will be enough for all calculations in the world!", (really it is not only in politics that the leaders are badly selected!^{[ 56 ]}) And our profs, forgetting that a problem is solved in only one brain, reinvented the "sex of the angels": "To think, or not to think ". The freudies recuparated cognotivism in a paralysing "theory of the mind".
            A very creative person passes quickly from "How does my brain function ?"  to the "inverse":  "Why the others did not find?" True philosophers are as difficult to understand as the scientists and the solution is to reduce true philosophy to an assumption then to deduce applications, (the "falsify" of Popper, that I completed, as a true philo-manager : "in order to fortify". Finally, I understood  "Locke's error choosing the brain of Newton as a model to create modern philosophy ".
        Logically, I left  World Trade, high-place of mystic mystifying companies: "The rivals have computerized. Sign a big cheque! We'll do our best to save you!" These charlatans spoke about "M.I.S., integrated management ", unable to find it, they completed: "If somebody finds, he had better  to bring it to us..." They had batteries of Cobol-Coders^{[57 ]} and networks of salesmen.

5.1 How knowledge progresses
"Solving a problem ...prepares us to solve a greater problem... "
Thank you Popper, but I prefer:  "...prepares us to see a not yet seen problem ".

When I solved "the integrated administration", I realised that the term of "gestion" was in itself an inhibiting error. And  I was so persuaded that my proposal is so obvious,so logic that some Wallace had found it. I needed thirteen years to admit the contrary, (persuaded that only an English mind could find, I ended with a very good English diploma). You understand I passed my life to examine how each mind thinks, lawyer, engineer, doctor, teacher... All suffering from the same mechanism, paralysed by Aristotologiy rectified Cartésiânism,. [ 58]

              An opportunity to point out how nations progress: when remarkable people locate a "promising" kid and push him, ("Universities" are quite unable to do this!).   I wanted to be like my "sponsors", that I saw with other dimensions. This point of view enabled me to understand the "English miracle", resulting from two classes, some  mentally retarded delivering titles of "sir" and "dame" to their superiors, all coming from low classes.
             I met remarkable psychologists, (rather ladies), but none daring to analyze Einstein.I see two possible answers:
To determine who has the right to open it,
To teach a theory of true creativity and a doctrine of civilization.

5.2  To determine who has the right to open i

In 1967, without wishing it, I met  the last three Torquemada. With time, I "burst'm", (and the chrestinism, prepucinism and capucinism). But the "satammu" never repairs the evil done: it would be the end of the world, (their!)

          Today, I smile at Andre XXIII, successor of Pal Lulu.  While the new cardinaval of Paris was busy at his private communion, I solved the puzzle of joKriss and the mystery of "vocations". ^{[ 59 ]}
            We, hautists, have the mania to make and comply with rules. In order not to help sovietism and I awaited the Fall of the Wall, (that is  twenty-two years), to "burst" chrestinism. Two "auto-fuckings"  legitimating me in front of all atheo-chrestinic ^[60]  as the atheologian leader .

These rights were later multiplied by ten. While the true monotheists celebrated me like a New Moshe avenger of True Zeus, a henautheist, monitheist, maffia threw a Wall street offer on the "paleo-satammism". The turn was announced by Pote Lulu, by tele-threat of tribunal, (September 26th, 1993). General call to  pissing pups; a true socio-religious harassing, (admittance that there would not be a fourth auto-fucking)

            Me? I collected the recipes and tricks of the "neo-satammus". Today, resulting Francochonnerie reached and exceeds the  españazi FrancoChineria .But I have a file on "Déché(Fr)ance" as mortal as my españazi file. Obviously, I leave to the local authorities to determine the cause, (artificial, natural, criminal) and the qualification, (attack to health of people, association of malfrats...)
        A work at two levels, invisible "gnomes" giving orders  and  "pissings pups",  assured of impunity, disappearing immediately if you wedge them in a corner.  If Rothchild instead of evacuating Hertzl had explained satammism, France would be quite different but who agrees to cut the branch that carries him?

Only answer: "describe them and they will flee", (thank you Celsus!). To each persecution, I noticed my survival  to the top, sending by my WEB, a part of the work entrusted to Pote Lulu. And finally, I almost did all his work ! Today the joKriss copy of  the Messiah manufactured by Herod-Pilate is balanced by the CHOSA seen as the St. Bartholomew's Massacre of the industrial age. Remain the last point, the crowning, the keystone, the "cherry on the cake". I leave it to the young people beginning to guess the fucking monitheism).[ 61 ]

             Let them start with the consequences of "expulsions  in series" by the kings of England,  France, Spain. Between those decided to stay, (like the "French Portuguese"), and those going East, towards the "pale of settlement", the final difference will be a thousand times greater than between "papists" and "parpaillots".

Today, the " goys " pay because they thought they were not concerned with this industrial St. Bartholomew's  Massacre. Because Hitler could not kill "even the children".  In satammism, "Crime on crime is worth ". All was reversed by the "revelation" of the prophet of Wilnius, transferring the fault from YidWest to  "euroGoys"

      Not difficult. Just suicidal. With a curiosity: for the first time, an occidental "religion" accepts the atheists, "without-god", agnostics! First appearance of the "atheists-chrestiniques"! As always,as  in all settlings of accounts between satammus, not question of sawing the carrying branch. It is part of poker." the best " gains! Between us, Rothfric did not help France by evacuating the Hertzl column, (with assistance of the cavalry of MonteFiori) nor by prohibiting in the thirties, to import "Xfs" from the Pale of Settlement.
Today, therfore, the only and last point to solve: "Which abominable, unforgivable crime was committed in the Thirties, by YidEast against YidWest?"^{[ 62 ]}

        A Perfect work for Pal Lulu, my buddy of studies, if he wants to help the following generationss, (according to last news, he chose a curious refuge, in this year Jules Vernes, "one hundred weeks in a plane!"

5.3 We live a "new and last axial":           An opportunity was missed  in 1945, at  "the opening of the camps"! Let's admit that the impossible is regularly possible, since, among the billion children delivered to misery, one and only one mind is enough to see what all can see. Enough  finding a kid with a completely neutral mind, (neither theist nor atheist), sending him inside the chrestinic world without, (as was my immediate temptation!) leaving immediately, but concluding:  If  joKriss is not the son of God, I must at least understand this joke!". And without being ejected... (one imagines the conflicts of views between my "sponsors"!)          It's a pity that  philosophers spokesmen of monitheism did not understand how one is attracted in the  net of Petrus,  that very few  will have the courage to leave, and even in this case, will remain eternally "tied up in the meshs", (many preserve their ciborium and cherish it in absence of their wife). Freud could not see that to become a man, a priest should kill his mother !           This explains you why I differently see the worship of the vaticaning personality. I wonder whether the "Polish bunker" did not delay his departure by one day. Like all believers, I would have preferred the Easter Day, 15th anniversary of my text deconstructing  the joKriss. I have always seen my "pals" at their level, Lulu  remaining in the church only "because a "Xf" never gives back what he took..." (as explained to me, during the Great Negationism, 50 years ago, by a "Rumanian ", persuaded that the "YidEastern" had disappeared for ever), that all would adopt the "YidWestern style". I remember Pope Pole Paul, swalling nonsense, then deserving a Wittgenstein Price.           Today,  we attend the last phase, "re-congelation", accelerated because the "reptili" had a strange answer to the Plan of Wilnius. The funeral of Paul Pal is an TV-episode, like the  5th Gospel by Saint Gibson, or the ten broadcastings on joKriss by Prior Mordillat , (practically forgotten today!)   The sufferings of the 264th joKriss, (please take off the  predecessors of Constantinus Imperator!) recall me the millions children who saw their parents dying awfully, (without drugs, because American medical marketing saw them as an infinite potential); I think of the Rwandese children who saw their parents cut with machetes; I think of the Russian children pushed into "horse-glue" and misery, and of billionaires (agnostic!) rushing towards the French Riviera. I remember the look of my Paul@K, the day of his departure from Bucharest after having claimed "the Church properties necessary to itsmission ".   Therefore  I regret my patience: I should have "intervened"  as from the appearance of Gorby. Kicking him away would have been more difficult.

5.4 Let's diffuse a theory of true creativity and a doctrine of civilization.

            For me, the first step is  destroying  thearistotology and describing the Vincian way of thinking. The ppearance of the computer has already changed our manner of using our mind, (for the third time ter repetida placet: "more than done by the invention of writing  or paper, !). Memory lost its importance. In front of a problem it is just necessary  to remind existing informations, (the computer will find it!). I await your opinion on  the puzzle of Gambier-Verstichel: they believe possible to change the engines during flight! It should be admitted that some minds follow a different course, escape the aristotology. I was always amazed by the way autist children solve the puzzles, with the sole structures. I do not know much about their situation: I only  know that Einstein, Darwin and my buddies, and myself, present the symptoms describing these children, in a sublimated way.We see analogies, (kind of structures?), everywhere ^{[ 63 ]}
            Now, I take some risk, for a comparison: how to explain the place taken by thearistotology? Apparently, it is not  a natural phenomenon, just a result naturally taken by the child asking questions.

«Why Julie has long hair»--«because a girl!".

        The syllogism is practically built:

«The boys havn't long hair; I am a boy: ergo, my hair is cut short."

        A " late-talker "^[63b] does not ask questions. He needs to know if he already met the same situation. He seeks analogies, (and its brain never blocks). This possibility is justified by science:

"If all comes from the atome, reality is only one pagoda of analogy".

        And Einstein explained that people only repeat the same song. And Poincaré added his math of Caos,(translated in the nice history of thebutterfly of Hawaii.  This perhaps explains the delay  to establish my "theory", (Planck has a solution: "Teach the young people and to wait until old fatheads go fo the Boulevard des Allongés). The present time produces young "hautists" in a continuous casting. It is enough to protect them. They will pass to the Vinci thought, while working on the "pagodas","noodigmes", "management", "secular arms", "Lupissimus", the lookalikes of the "joKriss", "satammus",...
Even the "Dreyfus pagoda" will passionate them!
        The use of the same recipes by engraved minds makes easy the search. I start a "pagoda of visions"?
Saul filled with wonder at the possibility of fric contained in Jeshouah; or
Shaman of Wilnius in front of the $potential of the CHOSA.
Constantin seeing the possibility of structuring and of using chrestinic anarchy.
Constantin's copiers, Henry VIII who succeeds more than possible hope,
Napo-Lycaon that failed,
(as much as CzarCasi,  the ignorandus abogadillo)

.

Byanalogy, the CHOSA requires a prophet, preaching the "final solution" to whom could prohibit it: Roosevelt, a WASP, which tolerated the papists and the " JdPs " controlling their chamen; Pio Duce, obsessed by the judéo-Marxist,, invading St-Peter place, a knife in their teeth.

         Homage to Pio Duce for his knowledge of "human  cattle" and its mental structure, chrestinifying: let's imagine he adopted Theihard, a " prout-bidet " on bergsouillis!  Now, revise the Touvier Affaire!
         I've  sufficiently shown and illustrated my new method, (in spite of the Affaire de la Faisanderie").
        What I began alone, a dozen small NEW(ton-ein)STEIN can finish it.  Let us seek these brains able to change their spirits", as say Gambier and Verstichel, (supposing that a plane can change its engines in flight!) Or better, let us cease destroying them, "to socialize them".

6 / Students all over the World, fuck your fuckers.

        As very qualified people told that I had predicted everything  40 years ago, (without much merit, guided by Turing), I risk  another  forecast I will not see. I think that "l'Affaire de la Faisanderie" and September 26th, 1993 could be the space-time framework of the greatest reverse in history.
        I think possible to  reverse the "Stalinist centralism" which dominates present the youRope. The Basque Country, Brittany, Corsica, Wales never accepted their colonization, (circoncision?  Himmler had a solution and the incorportable chips will do better!) . I do not see why the rebels of May 68, Picards or Bretons fucked by the joKriss of May, replaced by 20/30 millions "Frenchmen of African origin", would not demand accounts. I do imagine  young Europeans demanding all he light about  the 500.000 zykloned children; and reversing  this reverse.    If the use of September 11th  2001 was the most probable,  the easy one, " Lucky Luke against Watsons", "Good against Evil "; a godsent for Bush, of need of the effective historical devil.

The Good Devil, hyper-intelligent, was immediately grateful towards the simpleton Bushman in need ofsimplification. Kerry, as soon elected would stop the Iraqi adventure asking his army, before going home, to rake Ben Laden's refuges . Other historical structures were quite possible, such as: YidEast versus YidWest, or even  Goys versus KSDJs.

..

              I do not see why the children of Rabelais who  invented mortal weapons, like BD, or  rap@canes, would not learn how to stuff them. I imagine them imitating the "preacher-speech", denouncing the satammist structure and the neo-monitheism in the youRopean constitution. I do not see why they would not create the first tool for any union, a common language. I do not see why they would not train their professors, and demand  philoprofs with experiment of life and enterprise...

6.1 Do educate professors!

        My feeding profession was the "consultance", (supposed to solve the problems of enterprises). I was apparently hyper-gifted but not very interested by the role of small-chief,  I therefore classify my jobs:
those I had to accept from  a "councillor"  reshuffling the baby.
         They could destroy my work; or leave me the sole failures. Therefore, I spent my time "educating" my bosses.
those I did all alone, (almost all  "legends")
          Maybe, my experience and results could help, (if I'm allowed to open it, i'll remark immediately that I don't see much progress in teaching sinc the time of Platon and Aristoto).  A teacher, like a priest: starts with an enthusiasm,  eroded each hour and both will transmit what they find in books. 

I always dreamed to make a course "mano with mano" with Simone Veil, (suffering Twiggy not  triumphing Fatty). A perfect complement. It is the way in philosophy and much of other matters, because today, two things should be made at the same time. That's my point, at twelve years, I had to do three things at the same time.

  And I practised on all occasions, like reading a Spanish novel while listening to news in English. I therefore studied  computing, in English, in England.

6.2 Philosophy as a successful life, life as a successful philosophy

        At  50 years, I found myself the "genius"  not  able to save his daughter, (from three Torquemadas and one juez turned into a francofago by France). But a little phrase was enough  "in little time, you will live under a bridge ". I am chretin but this gift I would not do it to anybody. Thus, have usual, assessment, (including " final solution " to make a success of my life):

0-25 years, to learn, (and to teach) 25-50, to acquire an enormous experiment, 50-75, to reflect, 75-?, to transmit.

the "Affaire de la Faisanderie" did not facilitate, (I could not rewrite my course of management); but "it was not too much paid", (sicut dixit All Bright MadelHaine, 3rd Nobel of Assassaint

6.3  "An Unending Quest ".

        I consider a true philosopher is as difficult to understand as a scientist. I try to reduce him  into a formula and to deduce
some consequences, ("falsify to fortify"). What makes all books, (by nature imposing a final point), a false type within the
framework of post-ordinatic logic, blocking any development. An example would be easier?
        We deduced  a "first Matthew" was dedicated exclusively to show that the historical, (and false), Jeshouah was  the "Messiah " intended to calm Galileans:

"The Messiah has come, he did everything predicted. Do not await any other, any more!"..

Deductions:
Any attempt to export this tale out of Palestine was blocked? Sure, and "manu militari", by "secular arm".
Therefore, no "apostle" leaving or  preaching abroad? No Petrus in Rome! no Santiago in Compostela!
That's big and difficult to swallow? Proofs  welcome!   "Si è vero... ", copying the paleozoologists of Precambrian, let's bet we find traces of this historical Matthew, argumenting and diffusing during thirty years.

 

    6.4 Chasing  thebutterfly:

        Who explains this "escape to Egypt" in the "canonical", "number two  Matthew"?
Matt, 2,13-15: "..an angel said to Joseph... take the child to Egypt. Stay until I tell you... And so was fulfilled what the Lord had  said through the prophet: " Out of Egypt, I called my its". Later" :
Matt, 2,13-15: "After Herod was dead, an angel of the Lord... said to Joseph: " Get up, take the child and his mother to the land  of Israel..."
            As we said, this journey was useful to Mark, in Rome, to attract Roman soldiers returned from Egypt. But Mark had no reason to  introduce it in his Gospel. I smell another  "accomplished prophecy". Correct !  there is a return of Egypt with a new life for the people of YWHL in Hosea,  (11,1),:

 "When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called my child."

        Sometimes, the "achievement" is limited to a similarity but, in religion, any tiny discovery is useful, (quantity
producing quality!) and we find an analogy with sciences: all progress comes from a glow observed by Branly, from a dust seen by Fleming, (I, for one, chose the chip and bicameralism about the year 50). All the Testaments should become a hunting place forbutterflies,continually evanishing. This is not "thinking in pictures" since great mathematician Poincaré himself garanties.

Example: the  comparison between John-Baptist near the Jordan: Mark, 1, 6: "John wore clothingmade of camel's hair,with a leather beltround his waist"  and a description of Elie to the king de Samarie: 2 Kings 1, 8: " "He was a man with a garment of  hair and with a leather belt round hiswaist " (The Bible, Hodder and Stoughton, 1979).         It is easy toreconstitute the historical "Baptist"starting from the processing inflicted to him. To understand, we should  remember that the people believed that Elie would precede and announce the Messiah. The first Matthew  comparing Baptist to Elijahproved  that Jeshouah was the Messiah. Thisanalogy is easily found in the Gospel but the  "Evangelists", not seeing  the interest for their flocks, took or dropped these "details",  contradicting each other. Matthew, (rewritten according to Mark),presents Baptist as Elie himself, (17,13). Luc preserves a small part: "Baptist will walk with the spirit and the power of Elie".  But, in the 4th Gospel, (1, 19-22),Baptist itself declares that he is neither the Messiah norElie...           And so on, for more"butterflies"... It means time and patience. Fast thinkers and "saviours" are the plagueof enterprises and humanity. We should create an Order of the Crutch for thesehelpers of theism... Conclusion? If Marthe, Trophime,Sidoine, Maximin, etc..., had converted Tarrascon, Arles, Aix,... there would be one Gospeland one only, the "first" Matthew". But they were simple spectators,as usual stritcly understanding nothing. And historical Yaccoub, (historical brother of historical Jeshouah), that first thought his  brother "nut",understood that preaching a "second return of the Lord"could start a new revolt in Galilea. What happened when he was killed. By that time, Lazare, Peter, the lot of Maries, Marthe, Trophime, Sidoine, Maximin, had died...

   

 6.5 Religion? do leave this a problem to a  "professional":

        The central problem of Religion therefore comes from the theosophists, historians, or philosophers "structured mentally" : all support theism and atheism ending in  null matches not urging  us to change camp!   I hope I've shown that this problem is not for amateurs, sorboniqueurs included. The latter confirm their mental blocking by their use of true philosophers: Kant, Count, (whio contributed so much to the progress of thought and logic), are preached like the texts of Hosea or Jeremiah.
        The false religion, its swindle and jokes, must be fought in a professional way. Only the "professional  preacher " has the feeling to recognise the value of an opponent,  able, as recommanded by Celsus: "to describe and make them flee!". My preferred reference?  to have 'burst" Paul@K Pal  and his "red mullets". With three more effects, (normal if, " in a great discovery, (gravity), the method, (calculus) is much more useful than the discovery":
the formula used is valid to eject from TVs the "athéo-chrestiniques", (and any intello-racist):

"You knew? saloparDios! you  were unaware ? conarDios! Now you know!"

it probable that the formula was used to bring my Pote Pole Pope Paul@Cujus to CanosShalom,

 (I'm deeply sorry for delaying  my "revelation" so much,  not to help sovietism);

the formula is perfectly usable against any reprenor of the monitheism,

 ("l'Affaire de la Faisanderie"  becomes a certificate of super-excellence);

probably we won't live the fourth auto-fucking,

(for "neo-satammism", this counterpart to  "paleo-satammism"), because already carried out.

        Had I time, I would attack the immense KSDJ Himalaya, "redactionned"  these last sixty years, by the "Bull-Dozer method":   all spare parts  examined and noted according to importance and veracity,  (using the logic post-computer, and the nicebutterfly of Poincaré).
        I do not think that the final result would be very different. .

6.6 Homage to Poidebard, (1878-1955)

        A professor must accept "orphan courses". Me?  I asked for the Antiquity, (few amateurs for it!). It is easy, even resting. But I deviated with time: instead of following the axis Cairo-Athens-Rome, well overrated, I discovered that our "civisation" was pure heritage babylonien. It was enough to discover and dig the "satammism", not a religion at all, (just monitheism with a religious mask). Perhaps I owe this evolution to  Poidebard, met at the University of Beirut, when detached from the French Navy, (1947-48). 2005 is the fiftieth anniversary of his disappearance. I doubt that France gives him  the homage he deserves.
        As many scientists do, Poidebard improved his discovery, without seeing the possibility of an enormous opening, to break the "puzzle of the joKriss". The university pushes towards "sterile disputatio " and "presentable  justificatio ". No more progress. But I recognize that the statute protects you: Newton, Darwin, Einstein, Wittgentein prove it. Comte, Schopenhauer, Ferrari paid for their contempt for the "Varsity". But I would have missed " l'Affaire de la Faisanderie ", (I lived more respected in the Land of Pentagons!).

I would have died with the impression of a debt  (of a cowardice), towards, futuregenerations.

G Lelarge,  "Philo-Manager", Engineer data processing, (National Computing Center, 1970-1973), expert  in the International Labour Office, (1971 till retirement) following a data-processing contribution, (1965), considered to be exceptional by specialists in Management. Intervention as a consultant in 175 companies, (50 to 80.000 employees), Philips, , SONATRACH, Ministries of Algeria, Venezuela, Mines of Zaire, etc...

Anti-Atheologo-Chrestinisme

Pâques 2005 concentre:
15è anniversaire de ma proposition à curaille-France d'utiliser le télé-temps alloués aux "rougets" et "violets" pour régler la Xristouille.
10è anniversaire de l'élection de Chirak, (suite à mon blackboulage de Baladin...),
Le centenaire de la conception de mon journal,DEMAIN , (pas si disparut^[5]), à l'origine de mon "incroyable traversée du 20è siècle"; c'est surtout
40è anniversaire de la séquestration-destruction de ma fille par la curaille espagnazie. La bête en est crevée!.

L'aJUSTICE, tarot

1/ Le monde vu de la Tour Parnasse   1.1Deuxième comparaison de références   1.2 Rencontre ave les 4 nouveaux évangélistes   1.3 Troisième comparaisonde références 2/ Vivisectiond'un pétosophequi s'ignore   2.1. Examen rapide de l'Athéologie argentanaïaise 3/Un livre dangereux,car  pas toujours faux   3.1 Commentdevient-on prof de philopour adultes   3.2 Préparation religieusedu Rd Loyson   3.3Quelle Nicky l'Obstaclea donné l'imprim@Tours?   3.4Vingt ans en "technique"sans rencontrer Sain d'Esprit   3.5 CommentArgentan sélectionneses Lumignons    (Marx, Nietzsche,Freudy, Feuerbach,Vaneigem, Spinoza) 4/ Réponse à ratafia-compile, kif Gars-Raudy   4.1 Zorro Babel,fuyant Xerxés, deux fois   4.2 Existence d'unJeshouah historique   4.3 La doctrine de Saulparfaite parce que vide      4.4Un fait minime, appelé à un grand futur   4.5 Constantin,13è apôtre ou premier pape?   4.6 Le crime le plus gravede l'histoire 4.7 Comicosophe Loyson morigèneinKANTournable   4.8 L'anti-athéisme,bien différent de nos jours 5/ La révolution informatique   5.1 Commentprogresse la connaissance   5.2 Déterminer qui a le droitde l'ouvrir  5.3 Nous vivons une"nouvelle axiale"   5.4 Théorie de créativitéet doctrine de civilisation 6/ Students all over the World, fuck your fuckers   6.1 Eduquerles professeurs!   6.2 Philosophiecommevie réussie   6.3 AnUnending Quest   6.4 A la chasseau papillon   6.5L'aReligion, problèmede "professionalisme"   6.6Hommage à Poidebard  ..

1ère,  (par mon 'dressage'), 2ème, (par le Pape),  3ème, (par la Joconde)  4ème, (par le centenaire de mon journal),  5ème, (par les trois derniers TORQUEMADA),  6ème, (mano à mano)

7ème,(par usine en CENTRE-AFRIQUE) 8ème,(par dernière axiale)   9ème, (par mes "prévisions"),  10ème, (par B.I.T. and DATAMATION), 11ème,(par Grands Moteurs); 12ème,(par logique post-informatique)

Pourquoi les noodigmes, "ponts-aux-ânes", ne sont pas des check-points qui contrôlent, des filtres filtrant. Tout est faussé par les "peaux-d'ânes" remises memoris causa. Et le grand universitaire, connaît Darwin, l'enseigne mais ne le vit pas; et se fait moucher par la torchonnée, (vraiment ma "règle du T"  est universelle).        Et l'Université devient cheval de Troie.

Ferry

1.3 Troisième comparaison de références,         Au Louvre, je rencontrai un groupe d'Anglais qui cherchaient la Joconde : «Come along!" - "Are you a guide?" - "No, just a Mona-Lover Guy". Devant la Princesse, ils aimèrent madéfinition d'un grand portrait: "A presence, like Laurence Oliver on the stage", ma théorie du point zéro appliqué au sourire J'expliquais à mes Anglais le vrai mystère, pas le sourire, mais les millions de visiteurs qui venaient pour la photo avec elle. Comme chaque visiteur voyait sa Joconde différemment, elle devait changer selon mon humeur ou la lumière du jour, (un grand moment fut le matin où je restai seul avec elle!) J'expliquais que Vinci, panthéiste, avait représenté le mythe de la Grande Déesse, (vénérée dans le monde entier), ce qui explique ce curieux paysage du premier jour de la création. A mon avis la femme du banquier,  se trouve à Madrid.                Une petite découverte peut cacher une grande explication et Vinci est une source continuelle de  découverte : à Madrid existe une copie de la Joconde, bien différente de la princesse du Louvre : une personne vêtue de rose et vert, de l'âge de la femme du banquier Giocondo en 1503. Le fonds du tableau est en noir, comme courant à cette époque. Pourtant ce paysage bizarre est facile à copier, (voir la copie de la duchesse of Cadix, de Goya, par Goya lui-même). En logique post-ordinatique, appliquons « falsify pour fortify ». (1), Ce ne serait pas la première fois que Vinci mène deux tableaux du même sujet. (2), Ce tableau aurait été peint ou rapporté par Yanez, qui avait travaillé à Florence avec Vinci mais à égalité puisque de payé à part. Ensuite il travailla à  la cathédrale de Valencia, dans le style florentin, "con olio fino".  Monna, (en italien madame), devient en Espagne Mona, (qui signifie jolie). Si no è vero...            Mes Anglais furent si enthousiastes que je leur offris mon Louvre: la Belle Nani, le top niveau de la peinture, (elle résida longtemps à côté de la Joconde), la Ferronnière que j'appelle "Next Station, Joconde", car elle utilise déjà la palette pauvre qui servit à Mona Lisa. Rôle de Richelieu le Tordu, (les peintres devait transformer un village brûlé en un exploit royal): parfait exemple, le "chef-d'œuvre" de Fragonard à coté de quatre portraits dignes de Renoirs. Second employeur, le moine qui imposa la peinture alimentaire le «maniérisme»: le capucin ajoutait du sang de bœuf et deux doses prussique.. Les yeux fixent le ciel, les mains jointes s'ankylosent.         Avec cette peinture de moine, St Régis, (passé de braire), résout le problème des petits délinquants. Nos "chefs coutumiers" applaudissent. Le Che fait trois tours dans sa tombe. Moi, je suis très limité, du mains, je vous ai éviter un "best-seller" genre "Soyez créatif comme Vinci". Ai-je ouvert la porte au "Da Vin-Shit Code"?, comme le baron ouvrit la porte à un "auriol" en blackboulant Edouard Ier Herriot, comme moi, en "pétant" Edouard II Balandouille... c'est pas facile d'aider les "bestiaux plat-coniques"

Mon tout?  "néo-super-trahison des clercs";[18] Pour protéger lesgénérations futures, je renie un serment, (ne jamais financer un charlatan), j'achète l'a-théolologie du Rd Loyson, pour vivisection,

2.1 Examen rapide de l'Athéologie

2.1.1 Analyse de surface, face: le "combat avec l'ange",         "Jacob est arrêté par un inconnu avec lequel il va se battre toute la nuit.. l'inconnu le blesse à la hanche et transforme son nom en Israël.", (moi ?)(cinquième comparaison de références), j'ai dix ans de lutte avec les trois derniers Torquemadas et comme symbole philosophique, . Moi, je préfère "un poisson-chat dans la rivière...":  "Inside, you live but don't see; outside, you see, but don't live..." Dedans, tu vis, tu ne vois pas; dehors, tu vois, tu ne vis pas..." Dentro, vives pero no ves: fuera, ves pero no vives dos, ça se gâte!         Dès la première ligne! "Les trois monothéismes" ? A ce que je sache, le jusd'aïsme est un "hénauthéisme", (camouflant un "monithéisme"). Les deux autres religions? la volonté de conquérir le monde, (par tous les moyens, de la ruse au massacre), rendrait monothéiste ? (Mohammed kif Attila et les Gengis-Khan et Mao-Staline? des Croisés?)

descendre à son niveau et le rouler dans sa farine ou
lui donner la clef, la recette satammiquepour qu'il enterre lui-même sa prose et ses propositions.

3.1 Premier mystère d'Argentan: comment devient-on prof de philo pour adultes

.

Moi, je préfère "un poisson-chat dans la rivière...":  "Inside, you live but don't see; outside, you see, but don't live..." Dedans, tu vis, tu ne vois pas; dehors, tu vois, tu ne vis pas..." Dentro, vives pero no ves: fuera, ves pero no vives

Aristoto

"prout-bidets"

3.2 Deuxième mystère d'Argentan: préparation religieuse du Rd Loyson

Blocage mental inquiétant lorsqu'il soutient que l'Eglise introduisit la transubstantation grâce à l'aristotologie![36] Il ne cherche pas même à savoir par qui, (pourquoi et pour quoi) Platcon fut consacré "divin", ni les raisons du perfectionisme de l'aLogique, durant les Dark Ages, (qu'Aristote avait déjà condamné!)

3.3 Troisième mystère d'Argentan: quelle Nicky l'Obstacle a donné l'imprim@Tours?

3.4 Quatrième mystère d'Argentan: 20 ans en "technique" sans voir Sain d'Esprit,

3.5 Cinquième mystère d'Argentan: comment Argentan sélectionne ses Lumières"

            Saul pose un paradoxe: en comparant Actes 16, 16-22 et 18, 12-17, l'Empire romain apparaît comme le plus tolérant  et le plus laïc des Etats ayant existé. Comment est-il devenu  le plus systématique persécuteur jamais connu? un petit papillon suggère uneanalogie? Devons-nous parler d'une guerre de religion de trois cents ans? se retrournant contre les inspirateurs, terminant en St-Barthélémy numéro un?
            Qui a écrit les Evangiles? Marc, Luc!? Probablement des collecteurs de fonds du Saul qui venaient aux nouvelles et ont fait leur marché selon besoins...  Temps de montrer que nous sommes dans la logique imposée par l'apparition de l'Ordinateur, que nous avons craché l'aristotologique et le cartésiânisme.
            Que "l'avorton", (qui introduisit juste la 'divine' théorie des "bestiaux platoniques"),  ait tout ignoré du Jessouah historique, devint "pain béni",  Ses "disciples" purent faire leur marché à JésuShalom comme un poissonnier à Rungis. Ils virent des "appâts" pour  fretin prêt à gober un leurre peu différent, (exactement ce que feront  les "prouts-bidets" avec les philosophes). Les disciples de Mithra aime le baptême au sang de boeuf? J'emprunte la cruciFiction. L'Egypte a vendu à Rome son Osiris découpé, revenu de l'enfer? Idem le joKriss!  Néron se construit la "Domus Aurea"? Qui ne voitl'analogie  avec la pastille fourrée au joKriss dans un petit soleil? promenée dans les rues et campagnes. )^[45] .
        Toutes croyances et coutumes méditerranéennes y seront fourrées. Pour égaler les empereurs qui deviennent dieux à leur mort, joKriss devient dieu, (fils seulement, faut pas fermer la porte aux "vrais juifs"!) Pourquoi un troisième? parce que YHWHL à l'origine est marié, avec la Shekinah, qui se camoufle en Sagesse, Sophie, Logos; et voilà trois Dieux Infinis,  compressibles.
            Par la suite, on en ajoutera un quatrième, la Divine Baisée, la masque de la Grande Déesse vénérée du Japon à la Terre de Feu. Peu à peu, elle a un piqué la place à Saint-Esprit, trop asexué pour être adoré.^[46]   Peu à peu, la Grande Baisée pique la place au Saint-Pigeon, trop asexué pour être adoré. ^[46]  Marie-Madeleine, l'épouse historique bien gênante? transformée en pute soumise.  Dans les évangiles, on compte SOIXANTE-SIX bouffes. Bien sûr, les paroissiens attendaient le retour du Seigneur. Alors le nouveau converti apportait son fric et les "parousiaques" le bouffaient en chantant.
        Sans Marc et Luc, le "chrestinisme" aurait disparu et Jérusalem serait un Carthage, Sagonte, Palmyre. Retouche de peinture? L'un devient "disciple de Saul; l'autre celui de Petrus, (sans jamais le rencontrer! ) Mais le Matthieu, probablement disciple historique du Jeshouah?

Car il y eut un  "premier Matthieu", obsédé à démontrer: "Jeshouah a fait ce qui fut prévu... Ce qu'il a fait fut prévu!". Facile ensuite de Fabrication de "doublets" pour faire disparaître les acteurs historiques: Joseph, grand bourgeois, devient charpentier. Et  Jeshouah devint joKriss.

        Mais le Johannes?  trouvé dans une cruche, dans une grotte, dans une île, (c'est probablement récit de judéen ayant connu le Jeshouah). "Viene de perlas"! Taillable et farcissable à volonté. Car dans les "synoptiques", seul Pilate parle de "judei"! La piste qui explique qu'on ne put ramener  les quatre évangiles à un seul texte.
          Mais pensons post-ordinatique! Théorie de recherche, "to falsify". Les "judei", durant la Moyen-Age réclamèrent, financèrent les Croisades qui leur rendraient leur "patrie". Ils se précipitèrent pour s'y installer. Loupé, ce "falsify to fortify". Cherchons ailleurs, en balayant large et loin dans le passé.

Note: très belle démonstration du vide intellectuel qui triomphe en théologie à travers les millénaires:  http://www.bjnewlife.org/french/bstudy/sermons_52.php

Avec aujourd'hui, une justification-cureton ahurissante: "les survivants étaient devenus incapables de raconter! Personne ne pouvait les comprendre" Pourtant Annette Franck, (victime de la connerie paternelle et transformée en or-cendres), fut un best-seller.

5.1 Comment progresse la connaissance
        "Résoudre un problème nous prépare à en résoudre un plus grand..." Merci Popper, mais je préfère: "permet de voir un problème pas encore vu". Lorsque je résous "l'administration intégrée", je me rend compte que le terme de "gestion" était déjà une erreur bloquante. Et surtout j'étais persuadé que ma proposition est si évidente, logique qu'un Wallace l'avait trouvée. Je chercherai 13 ans, (persuadé que seul un Anglais pouvait trouver, je me retrouverai avec un très bon diplôme anglais). Vous comprenez que j'ai passé ma vie à examiner comment chacun pense, avocat, ingénieur, médecin, prof... Tous dans le même sac, paralysé par l'Aristotologique rectifiée Cartésiânisme, (le "système D" des ateliers). ^[58] Avec nuance française, une prétention sans bornes.

5.2 Déterminer qui a le droit de l'ouvrir

"vocation"

Mes droits de l'ouvrir furent alors décuplés. Alors que les monothéistes me célébraient comme le MoMoï vengeur du Vrai Zeusio, une mafia hénauthéiste, monithéiste, jeta une OPA sur le "paléo-satammisme". Le virage fut annoncé par Pote Lulu, par télé-menace de tribunal, (26 septembre 1993). Appel au ban et arrière ban des chiots pisseux, goys confondus; un véritable harassement socio-religieux, (un aveu qu'ils n'y aurait pas de 4ème auto-couillade: elle était déjà auto-réalisée).

"Déché(Fr)ance

Aujourd'hui,  les "goys" paient pour ne s'être pas sentis concernés par cette Saint-Barthélémy industrielle. Car Hitler n'avait pu tuer "même les enfants". Alors les survivants se sont vengés. Dans l'aReligion, "crime sur crime vaut". Tout fut inversé par la "révélation" du prophète de Wilnius. Il fit taire les YidWest, (en leur créant des dossiers?), et culpabilisa les "euroGoys".

        Travail parfait pour Pote Lulu, mon copain d'études, s'il veut aider les générationsssuivantes, (aux dernières nouvelles, il s'est trouvé un curieux refuge, en cette année Jules Vernes, "cent semaines en ballon!")
           Il sait que personne ne va créer l'argumentaire pour justifier le "néo-satammisme" triomphant. Malgré les "témoignages de souffrances" et les  "philosophes" offrant  leurrédactionnisme certifié sorbonique, et le soutien de autorités et autres gastéropodes, (voir le dernier pour Derry Dada!)

5.3 Nous vivons une nouvelle "axiale": quelle ne soit pas manquée comme en 1945, au moment de "l'ouverture des camps"!  Il faut seulement admettre que l'impossible est possible, puisqu'il suffit, parmi les milliards d'enfants livrés à la misère, d'un seul qui voit ce que tous peuvent voir. Evidemment, trouver un gosse totalement neutre, (ni thée ni athée), le fourguer dans le catho-satammisme sans qu'il parte au bout d'un quart d'heure, (ce qui fut ma tentation!), mais conclue: "Si le joKriss n'est pas le fils de Dieu, je dois au moins comprendre cette farce!". Et sans qu'il ne soit pas repéré, éjecté... (on imagine les conflits de vues entre mes parrains!)           Dommage que les pivot-sophes et pétosophes, porte-paroles du monithéisme, n'aient pas compris comment on attire dans la nasse du Petrus, que bien peu auront le courage de "défroquer", et même dans ce cas, resteront éternellement "ficelés dans les mailles", (beaucoup conservent leur ciboire et le caresse en absence de leur femme). Freud n'a pas vu que pour devenir un homme un prêtre doit tuer sa mère!          Ceci vous explique que je vois différemment le culte de la person"alitée vaticanante. Je me demande si le "bunker" n'a pas retardé son départ d'un jour. Comme tous les "croyants", j'aurais aimé le jour de Pâques, 15ème anniversaire de mon texte deconstructeur du joKriss. J'ai toujours vu mes "potes" à leur niveau, Lulu léger et qui n'est resté que "parce qu'un Xf ne rend jamais ce qu'il a pris..." (comme expliqué, (durant le Grand Négationisme, il y a 50 ans), par un "roumain", persuadé que le "YidEastern" était archi-disparu, que tous passeraient au "YidWestern"); Pote Paul, comme un lourdaud se bourrant de charabia qui a mérité un Prix Wittgenstein. Ses doctorats ne semblent pas mériter un tel honneur.        Ceci vous explique que je vois le ramdam de Pote Paul comme une variante, genre 5ème évangile de Saint Gibson, ou le joKriss en dix émissions du Prieur Mordillat, (lequel est le plus oublié aujourd'hui?) Que les souffrances du 263è joKriss, (moins les prédécesseurs de Constantinus Imperator!) me rappellent les millions d'enfants qui ont vu leurs parents agoniser horriblement, (sans médicaments, parce que le marketing médical pensait les ponctionner), je pense aux enfants Rwandais qui ont vu leurs parents s'entredécouper à la machete, je pense aux enfants russes poussés dans le schniff et la misère, pour envoyer quelques nouveaux grands-ducs, (sans-religion!) vers la Côte d'Azur. Je me rappelle la tête du Paul@K le dimanche soir de son départ de Bucarest après avoir réclamé "ses biens nécessaires à sa mission". Alors je regrette ma patience: je devais sortir "geCou dans les Nouilles", dès l'apparition de Gorby. Il aurait été plus difficile à "limoger"..

           Zeusio, fatigué des papi-comédianti" s'offrit un comédien-pape. Quelle démonstration du parler-cureton, de la confession en coulée continue: "Ayant perdu toute sa famille à vingt-et-un an, il rentra au séminaire". Son coursus n'est pas clair, sauf pour le meilleur spécialiste reconnu par Pote Paul@K, (moi, "modestus" puisque "guy"). Je diagnostique, "vocation tardive", "V.T.", en français, "vieux tacot". L'Eglise s'en méfie plus que d'un bâtard choléra-peste. Une mine d'aventures explosives. Comment Pote Paul a franchi les "check points"? parce que guerre froide? good mais insuffisant dans le cadre moni-théiste

        Un auteur anglais a proposé unedéfinition originale de la "vocation": "décongeler le cerveau, buriner, re-congeler..."  "Outside-view" sans intérêt, parfaitement utilisable pour le transfert des pouvoirs entre "paléo" et néo" (satammismes). Il faut savoir que tout est combine dans ces institutions, marchandages et chantages. Petit rappel centenaire: le pape qui n'osa déconstruire DEMAIN et son équipe, (à la Jarnac!), s'appelait Pio el Decimator, une réplique venicienne du minable J.P. 1er, (l'escabeau qui rehaussa  le Paul@K).  Opposition totale au favori, de l'empereur d'Autriche, par archevêque de Cracovie interposé, (un autrichien bien sûr). Le spectre et le sceptre de Constantinus Imperator, premier pape, furent actif jusqu'en 1918.

            L'élection du Paul@K commence par le cul-cul-poussette d'un Fouchtr'Asien vers Notre-Dame. Le risque d'un pape français était trop grand après le minable série Pomodori. Alors, dans le dos: le pape vint du froid. L'exaltation de la person'alitée masque totalement l'histoire d'une "Judith cachée en Israël, qui lui rendait visite", (kif la MoniKaka du ClintoNéant, plus effective). Affaire connue? en réserve avant l'élection? (le putsch fut mené par les Allemands et les Américains? significatif!) A canoShalom, Paul@Cujus a finalement remis les clefs du Petrus, (évêque indocile calmé au "prêtéraste" mais tout se réglera au sommet, par lèse-majesté).
             Oubliée la reconnaissance internationale accordée à Kurt Waldheim, le propulsant au niveau de CharleMagne, de Nabot-Lycaonn, de Francoco... Oublié le titre de "Protector de la Fe" accordée à Pine Hochet. La Vox Populas exige la canonisation immédiate, (à propos, trouvez-moi un "sacerdos" ayant prié St Pio Nove ou St Ronculo depuis six ans...) On retrouve les trois phases de mon ami anglais, terminant par  re-congélation super-médiatique.

5.4 Diffuser une théorie de vraie créativité et une doctrine de civilisation.

l'aristotologie

l'aristotologie

Simpleanalogie, la CHOSA réclame un prophète, prêchant la "solution finale" à qui pouvait l'interdire: Roosevelt, un WASP, qui tolérait les papistes et les "JdPs" mais contrôlant leurs chamen, Pio Duce, obsédé par le judéo-marxiste, déboulant place St-Pierre, couteau entre les dents...

Je ne vois pas pourquoi les maudits de 68, picards ou bretons ayant osé demandé des sous à McHarlot, stoppés-couillonnés par le joKriss de mai, remplacés par 20/30 millions de français d'origine africaine, ne demanderaient pas des comptes. Je ne vois pas pourquoi les jeunes Européens ne verraient pas le montage utilisant pour les enfoncer dans la misère les 500.000 enfants gazés-brûlés; et renverseraient cette inverse.

Si l'utilisation du 11 septembre 2001 était la plus que probable, la tentante, la facile, "Lucky Luke contre Watson", "Bien contre Mal", d'autres structures historiques étaient utilisables, comme :    la séparation YidEast et YidWest, ou même    Goys versus KSDJs.           Il suffisait d'un coup de pouce, comme fit Bush, en besoin du diable si efficace dans l'histoire. Et le bon diable, nativement intelligent, fut immédiatement reconnaissant envers le simplet en besoin de simplisme.  Kerry élu arrêtait l'aventure irakienne mais demandait à son armée, avant retour dans ses foyers, de ratisser les refuges de Ben Laden .

6.1 Eduquer les professeurs!

6.2 Philosophie comme vie réussie, vie comme philosophie réussie

        "L'Affaire de la Faisanderie" n'a rien facilité, (je n'ai pu réécrire mon cours de créativité); mais "ce ne fut pas trop cher payé", (sicut dixit All Bright MadelHaine, 3ème Nobel de l'Assassaint).

6.3 An "Unending Quest".

        Je considère qu'un vrai philosophe est aussi difficile à comprendre qu'un savant. Je tâche de le réduire à une formule et d'en déduire des conséquences, "falsify to fortify". Ce qui fait du livre, (par nature imposant un point final), un genre faux dans le cadre de la logique post-ordinatique, bloquant tout développement, (résoudre un problème prépare à voir un autre problème, pas encore vu...)
       Nous avons déduit que le "premier" Matthieu fut dédié exclusivement à démontrer que Jeshouah était bien le "messie", uniquement destiné à calmer les Galiléens: "Le Messie est  venu, il a tout fait. N'attendez plus personne!"..
Déductions:
Toute tentative d'exportation  hors de Palestine furent bloquées? Sûr, et "manu militari", par "bras séculier".
Aucun "apôtre" ne partit prêcher? Pas de Petrus à Rome, pas de Santiago à Compostela!
         Difficile à avaler? "Si e vero...", en imitant  les paléo-zoo-logistes du pré-cambrien, nous devrions retrouver des traces du vrai Matthieu, actif et diffusé durant trente ans.

6.4   A la chasse au papillon:

       La cruciFiction est bourrée d'allusions connues, le partage des vêtements, "ils ont compté tous mes os". Avec cadavre qui saigne et vinaigre qui tue ...
        "Jésus, sachant que tout était fini, dit,  (pour accomplir les écritures); "J'ai soif". Ils lui donnèrent du vinaigre, (allusion au Psaume 69 21b: "Pour ma soif, ils m'ont donné du vinaigre..."
        Insuffisant pour évacuer les Maries de la Sainte-Baume, Lazare de Marseilles, (venus avec la tête du Yaccoub et celles de trois innocents!). On continue?
        Que vient faire une "fuite en Egypte" dans le "canonique" Matthieu .
             Matt, 2,13-15: "...an angel said to Joseph... take the child to Egypt. Stay until I tell you... And so was fulfilled what the Lord had said through the prophet: "Out of Egypt, I called my son."
               Matt, 2,13-15: "After Herod was dead, an angel of the Lord... said to Joseph: "Get up, take the child and his mother to the land of Israel..."
            Nous l'avons vu, le voyage égyptien fut utile à Marc à Rome, pour attirer les soudards roamins retour d'Egypte. Mais cela n'explique pas son introduction dans son évangile. Sauf si le premier Matthieu a trouvé  une "prophétie"  devant être accomplie. Correct ! Dans Hosée, il y a un retour d'Egypte avec une nouvelle vie pour le peuple de YWHL:

            Hosée, (11,¹): "When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called my son."

          Parfois, l'accomplissement se limite à la similitude mais, en religion, tous les argumentaires sont bons à prendre, (quantité devient qualité!)  et nous trouvons une analogie avec les sciences: tout le progrès vient d'une lueur observée par Branly, d'une poussière vue par Fleming, (I, pour un, a choisi la puce et le bicameralism au sujet de l'année 50). Tous les testaments devraient devenir un endroit de chasse pour despapillons de Poincaré, disparaissant  continuellement. Ceci " ne pense pas dans les images " depuis de grands garanties de Poincaré de mathématicien lui-même.

Exemple: la comparaison entre Jean-Baptiste au Jordain: Mark, 1, 6: "John wore clothing made of camel's hair, with a leather belt round his waist" et la description  du prophète Elie au roi de Samarie:           2 Kings 1, 8: "They replied, "He was a man with a garment of hair and with a leather belt round his waist . (The Bible, Hodder and Stoughton, 1979)             Il est facilede reconstituer le Baptiste historiqueà partir du traitement qui lui fut . Pour comprendre, nous devrions nous rappeler que le peuple a cru qu'Elie précéderait et annonceraitle Messiah. Le premier Matthew comparant le baptiste à Elijaha montré que Jeshouah était le Messiah. Cetteanalogie est facilement trouvée dans le Gospel mais les Evangelists ", ne voyant pas l'intérêt pour leurs paroissiens, ont pris etlaissé ces "détails", se contredisant l'un l'autre. Matthieu, (ré-écrit sepuis Marc),considère Baptiste comme Elie lui-même, (17.13). Luc conserve une petite partie: "Baptiste marchera avec l'esprit et la puissance d'Elie ". Mais, dans le 4ème Evangile, (1, 19-22),le Baptiste lui-même déclare qu'il n'est ni le Messie  niElie...                Et ainsi de suite, myriades de papillons: "... Il faut temps et patience. Les penseurs et les "sauveurs" sponténés sont la pestedes entreprises et et de l'humanité. Nous devrions créer un Grand Ordre de la Béquille pour cesauxilliaires du théisme... Conclusion? Si Marthe, Trophime,Sidoine, Maximin, etc....., avaient converti Tarrascon, Arles, Aix... il y aurait un Evangileet un seul,  le "premier Matthieu". Mais ils étaient de simples  spectateurs,comme d'habitude ne comprenant rien. Et le Yaccoub historique, (frère historique du Jeshouah historique), qui  pensa d'abord son frère dingue,comprit que la prédication  d'un de retour du Seigneur"pourrait provoquer une nouvelle révolte en Galilée. Ce qui se produit dès son assassinat. À ce moment, Lazare, Peter, la bande des Maries, Marthe, Trophime, Sidoine, Maximin, tous étaient mort...

6.5 L'aReligion, problème de "professionalisme":

          Le problème central de l'aReligion vient donc des théosophes, historiens, ou philosophes "structurés mentalement" pour ne pas comprendre. Tous soutiennent le théisme ou l'athéisme lors de matchs nuls qui n'engagent personne à changer de camp! J'espère avoir montré que ce problème n'est pas du niveau amateurs, sorboniqueurs inclus. Ces derniers confirment par leur utilisation des vrais philosophes: Kant, Comte, (qui ont tant contribué au progrès de la pensée et de la logique), sont récupérés, prêchés  comme les textes d'Hosée ou Jérémie.

        L'aReligion, escroquerie et farce, doit être combattue de manière professionnelle. Seul le "prêcheur" peut reconnaître la valeur d'un opposant capable,  comme recommandeé par Celsus de "les décrire pour les faire fuir!", (dans leurs égoûts préférrés). La référence que je préfère, c'est d'avoir "pété" Pote Paul@K et ses "rougets". De ce Pierre, trois coups, selon règle que dans une grande découverte, (gravité), la méthode, (calculus) est bien plus utile que la découverte:
la formule utilisée est valable pour éjecter des télés les athéo-chrestiniques, (et tout intello-raciste):

"Tu savais? saloparDios! Tu ignorais? conarDios! Maintenant tu sais!"

il est probable que la formule fut utilisée pour mettre à genoux Pote Pole Pope Paul@Cujus, (alors que j'avais  (trop), retardé pour ne pas aider le soviétisme);
la formule est parfaitement utilisable contre tout repreneur du monithéisme, (" l'Affaire de la Faisanderie" se transforme en certificat de compétence);
la quatrième auto-couillade, (réplique néo-satammiste de l'implosion paléo-satammiste), n'aura probablement pas lieu, parce que déjà réalisée.

          Si j'en avais le temps,  j'attaquerais l'immense Himalaya KSDJ,rédactionné ces 60 dernières années, par "méthode Bull-Dozer": repartir à zéro, tout à plat, tout examiné et noté selon importance et véracité, (en utilisant l'ordinateur et sa post-logique, et le gentil papillon de Poincaré).
        Je ne pense pas que le résultat serait très différent.

Il suffisait de découvrir et de creuser le "satammisme", qui n'a rien d'une religion, (au plus un "monithéisme), mais nécessite une "sacrée justification", (ou une "justification sacrée "?) Je dois peut-être cette évolution à Poidebard, rencontré à l'Université de Beyrouth, comme détaché de la Royale, (1947-48).  2005 est le cinquantenaire anniversaire de sa disparition.